OSX Finder app with tree structure
OSX Finder app with tree structure
Author
Discussion

durbster

Original Poster:

11,779 posts

245 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
Does anyone know of a Finder alternative that displays folders in a non-linear way e.g. the tree structure in Windows Explorer?

I do a lot of file management with deep folder structures, and it's driving me nuts having to navigate through folder structures one at a time. I've tried a few Finder alternatives and am currently reaching the end of a PathFinder trial, but I'd rather not pay for it if there's something that has non-linear navigation.

Amazingly Google seems to suggest there isn't such a thing but I seriously can't believe that.

mmm-five

12,062 posts

307 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
If you mean 'tree structure' as in having an expanding folder structure on the click of an arrow/plus sign on the left of the folder name, then OSX can do it natively, as long as you change your view preferences from Column/Thumbnail/Icon to List.

Just click the expand triangle next to the folder name to show the contents as a hierarchy.


durbster

Original Poster:

11,779 posts

245 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
Yeah sorry, I do mean that tree structure but in Finder (and Path Finder) you can only operate within one folder at a time.

So for example, in this screenshot the files in the right pane can be dragged directly into any folder by expanding the tree structure in the left pane.


To do the same in Finder you either have to copy, navigate, paste; drag the files through the tree one level at a time; or have multiple windows open. The latter is the quickest but I'm not keen on having lots of windows open if I can avoid it.

LordGrover

34,030 posts

235 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
MacExplorer looks the part but expensive (to me) for what it is: click.

BlueMR2

9,260 posts

225 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
You mean like this?

durbster

Original Poster:

11,779 posts

245 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
MacExplorer looks the part but expensive (to me) for what it is: click.
That looks like it'll do. It is a bit expensive but Path Finder's 25 odd quid too.

Thanks very much.

mmm-five

12,062 posts

307 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
I see what you need now. Have you tried Xfile?


LordGrover

34,030 posts

235 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
I saw that one, but 40? yikes

mmm-five

12,062 posts

307 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
I saw that one, but 40? yikes
Yes, but if one can save a couple of hours by using this instead of the standard Finder, then surely it'll pay for itself in a short time.

durbster

Original Poster:

11,779 posts

245 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
XFile looks like it may be overkill as I'm really just moving code about but I'll have a look anyway.

This is for work so as long as I can justify it to the boss the price shouldn't be a major issue. Having said that, I'm not sure how I will justify it to the boss - I already had to explain that Dreamweaver is not the ultimate coding application so I could buy Textmate (I tried Coda but that really is too expensive).

Incidentally, did you know about these already or find them? I had a fruitless scout around on Google but after reading comments on the PathFinder website, the people there seemed to think such a thing didn't exist on OSX.

LordGrover

34,030 posts

235 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
Just googled, me.

TonyRPH

13,459 posts

191 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
mmm-five said:
I see what you need now. Have you tried Xfile?

Impressive - this is really quick.

Looks like I'm going to have to buy a licence now.



TheHeretic

73,668 posts

278 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
Well, in finder, I find it is easier to simply use the list option, thusly wussly...



And then rather than navigating to the bit you want to on the left, [i]then[i] dragging, just pick up the file you want, and then drag it where you want. Folder will open, and open the next one, etc, until you get where you need to be, which is not particularly different, I don't think, unless I've grasped the wrong end of the stick?


Globs

13,847 posts

254 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
Well, in finder, I find it is easier to simply use the list option, thusly wussly...



And then rather than navigating to the bit you want to on the left, [i]then[i] dragging, just pick up the file you want, and then drag it where you want. Folder will open, and open the next one, etc, until you get where you need to be, which is not particularly different, I don't think, unless I've grasped the wrong end of the stick?
Also I just drag folders into the 'quick use list' on the far left of the finder, very handy.

LordGrover

34,030 posts

235 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
Favorites? [sic]

yes Very useful tip.

durbster

Original Poster:

11,779 posts

245 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
Globs said:
Also I just drag folders into the 'quick use list' on the far left of the finder, very handy.
Yep, I do that for my main folders but this is more to do with moving files around in subfolders e.g. copying a template from one subfolder to a new project.

@TheHeretic My folder structure tends to be at least 7 or 8 levels deep so it's a bit awkward to hold the mouse button down while you drag, pause until open, drag, pause until open etc. With a deep folder structure it's much quicker to use a tree to expand the target folder in preparation then drag the file in one go.

Thanks all, much appreciated.

Dracoro

8,981 posts

268 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
Why not just have 2 finder windows open, one to source the files and other being the destination then you don't have to wait for the folders to open (although I'm sure you can re-configure the delay time when dragging to a folder)....

LordGrover

34,030 posts

235 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
durbster said:
... The latter is the quickest but I'm not keen on having lots of windows open if I can avoid it.

RoadRailer

599 posts

251 months

Friday 16th March 2012
quotequote all
TonyRPH said:
mmm-five said:
I see what you need now. Have you tried Xfile?

Impressive - this is really quick.

Looks like I'm going to have to buy a licence now.
I can't recommend the full ACP toolset enough, Xfile is blisteringly fast, the rest of the ACP is writen to the same high standards.