Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S)

Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S)

Author
Discussion

samoht

Original Poster:

5,751 posts

147 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
A long time ago, before Gran Turismo was a gleam in Yamauchi's eye, before Initial D sanctified RWD, before I was out of shorts let alone behind the wheel, I read in Autocar & Motor about the latest in the nineties wave of science-fiction Japanese sports cars. No computer-controlled 4wd here, but it did feature obsessive weight reduction and two turbochargers that worked in sequence. How did they get the turbo valves to open and close at the right time? My 12-year-old brain struggled to work it all out. The brand new and very curvy Mazda RX-7 FD was beautiful, focused and super-cool.

Eleven years later in rural Japan, I got a passenger ride in one. While it wasn't as dramatic as a flame-spitting Skyline, it felt smooth, planted and very, very right. Moreover, the styling was incredible close-up - all subtly defined bulging forms melding purposefully one into another, with the classic double-bubble roof. That it felt cramped inside compared to my own Silvia only made it seem more special. Later I visited Mazda HQ in Hiroshima, saw the green-and-orange 787B, and felt how the quest to productionise the rotary engine is intimately tied up with the resurrection of this elegant, beautifully sited city.

Then a fellow Nissan-owner spoke with the enthusiasm of a convert, about just how special his new FD made him feel, how comparing numbers with S-bodies tells you nothing of what it feels like to drive. I looked, noted the fuel consumption and reliability challenges, admired from afar and continued with my economical four-pot turbo Nissan.

More recently, a combination of modestly rising pay and falling annual mileage allowed me to think I might be able to run a rotary. When I close my eyes and imagine my dream car, it is a curvaceous coupe, with a short, powerful engine nestled behind the front wheels, driving the rears. A Corvette was LHD and too expensive, a Cerbera even more scary to own, while a test drive in a GT86 proved that I couldn't go cold turkey on torque. The RX-7 FD was looking like the one.

A little research suggested that I should look for a fairly standard later-model car owned by a knowledgeable enthusiast, with good compression results. I just missed out on a rather nice blue '99-spec fresh import at £7,750, then saw a black '96 up for £4,750. Rebuilt five years ago and with nice high, even compression results, this car had been with the same guy for years, serviced twice a year at a rotary specialist. The seller took me for a drive (I couldn't sort insurance to test drive a modified car, albeit just catback and panel filter). He apologised for not being able to really push it in the wet, then promptly ran us up to over the ton on a sweeping A-road, car feeling totally planted. Everything seemed to check out, so we agreed on £4,500 and I paid over the cash on the spot - lucky really, since we'd barely finished counting the fifties when his phone rang with another buyer offering to take it.

Now I’m finally behind the wheel of my very own FD, and it is every bit as special as I’d been told. The 13B motor knows neither vibration nor harshness, only how to pull and pull with such ready willingness that the 7k beep comes as a rude surprise. The whole car moves instantly and linearly with the steering, with no delay - the sense of absolute control is similar to holding a toy car under the palm of your hand. The brakes, larger ones on my Type RS, reassure instantly. The smooth power and seemingly-invincible chassis make 100mph feel like the natural cruising gait (this may yet turn out to be a problem). While it makes speed natural, it never feels boring - you are intimately connected to the car.

I've already ruled out body kits, coilovers, or messing with the sequential turbo operation that blew my mind twenty years ago. Future plans are basically reliability mods so that I can take her on trackdays without fearing blowing the engine - I can't wait to see how this chassis feels at Cadwell Park.

So yes, I have a new love. And ultimately, I think that’s what PH-ness is all about :-)

"Aero wave" double-bubble roofline


Lure of the open road


50/50 weight distribution


Shades of the TVR Tuscan in this bonnet


Even the wing mirrors are elegantly sculpted. Everything on this car has been thought about and designed by someone who cared.


Dished Nardi wheel succeeds in giving me knee clearance. However, although the speedometer is clearly visible in this shot, it isn't from my driving position (!) A phone app helps here.


