Cold & mobile cameras
Cold & mobile cameras
Author
Discussion

Iandk

Original Poster:

26 posts

269 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
I got a fresh SP30 after 20yrs. I was just keeping up with traffic.

‘’Everyone here is innocent” shawshank redemption.

It’s a good thing too, I was beginning to be a bit of an Audi driver. I’m quite pleased really, I entered the cold snap with a really light right foot and the M5 is a fairly decent car in the cold if you drive it with virtually no throttle. Had I not been given a ticket so recently I reckon I would have misjudged the cold and got it really wrong. So I suppose thanks to the system.

Meanwhile these new openly published traffic speed tolerances and huge fines....does anyone know what the accuracy of a bmw speedo is? I had to use a 30mph zone late at night today on a 60 mph patch. I did the speed required and had a queue from hell behind me. What can you do...??


AW10

4,610 posts

270 months

Friday 1st February 2019
quotequote all
Iandk said:
...does anyone know what the accuracy of a bmw speedo is? I had to use a 30mph zone late at night today on a 60 mph patch. I did the speed required and had a queue from hell behind me. What can you do...??
A GPS provides an accurate speed measurement if you're driving at constant speed and where it has a decent view of the sky. Speedos generally read a few mph low.

helix402

7,913 posts

203 months

Friday 1st February 2019
quotequote all
Speedos over read (for example if 30mph is displayed you may be going 28mph). If you have Carly for BMW you can add a digital speedo to your cluster which you can choose to display real or “corrected” (over reading speed as displayed in the traditional speedo).

Max Maxasson

440 posts

204 months

Friday 1st February 2019
quotequote all
My M4s speedo runs pretty much exactly 2 mph fast.
I run cameralert on my iphone x with the screen in standby...so it just chirps up when a camera is in range and facing you.
Cameralert has been around for years and the camera positions are crowdsourced...subscription based but find a new camera and get free subs for life.

JMBMWM5

2,383 posts

219 months

Friday 1st February 2019
quotequote all

Andy OH

1,959 posts

271 months

Friday 1st February 2019
quotequote all
AW10 said:
A GPS provides an accurate speed measurement if you're driving at constant speed and where it has a decent view of the sky. Speedos generally read a few mph low.
Are you quite sure that's correct? I've never seen a speedo read a few mph low? I've tested most of my recent cars with GPS and the speedo reads around 2 mph faster.

AW10

4,610 posts

270 months

Friday 1st February 2019
quotequote all
Andy OH said:
Are you quite sure that's correct? I've never seen a speedo read a few mph low? I've tested most of my recent cars with GPS and the speedo reads around 2 mph faster.
Eeek - you're right. I meant to say high! Must be fully awake next time I post.

Andy M

3,755 posts

280 months

Friday 1st February 2019
quotequote all
JMBMWM5 said:
I have one of these, it works well.
https://cheetahgps.co.uk/product/cheetah-c550-blac...
Is Waze not a better option (and free)?

Max Maxasson

440 posts

204 months

Friday 1st February 2019
quotequote all
Andy M said:
Is Waze not a better option (and free)?
I've running waze alongside cameralert and Waze is not nearly as reliable for speed camera positions...but once fully ported onto google maps it might get better with time.
The cameralert database goes back over 15 years from when tomtom nav software became available for pocket PCs and users of pocketgpsworld started collecting camera locations as POIs and adding them to the Nav software. Nowadays you get a database update most days. But you have to have a subscription...not something everyone is prepared to pay.

JMBMWM5

2,383 posts

219 months

Friday 1st February 2019
quotequote all
Andy M said:
Is Waze not a better option (and free)?
I have Dash Cam and the 550, not wanting the Mobile phone on show all time, this 550 gets free unlimited updates and so far accurate.

mikeN54

607 posts

202 months

Monday 4th February 2019
quotequote all
Yup all Speedos over read. It's the law. That way if you get caught doing 35 your car prob said 38 or something so no excuse! And BMWs are renowned for larger errors. My 06 330i used to read 100 at a "real" 92. Difference between ban and points.

As well as the "fixed" error programmed in to the reading, your Speedo error is tyre tread depth / pressure dependant as the speedo is transmission / wheel speed driven (electronically these days)

Over read error gets larger the more your tyres are worn (or tyres underinflated too, more so)

Worn or low pressure tyre or heavily loaded car (eg 5mm tread difference or 10mm diameter difference (on an 18" low profile) might give say 2 to 3% extra error. (2 or 3mph at 100mph) depending on tyre diameter. That's how ABS based TPMS systems work, as a tyre presssure goes down the wheel speed increases, it will detect even 2 or 3 psi low easily.

Not massive but if you're riding the error at cameras it all counts. Cameras measure real speed not what your Speedo said!

This creates the interesting problem that your odometer (which ignores factory set speedo error) will also over record mileage with worn or low pressure tyres!


Edited by mikeN54 on Monday 4th February 20:13

macushla

1,135 posts

87 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
I’d love someone to do the maths on this claim about the impact that worn tyres have on speed / mileage readings. I just can’t see that a couple of millimetres on a tyre wheel combo of whatever figure is that significant

Max Maxasson

440 posts

204 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
Between a new tyre and a bald one the difference in diameter is ~1% for my car.
So at 100 mph the difference in speed would be ~1 mph.
The smaller the diameter tyre the greater the difference though.

macushla

1,135 posts

87 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
Thanks. So pretty much dispels that myth, especially as we’re in the M Power section, so unlikely to be running round on 15 inch wheels.

AW10

4,610 posts

270 months

Monday 11th February 2019
quotequote all
Just did the maths on a 225/50 18 tyre. 8mm of tread worn away results in a diameter change of 16mm or 2.3%

macushla

1,135 posts

87 months

Monday 11th February 2019
quotequote all
AW10 said:
Just did the maths on a 225/50 18 tyre. 8mm of tread worn away results in a diameter change of 16mm or 2.3%
Do you fancy showing your workings. I’m intrigued.

Max Maxasson

440 posts

204 months

Monday 11th February 2019
quotequote all
I've reworked my figures on paper rather than in my head.
So for a 680mm diameter michelin tyre with ~7.6 mm total tread depth.
At legal minimum with 1.6mm tread the diameter is then 668mm.
Thats a % decrease in size from 680 to 668 of 1.765%
At 70 mph thats a difference of 1.25mph.
If the speedo takes its reading from the speed of the rear wheel then as the rear tyres reduce in circumference they have to make more revolutions to cover the same distance therefore the tendency for a speedo to over read increases. ie if the speedo was correct with new tyres on my car at 70mph it would show 71.25mph with tyres at the legal minimum.

RichardM5

1,812 posts

157 months

Monday 11th February 2019
quotequote all
225 50 R18 tyre when new is 682mm in diameter. The wheel is 457mm in diameter, the sidewall 112.5mm.

Wear of 8mm of tread will reduce the diameter by 16mm. 16 is 2.35% of 682 ((16/682)*100).

macushla

1,135 posts

87 months

Monday 11th February 2019
quotequote all
Guessing the difference is one of you is using the tread reduction twice at each side of the diameter.

Even going with the biggest figure it’s a negligible difference in speed reading.

AW10

4,610 posts

270 months

Monday 11th February 2019
quotequote all
The most recent figures of 1.765% and 2.35% both use twice the treadwear amount to calculate the difference in diameter; using the treadwear amount just once is wrong. The two figure differ because of different treadwear amounts (6mm versus 8mm).

The rolling diameter also expands slightly with speed. And as an aside I seem to recall that aircraft tyres can grow up to 5 percent in diameter after 50 heat cycles; wonder if the same happens to automobile tyres?