RE: McLaren renews engine contract with Ricardo

RE: McLaren renews engine contract with Ricardo

Tuesday 12th February

McLaren renews engine contract with Ricardo

UK engineering firm will continue to supply McLaren as it moves into its most ambitious phase yet



If you've been wondering who McLaren Automotive will task with building its engines as it embarks on its most ambitious period yet, we now have an answer: Ricardo. Yes, that's the same engine builder that the Woking firm has worked with since it launched back in 2011, meaning it's business as usual the manufacturer aims to electrify all of its core line-up.

But while Ricardo's involvement will continue to centre around the production of McLaren's oily bits, it could actually play a growing role in the electrification part, as hinted at in the firm's announcement. The Shoreham company said it is investing "in the production facility to accommodate additional product flexibility, new manufacturing capabilities, and further capacity", suggesting that engines might leave its site already mated to electric paraphernalia in the future.


That being said, McLaren's existing 4.0-litre petrol V8 is expected to remain the most ubiquitous ingredient in the line-up for some time. It was only introduced with the 720S in 2017, after all, and it provides the main source of propulsion to the 1,050hp hybrid Speedtail.

The new contract with Ricardo comes as part of McLaren's £1.2 billion Track25 plan, which laid out a schedule for 18 new cars to arrive by 2025. All of the brand's new core models will be electrified by the close of this proposal, with one possibly forgoing combustion power entirely as an all-electric hypercar.


CEO Mike Flewitt highlighted the importance of continuity during this period, explaining that "Ricardo shares McLaren's passion for exceptional performance, product innovation and quality". He said the company "has also become a trustworthy and reliable partner to McLaren in engine manufacture".

That, no doubt, is of utmost importance as McLaren readies itself for a fast-changing automotive landscape. So while we're not sure what form the line-up will take in the latter parts of the next decade, it's reassuring to know Ricardo's engine-building expertise will ensure McLarens retain the explosive, racing car-esque performance we've come to love for the next few years at least.

Author
Discussion

redroadster

Original Poster:

838 posts

170 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
Hope they start sounding better awsome noise needed adds character.

keirik

1,087 posts

81 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
Wonder if they're still using the engine bay software I wrote back in the mid 90s? Hope not!

GregorFuk

492 posts

138 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
And Graziano Trasmissioni? LOL

GranCab

1,319 posts

84 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
McLaren still can't match Ferrari's engineering prowess.

ghost83

2,711 posts

128 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
Can’t jnderstand why they don’t use Ricardo for their F1 engines
Advertisement

daveco

3,661 posts

145 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
GranCab said:
McLaren still can't match Ferrari's engineering prowess.
And with Cosworth building a NA V12 with 1,000 hp weighing a mere 206kg for Aston Martin, could McLaren be shooting themselves in the foot long term by being a bit objective about building cars?

I know the business plan has worked immensely well so far but surely at some point residuals/long term profitability will take a hit if their entire range has very similar powerplants in various states of tune.

GranCab

1,319 posts

84 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
The residuals on "mainstream" McLarens is already pretty poor.....

Munter

28,262 posts

179 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
daveco said:
And with Cosworth building a NA V12 with 1,000 hp weighing a mere 206kg for Aston Martin, could McLaren be shooting themselves in the foot long term by being a bit objective about building cars?

I know the business plan has worked immensely well so far but surely at some point residuals/long term profitability will take a hit if their entire range has very similar powerplants in various states of tune.
Given it's very close to having an electric motor, I don't think future buyers are going to care about the similarity in powerplants across models. It's going to be all about the real world numbers. 0-60, 0-100, BHP/KW, 'ring lap time. How that's done? So long as it's considered stylish, I think will be less and less important.

GranCab

1,319 posts

84 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
The engine is the heart and soul of any desirable car.

LordLoveLength

624 posts

68 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
GregorFuk said:
And Graziano Trasmissioni? LOL
Never knew that - Hoovie of Hoovies Garage fame on YouTube, has just bought an early one. On it's 3rd gearbox now, and 2nd engine...

Munter

28,262 posts

179 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
GranCab said:
The engine is the heart and soul of any desirable car.
I think Tesla have disproved that.

GranCab

1,319 posts

84 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
Exhibit #1 Cars



Exhibit #2 Transport


GranCab

1,319 posts

84 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
Munter said:
GranCab said:
The engine is the heart and soul of any desirable car.
I have corrected that for you smile

I think Tesla have disproved that.

RobM77

31,870 posts

172 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
ghost83 said:
Can’t jnderstand why they don’t use Ricardo for their F1 engines
I can understand it - Ricardo don't build F1 engines wink They've made loads of components, but designing and engineering a complete engine is a very different thing indeed that needs a huge amount of investment and expertise.

Munter

28,262 posts

179 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
GranCab said:
Munter said:
GranCab said:
The engine is the heart and soul of any desirable car.
I have corrected that for you smile

I think Tesla have disproved that.
Like it or not.

You're ability to use PH quoting is poor. hehe

But seriously. Tesla have a very desirable range of cars. People want them. Most can't afford them. But they want them. Because they are stylish and the numbers (particularly in ludicrous mode) are daft. Your modern buyer doesn't care so much about how the numbers are made. Certainly future buyers don't if we're talking residual values.

downhillmalins

122 posts

84 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
They do need to start making them sound better, its a big part of the supercar theatre. Definitely lacking from the current crop of Macs


GranCab

1,319 posts

84 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
Yes ... very desirable ... smile

howardhughes

273 posts

142 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
GranCab said:
McLaren still can't match Ferrari's engineering prowess.
And Ferrari still can't match McLarens stunning lines.

Touché shall we say?

Phil Dicky

5,474 posts

201 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
howardhughes said:
GranCab said:
McLaren still can't match Ferrari's engineering prowess.
And Ferrari still can't match McLarens stunning lines.

Touché shall we say?
Ferrari have had a touch more practice smile

The Li-ion King

257 posts

2 months

Tuesday 12th February
quotequote all
GranCab said:
Yes ... very desirable ... smile
New Range Extender? biggrin