Naked Sunbathing ....
Discussion
gothic said:
I am Morien Jones - the neighbour who provided some of the police evidence that took Lynette Burgess to court.
You ask questions, I will attempt to answer them.
1) The filmed naked incident happened on my property, in front of my house and down the path to the main road and absolutely NOT in Lynette Burgess' garden as she claims, but the film proves this. This has been widely miss-reported by the National Papers, initially including the BBC Web-site.
2) I DID NOT SAY “ She walked back and fore completely naked - I went to get my video camera to record the incident.” as the BBC reports. The video was taken by the builder and not Mr. Jones (myself) and this is provable, as I can be seen in some shots . Originally we were filming the renovation of the house and she walked passed. We videoed from inside the living room, to protect ourselves against false accusations which she is prone to making. We were very wary of this neighbour who had accused us of "Controlling her water", and had employed a builder to knock down our coal shed in the first few days of us moving there.
On opening the door of our new property on day one we found the two dead mice and a dead robin had been pushed through the letterbox. This made the situation tense before Lynette's naked wanderings. We had been advised by the police to keep a record and gather evidence.
3) The naked walk was not an individual incident and adds to a long list of events that are being put together if ever a case for harassment is undertaken.
4) The Crown Prosecution Unit originally took on this case as :- Harassment / Indecent Exposure and later dropped the Harassment charge because Harassment is notoriously difficult to prove. Therefore we were left with just the video incident to talk about, and no other events after. There is a long list of more sinister events to consider.
5) I have no objection to her nude sunbathing on her own property; I draw the line at wandering my property naked where my kids play.
6) She has now been arrested and causioned for criminal damage.
Some facts of this case have been blurred. In my opinion this blurring in the National Press has allowed Lynette Burgess to continue her campaign of harassment on a national scale.
I have recieved apologies from :_ the BBC, The Times, The Telegraph, The Daily Mail, The News & Star, The Yorkshire Post, The Independant.
It has, continues to be a struggle, but it seems 1 News Agency miss-reporting a story can bring on a world of grief.
PS. I would be of the same opinion as you on reading the national papers.
Kind regards,
Morien Jones
Wales
You ask questions, I will attempt to answer them.
1) The filmed naked incident happened on my property, in front of my house and down the path to the main road and absolutely NOT in Lynette Burgess' garden as she claims, but the film proves this. This has been widely miss-reported by the National Papers, initially including the BBC Web-site.
2) I DID NOT SAY “ She walked back and fore completely naked - I went to get my video camera to record the incident.” as the BBC reports. The video was taken by the builder and not Mr. Jones (myself) and this is provable, as I can be seen in some shots . Originally we were filming the renovation of the house and she walked passed. We videoed from inside the living room, to protect ourselves against false accusations which she is prone to making. We were very wary of this neighbour who had accused us of "Controlling her water", and had employed a builder to knock down our coal shed in the first few days of us moving there.
On opening the door of our new property on day one we found the two dead mice and a dead robin had been pushed through the letterbox. This made the situation tense before Lynette's naked wanderings. We had been advised by the police to keep a record and gather evidence.
3) The naked walk was not an individual incident and adds to a long list of events that are being put together if ever a case for harassment is undertaken.
4) The Crown Prosecution Unit originally took on this case as :- Harassment / Indecent Exposure and later dropped the Harassment charge because Harassment is notoriously difficult to prove. Therefore we were left with just the video incident to talk about, and no other events after. There is a long list of more sinister events to consider.
5) I have no objection to her nude sunbathing on her own property; I draw the line at wandering my property naked where my kids play.
6) She has now been arrested and causioned for criminal damage.
Some facts of this case have been blurred. In my opinion this blurring in the National Press has allowed Lynette Burgess to continue her campaign of harassment on a national scale.
I have recieved apologies from :_ the BBC, The Times, The Telegraph, The Daily Mail, The News & Star, The Yorkshire Post, The Independant.
It has, continues to be a struggle, but it seems 1 News Agency miss-reporting a story can bring on a world of grief.
PS. I would be of the same opinion as you on reading the national papers.
Kind regards,
Morien Jones
Wales
Some people have got nothing better to do, come on taff, you've got some cracking roads around by you, get out there and give your car a good thrashing. Get rid of some of that nervous energy.
Oakey said:
Has the original post been edited? Because you all went on one about him filming the neighbour but the BBC article mentions she walked in front of the neighbours house and down the drive. At first I thought you were being a little harsh on the guy.
The BBC article has been changed since the original poster copied it, no doubt as a result of Morien pointing out to the BBC that the original article was extremely misleading. Absolute nightmare having lunatic neighbours. Hope you find an adequate solution.
It looks like the original agency report was *extremely* misleading, I myself thought it was very odd behaviour to video somebody and then complain about it, but your comments shed a different light on the story. Luckily you seem to have had your reply and/or an apology printed in just about every place where the original article has been discussed.
Einion Yrth said:
Parrot of Doom said:
Upload the video to the internet. Bollocks to her.
She's 55 POD, do you really want to see that?
I don't know anything about the lady in question but don't let's get overly focussed on this age thing. There are some real tubs of lard around at half her age.
Best wishes all,
Dave.
this is all a bit weird - the story that we've totally got the wrong has been corrected by the man himself. (can we try not scare this poor person away like we did with TamponsEx? 
)
if Gothic can go to the trouble of setting up Google Alerts - i reckon we're all screwed with the Labour Party. how long before we get the knock at the door one night and we go missing?
tinfoil hat time.
) if Gothic can go to the trouble of setting up Google Alerts - i reckon we're all screwed with the Labour Party. how long before we get the knock at the door one night and we go missing?
tinfoil hat time.
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff