Star Trek: Discovery - New series on Netflix
Star Trek: Discovery - New series on Netflix
Author
Discussion

Vipers

33,350 posts

247 months

Monday 12th February 2018
quotequote all
chris watton said:
Just watched the series finale.

I find it quite sad that the best part of the whole series for us was seeing the Enterprise right at the end

Not sure about the re-watch value of this yet...
Something fishy there. biggrin

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

249 months

Monday 12th February 2018
quotequote all
NEEEEERRRRDDDDDGASM!!!! biggrin

SpudLink

7,417 posts

211 months

Monday 12th February 2018
quotequote all
ben5575 said:
Obvs, because THAT is STARFLEET. I quite enjoyed the whole I'm Spartacus bit
After last week’s episode, I was expecting this week would be a mutiny against the new Evil Captain when the crew find out what she’s planning. Lead by Burnham, but this time with the backing of the whole crew. And for a moment I really thought Suru was going to mutiny against the Admiral.

Gavia

7,627 posts

110 months

Monday 12th February 2018
quotequote all
Totally underwhelmed by that ending

HorneyMX5

5,548 posts

169 months

Monday 12th February 2018
quotequote all
Probably the worst paced episode of the whole series. On the whole though it’s been pretty good. Looking forward to season 2, especially if it has more Tilly with straight hair in it.

essayer

10,302 posts

213 months

Monday 12th February 2018
quotequote all
Certainly a far, far better season 1 than TNG managed. Look forward to seeing where they go next

Vipers

33,350 posts

247 months

Monday 12th February 2018
quotequote all
So who jumped forward or who jumped back, my monies on someone jumped back. (If that's the right word).

Meanwhile finished watching TNG on Netflix, and now watching Babylon 5 on DVD disc set.

But roll on next series of Discovery.

Troubleatmill

10,210 posts

178 months

Monday 12th February 2018
quotequote all
Before I watched a single episode - I was expecting a 2 out of 10.
We have had some corkers - and some less impressive ones.
In the end - I think a solid 7.5 -8 out of 10.

It can't be all things to all men/ women/ LBGT whatever it is now...

Plenty of easter eggs/ references to existing series.
Most expensive actor dies - check.

Despite everyone and their dog being a critic, I thought they did well.


Or put it another way... I'm not angry/sad/etc etc/ enough to have watched every episode and posted up week on week - how it fell short.

It was good feet up on the sofa telly.

Roll on Season 2.

GravelBen

16,250 posts

249 months

Monday 12th February 2018
quotequote all
carl_w said:
Just me that found the finale a disappointment then?
Felt quite anticlimactic to me too, didn't find it particularly riveting.

Vipers

33,350 posts

247 months

SlimJim16v

7,174 posts

162 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
GravelBen said:
carl_w said:
Just me that found the finale a disappointment then?
Felt quite anticlimactic to me too, didn't find it particularly riveting.
Yep, me too. Best bit was seeing the Enterprise. Captain Pike was Kirk's predecessor, but by how many years?

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

284 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
Rumblestripe said:
Mushroom12 said:
This episode was all over the place...
I just want to try and make one thing clear thought. The grand plan was to turn the war ending WMD over to someone who was held as a PoW for weeks and had the crap kicked out of them recently, just hoping she would 'do the right thing' instead of sitting by, sipping port and watching Earth get destroyed? That was the plan right?
Edited by Mushroom12 on Monday 12th February 19:56
Err, no. That was the Admiral's plan. And no, she didn't expect her to do "the right thing", she expected her to blow the planet to bits.
You're mistakenly referring to the wrong PoW!

GravelBen

16,250 posts

249 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
Robster said:
GravelBen said:
Robster said:
Don't know how to do spoiler tags , so just going to say , latest episode was...... Mega !
Careful, people have had posts deleted and accounts suspended on this forum before for posting 'spoilers' like that.
Really for saying I liked it? Other people might hate it
Unfortunately yes, ridiculous as it sounds it happened a few times on the Game of Thrones thread. Pretty much got to the point where you couldn't post anything at all on that thread during the 12 hours or whatever it was between an episode airing internationally and in the UK, in case some oversensitive cupcake thought it was a spoiler and reported you.

