Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 3]
Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 3]
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

270 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
slipstream 1985 said:
Roofless Toothless said:
I was watching the Touring Car racing yesterday, and noticed again how noisy and 'whiny' the gearboxes are.

My understanding is that this is because the racing boxes use straight cut gears while commercial gears have a 'bevelled' profile that makes them run quieter. Correct me if I am wrong.

My question is, why are straight cut gears considered more suitable for racing? Are they more efficient, transmit power more effectively, stronger?
Because race car.


Also they sound so cool!
I believe they're more efficient. Less metal-metal rubbing together.

GIYess

1,383 posts

118 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
Jonboy_t said:
An extension of Ashleyman's question;

Why does the UK still have an amber light between red and green? I understand between green and red obviously, but why do we need to 'prepare' to go, why not just 'GO!'?
Irish lights don't have an amber and for some reason it takes the mind longer to register the light has changed to green. Maybe the amber is easier to pick up in peripheral vision?

captain_cynic

15,564 posts

112 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
GIYess said:
Jonboy_t said:
An extension of Ashleyman's question;

Why does the UK still have an amber light between red and green? I understand between green and red obviously, but why do we need to 'prepare' to go, why not just 'GO!'?
Irish lights don't have an amber and for some reason it takes the mind longer to register the light has changed to green. Maybe the amber is easier to pick up in peripheral vision?
We do perceive orange and yellow colours the quickest.

I'm not sure if this is true, but I've always assumed that the yellow flash before green had to do with warning people to prepare to set off. It was there to give you a second to put the car into gear and take the handbrake off. Australia doesn't have a yellow flash and goes straight from red to green, UK traffic sets off a lot faster than Australian traffic.

dave_s13

13,946 posts

286 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
Sprinkler heads mounted on every 3rd fence post at a polar bear enclosure at Yorkshire wildlife park.



Is it to stop the cunning bears from burning the fence down or what??


Gad-Westy

15,876 posts

230 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
slipstream 1985 said:
Roofless Toothless said:
I was watching the Touring Car racing yesterday, and noticed again how noisy and 'whiny' the gearboxes are.

My understanding is that this is because the racing boxes use straight cut gears while commercial gears have a 'bevelled' profile that makes them run quieter. Correct me if I am wrong.

My question is, why are straight cut gears considered more suitable for racing? Are they more efficient, transmit power more effectively, stronger?
Because race car.


Also they sound so cool!
I believe they're more efficient. Less metal-metal rubbing together.
As roothelss toothless says, it's because the force of one gear turning another is direct where helical gears are imparting side load component on each other as well. Interestingly, the noise you hear is oil being squeezed out of the gap rather than the noise of gears meshing. Obvious when you think about it but it's not something that you necessarily equate when you hear that whining noise.

Super Slo Mo

5,371 posts

215 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
Gad-Westy said:
SpeckledJim said:
slipstream 1985 said:
Roofless Toothless said:
I was watching the Touring Car racing yesterday, and noticed again how noisy and 'whiny' the gearboxes are.

My understanding is that this is because the racing boxes use straight cut gears while commercial gears have a 'bevelled' profile that makes them run quieter. Correct me if I am wrong.

My question is, why are straight cut gears considered more suitable for racing? Are they more efficient, transmit power more effectively, stronger?
Because race car.


Also they sound so cool!
I believe they're more efficient. Less metal-metal rubbing together.
As roothelss toothless says, it's because the force of one gear turning another is direct where helical gears are imparting side load component on each other as well. Interestingly, the noise you hear is oil being squeezed out of the gap rather than the noise of gears meshing. Obvious when you think about it but it's not something that you necessarily equate when you hear that whining noise.
Didn’t know that about the oil. I understood that they were also stronger on a like for like basis as well as being more efficient.

FiF

47,056 posts

268 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
Maybe this is one for the IT forum but here goes.

Telegraph site is behind paywall. Reading on my phone and premium articles are behind said paywall. On my tablet they are not.

I do not have an account, well technically it's not been renewed as the quality of their journalism is so dire.

Anyway both phone and tablet are Android. confused

glazbagun

14,964 posts

214 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
I believe the Telegraph allow a number of free views. If you clear the cookies on your blocked device, it may also give you them again.

I also note that many blockers use a flash (or something) overlay. If it is disabled on your browser it may not pop up. Like what happened when Wiki went down in protest about Net Neutrality.

Exige77

6,523 posts

208 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
Super Slo Mo said:
Gad-Westy said:
SpeckledJim said:
slipstream 1985 said:
Roofless Toothless said:
I was watching the Touring Car racing yesterday, and noticed again how noisy and 'whiny' the gearboxes are.

My understanding is that this is because the racing boxes use straight cut gears while commercial gears have a 'bevelled' profile that makes them run quieter. Correct me if I am wrong.

My question is, why are straight cut gears considered more suitable for racing? Are they more efficient, transmit power more effectively, stronger?
Because race car.


Also they sound so cool!
I believe they're more efficient. Less metal-metal rubbing together.
As roothelss toothless says, it's because the force of one gear turning another is direct where helical gears are imparting side load component on each other as well. Interestingly, the noise you hear is oil being squeezed out of the gap rather than the noise of gears meshing. Obvious when you think about it but it's not something that you necessarily equate when you hear that whining noise.
Didn’t know that about the oil. I understood that they were also stronger on a like for like basis as well as being more efficient.
Stronger and less transmission losses but no one cares about that, just listen to that noise !!

mko9

2,819 posts

229 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
Willy Nilly said:
If those two people that got poisoned in Salisbury recover, will there be any long term damage done to them?
Quite possibly/probably. That stuff is a potent nerve agent that is supposed to kill you because of what it does to your nervous system. They obviously got a less than lethal dose, it just depends on how much of a dose they actually got. But it could permanently affect the heart or lungs, for example.

Look about half way down under "Effects": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novichok_agent

"novichok agents may cause lasting nerve damage"

"He was critically injured and took ten days to recover consciousness after the incident. He lost the ability to walk and was treated at a secret clinic in Leningrad for three months afterwards. The agent caused permanent harm, with effects that included "chronic weakness in his arms, a toxic hepatitis that gave rise to cirrhosis of the liver, epilepsy, spells of severe depression, and an inability to read or concentrate that left him totally disabled and unable to work." He never recovered and died in July 1992 after five years of deteriorating health."

glazbagun

14,964 posts

214 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
What was the last car produced with this style of flick switch (though I believe this is a 3-way) on the dashboard?



Edited by glazbagun on Monday 9th April 22:38

talksthetorque

10,820 posts

152 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
What was the last car produced with this style of flick switch (though I believe this is a 3-way) on the dashboard?



Edited by glazbagun on Monday 9th April 22:38
Still in production - Current Mini


glenrobbo

38,187 posts

167 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
Why do they call it a "Mini" when it's so bloody huge: about the same size as a Range Rover Evoque?

talksthetorque

10,820 posts

152 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
I can help with that one too:

£££


Ayahuasca

27,503 posts

296 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
What was the last car produced with this style of flick switch (though I believe this is a 3-way) on the dashboard?



Edited by glazbagun on Monday 9th April 22:38
Morgan three-wheelers have them too.

Halmyre

12,047 posts

156 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
talksthetorque said:
glazbagun said:
What was the last car produced with this style of flick switch (though I believe this is a 3-way) on the dashboard?



Edited by glazbagun on Monday 9th April 22:38
Still in production - Current Mini
ISTR they were 'banned' and rocker switches became the norm. Who remembers these?



http://www.s-v-c.co.uk/product/speedwell-switch-ex...

FerdiZ28

1,355 posts

151 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
glenrobbo said:
Why do they call it a "Mini" when it's so bloody huge: about the same size as a Range Rover Evoque?
Marketing & prevalence of easily-sold-to hipsters.

Super Slo Mo

5,371 posts

215 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
FerdiZ28 said:
glenrobbo said:
Why do they call it a "Mini" when it's so bloody huge: about the same size as a Range Rover Evoque?
Marketing & prevalence of easily-sold-to hipsters.
It’s just a brand name these days surely.

V8mate

45,899 posts

206 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
Super Slo Mo said:
FerdiZ28 said:
glenrobbo said:
Why do they call it a "Mini" when it's so bloody huge: about the same size as a Range Rover Evoque?
Marketing & prevalence of easily-sold-to hipsters.
It’s just a brand name these days surely.
Exactly. You don't get a bit of the red planet when you buy a Mars.

glenrobbo

38,187 posts

167 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
V8mate said:
Super Slo Mo said:
FerdiZ28 said:
glenrobbo said:
Why do they call it a "Mini" when it's so bloody huge: about the same size as a Range Rover Evoque?
Marketing & prevalence of easily-sold-to hipsters.
It’s just a brand name these days surely.
Exactly. You don't get a bit of the red planet when you buy a Mars.
scratchchin No doubt all you hot-blooded males out there are looking forward to the reveal of this season's new "miniskirt"?



CALL me old fashioned, but I prefer to see the original 1960's version
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED