RE: Ford Fiesta Black Edition: Driven (briefly)

RE: Ford Fiesta Black Edition: Driven (briefly)

Thursday 19th June 2014

Ford Fiesta Black Edition: Driven (briefly)

140hp from 999cc. In a production car. Is this a junior ST?



Not so long ago, editor Dan was extolling the virtues of the Suzuki Swift Sport - the last stand for the naturally aspirated performance hatch. We will not see its like again.

Contemplating the alternatives, the obvious - and most up-to-the-minute - option was the Ford Fiesta Zetec S, with its 1.0-litre Ecoboost turbo engine. But 125hp isn't quite a match for the cheaper Swift's 136, while the five-speed 'box and less focused chassis just don't offer the same intensity as Suzuki's six-speed and 1.6 that almost insists on a flogging.

Black with red or Red with black. Got it?
Black with red or Red with black. Got it?
Fine. But what if we told you Ford has now launched a 1.0-litre Fiesta with 140hp?

Numbers game
There are a few slightly bonkers things going on here. For starters, the car in question has been wheeled out at Ford's Lommel proving ground in Belgium, so time on board is limited to a couple of test laps - amusingly including a section of ride evaluation surfacing exactly modelled after Lower Dunton Road in Essex (thank Richard Parry Jones for that).

On top of which, Ford is only prepared to sell you this engine specification as part of a Red Edition or Black Edition package. Mirror images of each other, these three-door cars are - you guessed it - red and black, with contrasting details in the opposite colour. The Red is tolerable; the Black, well, you be the judge.

Well it should look complicated at 140hp/litre
Well it should look complicated at 140hp/litre
Then consider some of the numbers. 140hp from 999cc is a higher specific output than the Bugatti Veyron - yet the increase comes through recalibration alone. Ford has, however, fitted sports suspension and closer-ratio gears. Shame there's still only five of them, and that the 8.7-second Swift remains quicker to 62mph.

But if the 9.0-second sprint seems a little disheartening, compensation comes in the form of 104g/km CO2 meaning you'll pay just 20 quid a year in tax. 62.8mpg also sounds appealing, if not something you're ever likely to actually see - even with 155lb ft of torque to help move things along. There's just too much fun to be had wringing the tiny triple's entertainingly enthusiastic neck.

An ST in the making
The aim is to keep it on boost at all possible cost - which makes it a similar but different experience to the rev-hungry Swift because once you're dug into the torque you don't necessarily need to nail the limiter every time: you just want to. The thrummy three-cylinder vocals only encourage this degree of attack.

Fiesta's engaging handling unchanged
Fiesta's engaging handling unchanged
The steering is relatively meaty, and while there's enough body roll to suggest both friendly adjustability and a ride that isn't going to hammer you like the Fiesta ST, the Ecoboost 140 feels feisty, controlled and determined to tackle your chosen line. Like a more refined Renaultsport Twingo. Though there are no tricky ST front-end electronics, it changes direction with an eagerness that almost makes it seem flighty at first, but should quickly become a nimble route to rapid progress.

With an interior bedecked with more bespoke black and red detailing - thankfully applied with moderate taste - it appears every bit the gap-bridging junior ST. And the kind of car that basically defines why power really isn't everything.

Trouble is, at £15,995 it doesn't half make the £13,999 three-door Swift Sport look even more tempting.


FORD FIESTA RED EDITION / BLACK EDITION
Engine:
999cc 3-cyl turbo
Transmission: 5-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 140@N/Arpm
Torque (lb ft): 155@N/Arpm
0-62mph: 9.0sec
Top speed: 125mph
Weight: 1091kg (125hp 1.0 Ecoboost)
MPG: 62.8 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 104g/km
Price: £15,995





Author
Discussion

GTEYE

Original Poster:

2,096 posts

210 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
Looks like a decent little car, kind of like a modern day AX GT.

I don't think the red detailing looks that bad actually...

And while £16k sounds quite a lot, factor in some discounts and it might make more sense. And its somewhat more affordable than those £40k+ Golfs and the like, and more than likely punching above its weight in the fun stakes.



Edited by GTEYE on Wednesday 18th June 10:09

MikeG88

148 posts

133 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
Oh thats goo....

£16,000?!

Well, you could have an ST for a little more.

Rewind back to when I was 19 years old and I bought a Clio GT 128hp. The reason I bought it was because the Renaultsport 200 would have made life rather un comfy for me financially as a part time retail worker at uni thanks to insurance. Thanks to the GT I had plenty of spare cash for beer etc and the car, admittedly after Id had it on coilovers and setup properly, was absolutely great. Should imagine this is a lot of fun, though the price is a little eyebrow raising.

keiran

39 posts

194 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
I'm sure I'm not the first person to say this, but...