Rumblestripe

3,688 posts

181 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
JamieBeeston said:
Rumblestripe said:
Mushroom12 said:
This episode was all over the place...
I just want to try and make one thing clear thought. The grand plan was to turn the war ending WMD over to someone who was held as a PoW for weeks and had the crap kicked out of them recently, just hoping she would 'do the right thing' instead of sitting by, sipping port and watching Earth get destroyed? That was the plan right?
Edited by Mushroom12 on Monday 12th February 19:56
Err, no. That was the Admiral's plan. And no, she didn't expect her to do "the right thing", she expected her to blow the planet to bits.
You're mistakenly referring to the wrong PoW!
Ah, indeed. getmecoat

The Beaver King

6,095 posts

214 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
Vipers said:
I personally can't see them doing this, not when we've had an alternative timeline create so recently with the JJ movies. It could be seen as a bit of a cop out, a la 'a wizard did it'...

They have picked a very difficult time period to set Discovery in; making a prequel is always hard, especially with something as complex and with the amount of material as Star Trek, but at least Enterprise set itself far enough back to have some wiggle room.

Speaking of which, there was a very heavy discussion on Reddit yesterday about Discovery and it's place in the Trek universe. A few people saying that most fans are viewing Discovery in the wrong light; that it shouldn't be viewed as a precursor to TOS, but as a follow on from ENT...

With that it mind, maybe the idea of a timeline split/reboot isn't so far fetched....

Lucas Ayde

4,018 posts

187 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
GravelBen said:
Felt quite anticlimactic to me too, didn't find it particularly riveting.
Yeah, bit of a let down/cop out after such an excellent build up. The resolution made absolutely no sense other than to reinforce the hackneyed 'Starfleet are a bunch of right on people who always do the principled thing' mantra that Trek likes to trot out.

Also, they totally dropped the interesting plotline of the Emperor posing as Georgiou by having her more or less give away her identity by being a total biotch to everyone else the second she got into the captain's chair.

Still, despite all that, overall a good first season that exceeded expectations.

LoonyTunes

3,362 posts

94 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
Co-creator Alex Kurtzman has explained that season two won't land until 2019 at the earliest. "Breaking story is, in some ways, the easier and faster thing; it's the ability to execute on it that's much harder. We want to take the right amount of time and don't want to rush," he outlined.

HD Adam

5,155 posts

203 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
SlimJim16v said:
Yep, me too. Best bit was seeing the Enterprise. Captain Pike was Kirk's predecessor, but by how many years?
It will be interesting.

If we see an interior shot of the Enterprise, will it be 60's low tech or Discovery high tech?

Will young Spock be there as science officer or is this before he joined Starfleet?
If so, what age will Cap'n Pike be portrayed as?

Nice to see Clint Howard, who was in the original series, as the iffy Orion slipping Tilly some Roofies in the Klingon strip club,

Jonesy23

4,650 posts

155 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
LoonyTunes said:
Co-creator Alex Kurtzman has explained that season two won't land until 2019 at the earliest. "Breaking story is, in some ways, the easier and faster thing; it's the ability to execute on it that's much harder. We want to take the right amount of time and don't want to rush," he outlined.
He's an idiot if he thinks they've built up enough support and momentum to have a break like that between seasons.

This isn't Westworld or the last season of GoT. It's an adequate TV grade Star Trek.

Dragging it out because you 'don't want to rush' is self indulgent wkery and I wouldn't expect any studio support for it.

sparks_E39

12,738 posts

232 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
HD Adam said:
SlimJim16v said:
Yep, me too. Best bit was seeing the Enterprise. Captain Pike was Kirk's predecessor, but by how many years?
It will be interesting.

If we see an interior shot of the Enterprise, will it be 60's low tech or Discovery high tech?

Will young Spock be there as science officer or is this before he joined Starfleet?
If so, what age will Cap'n Pike be portrayed as?

Nice to see Clint Howard, who was in the original series, as the iffy Orion slipping Tilly some Roofies in the Klingon strip club,
It’s already been stated that if they did do interior shots of the Enterprise it would have a Discovery look, otherwise it would be odd. I think the very little we’ve seen of the Enterprise make it look the best it ever has.

People really have to get over the whole visual thing. This a show made in 2018, it cannot look like the 1960’s! If I tuned in and saw this I’d be miffed



Much better!