Vectra injectors fitted to a NA 4.6.

Vectra injectors fitted to a NA 4.6.

Author
Discussion

haircutmike

Original Poster:

21,844 posts

204 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
I have just fitted a set of cleaned and matched Vectra injectors to my 4.6 chim.

Chimpofdarkness/tonic/frollic has these already fitted to his 4.0 but runs a MA chip iirc.

The vectra flow 250 cubic thingies as opposed to the Lucas 200.

I am running the standard Lucas jobby with an adjustable regulator that was increased to run the Vectra units.

I had every reason to believe that this may not be compatable with the Lucas system but thought I would give it a whirl before going MS.

First graph is running standard Lucas injectors.



2nd graph running Vectra injectors.



Torque starts sooner and is a much "fatter" curve as well as improved.

Power is slightly up, rises without a slight dip and moves peak power further up the rev range.

JonyTVR

2,548 posts

189 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
very interesting! looks like it somehow gives a cleaner flow of fuel! you noticed any difference in terms of driving? smoother? less lumpy etc?

Alexdaredevilz

5,697 posts

179 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
I'm more intrested to see the massive results your going to get with a Ecu

Brummmie

5,284 posts

221 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Good gain in torque, does it drive alot stronger?

haircutmike

Original Poster:

21,844 posts

204 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Yes, I am sure MS or similar will give a little gain and no doubt a bit of economy as well.

As to driving, very smooth, absolutely no shunting or hesitation and pulls smoothly up to 7K!

Flooring the throttle in 5th at 90 gives instant pickup and sees 140 in what seems like a few seconds, (on my special test track).

dbv8

8,655 posts

220 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
A lot more to come with mapping. Show us the AFR graph Peter

haircutmike

Original Poster:

21,844 posts

204 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
dbv8 said:
A lot more to come with mapping. Show us the AFR graph Peter
Will do when I'm back later.

ChimpofDarkness

9,637 posts

179 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Nice one Peter clap

On the basis of your impressive results I will be fitting an adjustable fuel pressure regulator as part of my new Canems engine management installation biggrin

This will make fuel pressure another parameter to work with when we map the new system and should allow me to take full advantage of the Vecta injectors for the first time since I fitted them two years ago rolleyes

Bye Bye distributor, 14CUX & Mr Mark Adams wavey

It's time for me to embrace the future cool

Ribol

11,276 posts

258 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
haircutmike said:
The vectra flow 250 cubic thingies as opposed to the Lucas 200.
Did your originals have a few miles/squirts under their belts or still working at their best would you say?

In other words is your feeling that the improvement is entirely down to swapping for a different type or a bit of both?

Simon says

18,961 posts

221 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Ribol said:
haircutmike said:
The vectra flow 250 cubic thingies as opposed to the Lucas 200.
Did your originals have a few miles/squirts under their belts or still working at their best would you say?

In other words is your feeling that the improvement is entirely down to swapping for a different type or a bit of both?
yes I would say a bit of both probably scratchchin but the Vectra/Bosch lookalikeies have a far superior spray pattern coupled with the fact he is pushing the duty cycle of the Hotwire/Sagem inj's out of their comfort zone at those outputs eek

Ribol

11,276 posts

258 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Simon says said:
yes I would say a bit of both probably scratchchin but the Vectra/Bosch lookalikeies have a far superior spray pattern coupled with the fact he is pushing the duty cycle of the Hotwire/Sagem inj's out of their comfort zone at those outputs eek
........... and the requirements of a 4.6 which IIRC is not exactly standard so probably looking for a bit more anyway?

Simon says

18,961 posts

221 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Ribol said:
Simon says said:
yes I would say a bit of both probably scratchchin but the Vectra/Bosch lookalikeies have a far superior spray pattern coupled with the fact he is pushing the duty cycle of the Hotwire/Sagem inj's out of their comfort zone at those outputs eek
........... and the requirements of a 4.6 which IIRC is not exactly standard so probably looking for a bit more anyway?
This is true wink especially seeing as the Hotwire inj's were not originally specced for the 4.6 never mind a tuned version, and the way i see it if the disc/hosing design was so good every manufacturer would have jumped on the band wagon scratchchin it's nice knowing all these little improvements can still be found with the old RV8 and cheap too thumbup


Edited by Simon says on Sunday 24th June 15:19

Alexdaredevilz

5,697 posts

179 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Just look at the torque/hp curve! Must be a really good cam in there!

ChimpofDarkness

9,637 posts

179 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Peter, following Simon's comments you need to be taking the 350 challenge wink

That would be 76hp per litre......... from a normally aspirated RV8 yikes

It's possible 350 would put you at very the top of the 4.6 tree smokin



Personally I'm taking the 268 challenge on my baby 4.0 litre tongue out

My last dyno run proven 238 on the 14CUX with dizzy & Stealth cam, & that was before I junked the very restrictive main cat & fitted an ACT Y piece.

Even as a conservative estimate that one change alone felt like an immediate 10hp gain on my bum dyno.


So here's my logic:

Lets start with my dyno proven 238 base, add 10 from the ACT Y peice plus a conservative 20 from my Canems.

= 268hp

Could that mean with decent pair of heads & some other inlet side improvements the mythical 75hp per litre 300hp 4.0 litre is no longer just a dream?

haircutmike

Original Poster:

21,844 posts

204 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
My stage 4 heads, shortened and bored Trumpets and ported manifold gave the biggest increasen about 40+ iirc!

ChimpofDarkness

9,637 posts

179 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
haircutmike said:
My stage 4 heads, shortened and bored Trumpets and ported manifold gave the biggest increasen about 40+ iirc!
Ok, that does it, I'm aiming for the first 300hp 4.0 litre then.


domV8

1,375 posts

181 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Question Mike -

Do you have to run Super Unleaded with your high-compression set-up, or is it safe on 95..?

Thanks,

Dom

haircutmike

Original Poster:

21,844 posts

204 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
I've never run ordinaire!

domV8

1,375 posts

181 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
...but does the compression ration require you to run super..?

carsy

3,018 posts

165 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Good news Peter. Didnt you initially have problems running too rich with them. How did you manage to overcome this.