Oh, and I've also taken the chance to pick up this, which I really like


1996 Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S)

Power: 265hp
Torque: 217 lb ft
Weight: 1270kg

Changes from OEM spec:
Racing Beat cat-back exhaust
Panel filter
99-spec rear spoiler
Nardi steering wheel

Edited by samoht on Thursday 30th June 23:05

scoobydude

87 posts

170 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Fantastic looking car and great write up, enjoy

Disco You

3,685 posts

181 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
And now I need to change my underwear... Thanks.

TotalControl

8,081 posts

199 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
That really is a lovely example you have there.

deuchars

260 posts

216 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Looks stunning, don't ruin it with body kits etc

Mastodon2

13,826 posts

166 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Looks a nice car. If it beeps at 7000rpm, where is the redline? What is the limiter set at?

Such a clean car, seems almost a shame to take it on the track.

obob

4,193 posts

195 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Beautiful, too scared to get one myself.

You really need to do something about that front plate though.Either a smaller one (a little illegal) or a Jap style plate to one side

Marf

22,907 posts

242 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Mastodon2 said:
If it beeps at 7000rpm, where is the redline? What is the limiter set at?
8000RPM.

At least it is on my '96 RS biggrin

Nice car Tom wink Looked good over at Super7 last weekend.

More likely she's making 280bhp+, mine's totally standard and there's a recent dyno sheet showing 283hp smile

Like you I've recently test drove a GT86, but the price/performance ratio wasn't right for me either.

Edited by Marf on Saturday 24th November 16:10

heisthegaffer

3,427 posts

199 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Lovely car mate, I remember when they came out too. So beautiful, actually the most beautiful Jap car ever I think.

You're very lucky to have found a great example. If these aren't a future classic I'll eat my hat!

DanielSan

18,822 posts

168 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
The most important question of all. How bad is it on fuel really?

Mastodon2

13,826 posts

166 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Marf said:
8000RPM.

At least it is on my '96 RS biggrin

Nice car Tom wink Looked good over at Super7 last weekend.

More likely she's making 280bhp+, mine's totally standard and there's a recent dyno sheet showing 283hp smile

Like you I've recently test drove a GT86, but the price/performance ratio wasn't right for me either.

Edited by Marf on Saturday 24th November 16:10
Wow, I thought it would rev a bit higher than that.

Marf

22,907 posts

242 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Doesn't need to smile

Unlike the RX8 these have torque tongue out

Codswallop

5,250 posts

195 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Beautiful car OP. The RS wheels and wing really complete the look of the car imo.

What "reliability" mods have you got in mind?

JonnyFive

29,401 posts

190 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Brilliant write up!

Lovely choice of car.

Mr Viking

90 posts

138 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Glad to hear you're anti bodykit. I think these have one of the most beautiful shapes in a modern(ish) car and it makes my heart sink every time I see one that has had ill advised modifications carried out. Best of luck and I hope she treats you well

GBTurbo

247 posts

172 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Fantastic. Never been in one. Saw one at a petrol station about 3 years ago. Sounded great. Enjoy

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

209 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Very nice! Looks like a good example.

Marf said:
Doesn't need to smile

Unlike the RX8 these have torque tongue out
Where's your readers cars thread? How's your fd mate? Loving it? smile

Craigwww

853 posts

170 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Great write and up and lovely car. Miss mine a little reading that but I did ruin it with massive engine mods and converting to single turbo. It was 509bhp, a monster on the road but a monster to drive too. It never drove better than when it was standard.. so dont be tempted, keep it clean and standard, thats when they are at their best.

Craigwww

853 posts

170 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Great write and up and lovely car. Miss mine a little reading that but I did ruin it with massive engine mods and converting to single turbo. It was 509bhp, a monster on the road but a monster to drive too. It never drove better than when it was standard.. so dont be tempted, keep it clean and standard, thats when they are at their best.

Craigwww

853 posts

170 months

Saturday 24th November 2012
quotequote all
Great write and up and lovely car. Miss mine a little reading that but I did ruin it with massive engine mods and converting to single turbo. It was 509bhp, a monster on the road but a monster to drive too. It never drove better than when it was standard.. so dont be tempted, keep it clean and standard, thats when they are at their best.