Fit this spec engine into the KA , call it the KA ST, finish it off with a tasteful sporty look and an affordable price, and there you have it, an Abarth 500 rival, which will likely sell well...
(Then a more powerful version KA RS? to rival the 595 or 695 Abarth or whatever it's called)

There you are ford, I will await my cheque in the post...

Also, I'm sure Aston Martin would like their Colour scheme and Grille back...



Edited by keiran on Wednesday 18th June 09:55


Edited by keiran on Wednesday 18th June 09:56


Edited by keiran on Thursday 19th June 00:40

will-w

252 posts

201 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
I should imagine the agreement between Ford and Fiat would stop things like that happening wink

I can't imagine Fiat would like making a car in their own plant for a rival, that could potentially break their successful Abarth 500/595 sales figures

dlockhart

434 posts

172 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
I quite like this honest nippy and frugal, 16k is not massively cheap but the swift isn't that much cheaper

Limpet

6,309 posts

161 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
Impressive engine, but it's a bit depressing that 140 bhp in a "small" car only gives 0-60 in 9 secs.


timmeh2k

80 posts

152 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
I wonder how easy it would be to get hold of that engine to put in my classic mini, 140bhp 700kg hellllloooo

Reavenger

129 posts

133 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
I don't understand why they wouldn't put a 6 speed box in there and give the economy a bigger boost.

Doesn't look too bad on the outside and to get 140bhp out of 1 litre is impressive. I think the interior looks horrible though and I can't stand it. Very busy and aesthetically pleasing at all.

theJT

313 posts

185 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
timmeh2k said:
I wonder how easy it would be to get hold of that engine to put in my classic mini, 140bhp 700kg hellllloooo
I imagine not that easy. As I understand it the little ecoboost triple is quite small in overall volume, but rather tall. With the mini's low bonnet line I think it might be rather difficult to make it fit.

Prawnboy

1,326 posts

147 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
this 3 pot just gets better and every time i think V6 in the mondeo, (2L and 280bhp sweet)

IntriguedUser

989 posts

121 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
Limpet said:
Impressive engine, but it's a bit depressing that 140 bhp in a "small" car only gives 0-60 in 9 secs.
Wonder if 9 seconds is accurate?

Seems a tad, slow though?



LOW4LYFE

159 posts

121 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
Does seem slow, taking HP/torque/weight into account. Guess it must be the gearing?



vrooom

3,763 posts

267 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
damn, that's progress. My first car was 999cc fiat, it has beastly 45hp and takes 16sec to reach 60mph.. that was only 20 ish years ago...

Dave Hedgehog

14,550 posts

204 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
the red accents on the black car look good imo

llyrowenjones

60 posts

134 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
That 0-60 time is a bit slow. Looks great though, you see Zetec S' everywhere, these ones should sell like hot cakes. Might be cheap on insurance as well being such a small engine and not "super fast".

renaultgeek

473 posts

148 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
looks good provided one of them doesn't have the opposite of black seats with the red detailing in the photo

seefarr

1,467 posts

186 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
The BHP/L doesn't seem that impressive to me. My last car was a 2004 running 190 BHP/L quite happily.

Huntsman

8,054 posts

250 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
We have a Fiesta , 4 months old, I asked if they could do it on the 14" wheels that the base model has as I felt the 15" would be too bumpy on the dreadful roads we have. Ford said they could not do it, so we have the 15".

Its far too hard and bumpy on our roads, to the point that we find it really wearing. I suspect this will be the killer in 18 months time when we come to renew the car.

If this black edition has got firmer suspension like the ST I would be inclined to think that it would be horrid to drive, even more so with bigger wheels and low profile tyres.


dukebox9reg

1,571 posts

148 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
Remaps on the standard 100/125bhp engine from various tuners have been giving 150bhp out of these for a while now and I've not seen many issues reported.

Even the not so much loved Bluefin gives 154bhp and at least its removable come service time.

Agree with other comments, the tq, bhp and weight figures do seem to add up to sub 9 for 60.

The new Mini Cooper with 135ish(I think) is in the 7's

Mr Will

13,719 posts

206 months

Wednesday 18th June 2014
quotequote all
Limpet said:
Impressive engine, but it's a bit depressing that 140 bhp in a "small" car only gives 0-60 in 9 secs.
I have a funny feeling they may be sand-bagging for insurance purposes. Either that or it requires a gear change at ~59mph (possibly for similar reasons)