RE: Mitsubishi Carisma | Shed of the Week

RE: Mitsubishi Carisma | Shed of the Week

Friday 13th March 2020

Mitsubishi Carisma | Shed of the Week

Become jaded by the top-drawer sheds of recent weeks? This ought to set you straight!



Shed has come up with a whizz-bang plan for de-stressing life on the road. The first part of it requires manufacturers to name their models more accurately, in order to express the sort of car that they are, or the market at which they are aimed. Motorists, for their part, would then be required by law to drive the cars whose names best reflected their personalities or the type of motoring that they intended to do.

The Honda Retirement. The BMW Superiority Complex. The Volvo Sundaytip. The Lotus Spin. The Kia Apology. The Skoda Simper. The Audi Arse. The Mercedes-Benz Indifference, with three specification levels - Mild, Lofty, and Supreme. You get the idea.

This plan would permit road users to predict, with some degree of accuracy, the likely reaction to any dodgy moves they might wish to execute. How much more relaxing would it be to know that the bold-verging-on-dangerous overtake you're mentally toying with is unlikely to be met by anything more aggressive than a limp wave and a wan smile, based on the Nissan Narcosis or Mazda Nice in front? On the other side, who in their right mind would barge their way past anyone driving an Isuzu Psychopath or a Range Rover Schoolrun?


Just think of it. No more missed carve-up opportunities on that two-lanes-going-down-to-one stretch of dual carriageway. No more Glasgow kisses by the last space in the supermarket car park. You'd know exactly who to take on and who to leave well alone just by looking at the boot badge. Honesty would be a key aspect of this brave new naming protocol, of course. The shady practice of grafting exciting names onto boring cars would be forbidden by law.

Which brings us to the Mitsubishi Carisma. A pal of Shed's had one of these. From getting in it to getting out, Shed's single abiding memory was the cheapskate gap between the seat base and seat back, which forced rear-seat passengers to view an oddly compressed, hairy and, thanks to car's terrible handling, usually sweaty section of his mate's buttocks.

There is nothing good to be said about the Carisma you are currently wincing at. Last year's MOT tester certainly found quite a bit of bad to say, though, mainly around its rotting rear end and failing suspension. Even sound Carismas are to be avoided like the plague that we are all trying to dodge at the moment, if you have even the vaguest interest in motoring pleasure.

This particular car will be even worse than Shed's pal's, which did at least have the decency to be powered by a petrol engine. This one is a diesel. Add in the near full-length scraping of the nearside bodywork (I'm having a crash, er, oh well, I've started now so I might as well finish) and the only thing detracting from its strong claim to be the worst car ever is the highly unusual 'yes please!' ticking of the leather upholstery option box. You can just imagine the strained look on the fleet manager's face as he grudgingly approved that one.


Even the trade vendor has given up on the impossible prospect of doing this car justice, choosing instead to enter this single enigmatic phrase in the description: 'Reference 10478260'. Crueller types than Shed will recognise this as the number of reasons why you shouldn't buy this car.

Why are we featuring it in Shed of the Week then, you cry? Partly to satisfy one or two readers who have been complaining about the constant stream of nice motors that people will insist on advertising in the PH Classifieds. A munter every now and again helps to bring a little perspective.

Shed wishes to assure his readers that he remains on a constant lookout for another Rover Chairman but until such time as that comes around he hopes that this amusingly priced Matsubashy - MOT due next month, good luck with that - will fulfil the expectations of those who believe that a shed really should be a shed.


See the full ad here

Author
Discussion

cerb4.5lee

Original Poster:

30,491 posts

180 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
No words! yikes

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
Well you lot complained last week "ooooh not another BMW". "This BMW is so boring in SE spec".

Well done PH - rip into the fools. smile

bitofayank

95 posts

69 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
Ooo what a hateful crap set of (15 inch) wheels. I see the lost Japanese art of ripping off something decent looking in that rear 2/3rd view: 2000s Volvo S60

thunderace887

13 posts

204 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
Wow an Evo IV-VI for £675!!!!!!!!

famfarrow

679 posts

154 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
SidewaysSi said:
Well you lot complained last week "ooooh not another BMW". "This BMW is so boring in SE spec".

Well done PH - rip into the fools. smile
Agreed excellent riposte PH!


humphra

481 posts

92 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
Lol, love the article. Thank you for starting my Friday with a smile!

Butter Face

30,283 posts

160 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
My parents bought one brand new in 2002 and it lasted until 2012. It was actually a pretty solid car and drove well enough, needed minimal work for the decade they ran it for. I was quite sad to see it go.

My grandad bought 2 of them, a Y plate one and then a 53 plate one, both good cars too.

alorotom

11,937 posts

187 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
Always thought the side profile of these had a whiff of mk1 Mondeo about them

It’s certainly has a scarcity value - can’t remember the last time I saw one of these on a road!

And the seat gap ... that ass-tastic breathability for when driving to the your MOT station and the “annual MOT sweats” break

GibsonSG

276 posts

111 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
Back in the day I had a Citroën Xantia (the 2.0 16v - oooh) as my first company car and I thought it was the dogs danglies.

Wasn't I disappointed to be ripped a new one by one of my team's Charisma's - a 1.8 GDI - repeatedly in a straight line drag. It must have been significantly lighter or lower geared than the Xantia as it definitely had the measure of it from 30 - 90!

Gary C

12,411 posts

179 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
Was this the car that they sold new in the uk then gave you a brand new one 6 months later ?


Butter Face

30,283 posts

160 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
GibsonSG said:
Back in the day I had a Citroën Xantia (the 2.0 16v - oooh) as my first company car and I thought it was the dogs danglies.

Wasn't I disappointed to be ripped a new one by one of my team's Charisma's - a 1.8 GDI - repeatedly in a straight line drag. It must have been significantly lighter or lower geared than the Xantia as it definitely had the measure of it from 30 - 90!
125ps out of those GDI engines. Proper rippers! hehe

only1ian

688 posts

194 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
This is the auto equivalent of someone who describes themselves as a “fun guy”

Evilex

512 posts

104 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
About that GDi lump..

If I'm correctly informed, it won't run on the incoming E10 petrol formulation. It'll be ok on E5. Assuming that it's not phased out too soon.


aston addict

421 posts

158 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
I’m assuming the vendor will pay you to take it away....?

ducnick

1,779 posts

243 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
This is more like it. Proper shedding.
I suspect if you went to the vendor with cash and the promise to remove it from their lot same day you could have a usable car for a year for £50.

yme402

383 posts

102 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
Maybe we should ask for a mid-week shed article ...........turd of the week?

ballans

790 posts

105 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
Haha, that’ll teach me to ask for something controversial.
Well played PH, excellent start to the day.

hogfisch

291 posts

191 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
Urgh. I feel violated just looking at that car.

Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
thunderace887 said:
Wow an Evo IV-VI for £675!!!!!!!!
My first thought was Richard Burns drove what was named a Carisma GT not the Lancer EVO in the WRC - I can remember if it looked any different though or if it was only a name change.


mrpenks

368 posts

155 months

Friday 13th March 2020
quotequote all
That’s a horrible car. And a brilliant article. Top marks!