Ocean's 8, the next film we will not be allowed to criticise
Ocean's 8, the next film we will not be allowed to criticise
Author
Discussion

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

209 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
slipstream 1985 said:
Rumours are the third sex and the city movie is to be cast with men,
https://youtu.be/_4ZRpUithco

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

242 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
slipstream 1985 said:
Rumours are the third sex and the city movie is to be cast with men,
Well if SJW thought processes are followed - that should guarantee it taking $2bn at the box office as the 'patriarchy' and 'male privilege' kick in. wink

Blib

47,149 posts

220 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Noodle1982 said:
Haven't seen it. Not going to see it. I just know it's going to be st.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance—that principle is contempt prior to investigation."

Cold

16,389 posts

113 months

Tuesday 19th June 2018
quotequote all
Blib said:
Noodle1982 said:
Haven't seen it. Not going to see it. I just know it's going to be st.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance—that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
You don't need to drop a hammer onto your toe to know it will hurt.

ukaskew

10,642 posts

244 months

Tuesday 19th June 2018
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Lest we what happens on the second weekend it’s seems it’s getting panned so it will probably dive.
53%, so pretty standard, and respectable considering it was up against what turned out to be one of the biggest openings of all time (Incredibles 2).

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

242 months

Wednesday 20th June 2018
quotequote all
ukaskew said:
53%, so pretty standard, and respectable considering it was up against what turned out to be one of the biggest openings of all time (Incredibles 2).
Yep - it hasn't dropped off too badly - but neither is it flying.

Oceans 13 did the worst out of the previous movies - but even it had done $17m more by this stage and that movie released in fewer cinemas too (about 25% less).



The previous movies did about 60-65% of their box office take in foreign territories - so it will be interesting to see if the non-domestic uptake is as high for this one.

southendpier

6,021 posts

252 months

Wednesday 20th June 2018
quotequote all
Gargamel said:
You are all overlooking the gigantic turd that was Mad Max - Thunder Road.

Wonder Woman was also pretty poor, but not because of ‘S.I.W’. But because the baddies were awful and the plot more one dimensional than a plane plane on a plane
I missed it, did it come out after Mad Max Fury Road?




Halb

53,012 posts

206 months

Wednesday 20th June 2018
quotequote all
hehe

Russian Troll Bot

25,794 posts

250 months

Thursday 21st June 2018
quotequote all

Pesty

42,655 posts

279 months

Thursday 21st June 2018
quotequote all

Leicester Loyal

4,938 posts

145 months

Thursday 21st June 2018
quotequote all
It looking fking st.

Pesty

42,655 posts

279 months

Thursday 21st June 2018
quotequote all
19m gross so far in 2weeks no idea how that stacks against the others adjusted for inflation

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/browse/box-office/


Holy st solo is is going to make a huge loss by the looks of it.

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

242 months

Friday 22nd June 2018
quotequote all
Pesty said:
19m gross so far in 2weeks no idea how that stacks against the others adjusted for inflation
The chart I posted a few posts above shows the progression of domestic box office takings for all 4 films - adjusted for inflation. Oceans 8 has lagged quite a bit behind the others right throughout it's release.

The news articles above are also bullst and conveniently ignore facts like:

  • Oceans 8 was reviewed much higher than 12 and at a similar level to as 13 on Rotten Tomatoes, but has done much worse at the box office.....so the accusation that it's 'mixed reviews' (and presumably it's relatively poor performance) are primarily down to the dominance of male critics 'not understanding the movie' doesn't really hold much weight.
  • Oceans 8 has scored much lower with audiences than with critics on RT. All previous Oceans movies have scored about the same or better with audiences - whereas Oceans 8 has scored much lower (currently about 20% lower). It looks like, if anything, the 'male critics' have actually over rated the movie compared to it's male lead counterparts.
It's almost as if they are suggesting these all female sequels/reboots must be given gushing praise just because they contain an all female cast - regardless of how good the actual movie is. Perhaps instead of blaming the predominantly male critics, they should justify why they feel the movie deserved higher scores than what it actually got (especially in light of the poor audience reviews).


Edited by Moonhawk on Friday 22 June 05:43

andy_s

19,785 posts

282 months

Friday 22nd June 2018
quotequote all
Ah, male director...that's why.

techguyone

3,137 posts

165 months

Friday 22nd June 2018
quotequote all
andy_s said:
Ah, male director...that's why.
biglaugh

Xaero

4,063 posts

238 months

Friday 22nd June 2018
quotequote all
The thing is, an all female heist movie actually has a fairly decent potential. Can quite easily see them doing the same sort of thing as they did in the Oceans movies and it working well as it's not an all out action movie but intelligence involved. However because this comes across as politically correctly charged, it just has no appeal to me. Maybe that defines me as sexist, but I'm obviously not the only one. The oceans movies had Julia Roberts in playing her part too, so it wasn't exactly all male dominated.

It might have done better without the Oceans name, as that was one of the (male...) characters in the original, and this being so soon after the Ghostbusters remake (again, one I avoided for the lack of appeal, no idea if it's any good) just grinds as something being shoved down our throats by agenda.

r11co

Original Poster:

6,244 posts

253 months

Friday 22nd June 2018
quotequote all
Xaero said:
this being so soon after the Ghostbusters remake (again, one I avoided for the lack of appeal, no idea if it's any good) .
Trust me, it isn't. It set the template for a bad movie that thinks it doesn't have to try because it is agenda driven and therefor worthy. Totally unfunny, unless you like toilet humour.

gregs656

12,064 posts

204 months

Sunday 24th June 2018
quotequote all
Saw 8 last night.

They could have done so much more with it.

Rumblestripe

3,824 posts

185 months

Sunday 24th June 2018
quotequote all
Xaero said:
...just grinds as something being shoved down our throats by agenda.
Thank goodness I wasn't forced to watch it like you were. I don't think anyone is trying to force anything on anyone. You have the option not to watch it. I don't think that the movie's failure has much to do with the "agenda" it's just poor.

Perhaps the real failing of these movies is that it is lazy film making?

For example, I thought the Female Ghostbusters thing could have worked (like you think there is potential in an all female heist movie) but it was poorly written lazily written because it would be funny because it's women and they're Ghostbusters and that's hilarious... Except it isn't on it's own, it needs some funny jokes and set pieces and good editing and all the other things that go to make a good movie but it seems they thought it wouldn't matter because it's women and they're Ghostbusters!

jsc15

981 posts

231 months

Sunday 24th June 2018
quotequote all
Not seen 8, but I always thought that 12 was as solid as 11 (just with some nice Euro-locales), and 13 was a steep dive from both in terms of script and overall worthiness.

I should say that I didn't think 11 was a masterpiece, but if you've ever seen Out Of Sight (also a Soderbergh/Clooney/Cheadle pic) then this is where I'd hoped 11 would go, with a bit more grittiness/violence than the slightly empty-feeling (but great looking) pic we ended up with