RE: VW defeat devices broke law, UK courts decide
RE: VW defeat devices broke law, UK courts decide
Monday 6th April 2020

VW defeat devices broke law, UK courts decide

It's been a long time coming, but Dieselgate claimants have won their first battle



Remember Dieselgate? More than four years since news of Volkswagen's emissions scandal first broke, English courts have determined that the 90,000 UK customers seeking compensation were right to declare foul play. VW's use of "cheat devices", the courts have determined, did indeed break EU law, leading to what's expected to become the largest pay-out demand in English legal history. That's significant, because unlike in the US, it wasn't entirely clear whether VW had actually broken a law in Europe.

Determining that is has, however, doesn't necessarily mean that VW will have to pay any compensation. At this stage it's not clear whether the "defeat device" will be deemed to have caused any customers loss - a point that a spokesperson for the manufacturer made vigorously to the Guardian: "Volkswagen remains confident in our case that we are not liable to the claimants as alleged and the claimants did not suffer any loss. We will continue to defend our position robustly. Nothing in this decision today changes this."

Nevertheless, verdicts reached elsewhere have required the firm to reach deep into its pockets. The total sum up to this point is £26 billion, almost a tenth of which was for the US's criminal fine and associated legal fees.

Overseeing the UK case was the (brilliantly named) Justice Waksman, who ruled via a video feed that VW's "software function in issue in this case is indeed a defeat device" under EU regulations. He noted how many "other jurisdictions" have already shown to "agree that the software function here is a defeat device", leading to 40 times the claimed output of nitrogen oxide in certain diesel cars.

The fallout since has, of course, been enormous with VW's motorsport efforts subsequently culled and a newfound focus on electric power taking its place. Regardless, the car maker has remained enormously popular in Britain, at least as far as car sales are concerned, selling record numbers of vehicles before the recent market downturn. So unaffected was its status in this country, the Golf was vying with the Ford Fiesta for the biggest UK sales volume before coronavirus caused the market to contract by more than 40 per cent in March.

Author
Discussion

re33

Original Poster:

315 posts

181 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
Considering the VAG car owners benefitted from improved fuel economy/ lower use of adblue it's hard to see how they missed out. Compensation should be paid to suffers of respiratory problems really!

mikebradford

2,946 posts

162 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
Will be intresting to see the outcome of this as we have a golf that falls into the category so if compensation is payable I will hopefully make a claim.

blue al

1,197 posts

176 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
So before I say too much
It’s ok for VW to have already compensated other parts of the world by 20 + billion
But the UK customers should just suck it up...?

I don’t own a VW just a fan of karma and natural justice.

BBC take on this...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52184229

Edited by blue al on Monday 6th April 19:16

NelsonM3

1,775 posts

188 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
blue al said:
So before I say too much
It’s ok for VW to have already compensated other parts of the world by 20 + billion
But the UK customers should just suck it up...?

I don’t own a VW just a fan of karma and natural justice.
Nox emissions are not measured in the UK.

NDNDNDND

2,457 posts

200 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
re33 said:
Considering the VAG car owners benefitted from improved fuel economy/ lower use of adblue it's hard to see how they missed out. Compensation should be paid to suffers of respiratory problems really!
This is my take on it too - VW owners should be grateful to Volkswagen for side-stepping the regulations and allowing them to run cars that are more powerful, fuel efficient and cheaper to maintain.

They certainly haven't lost out financially - I very much doubt resale values have been affected at all. People claiming against Volkswagen are just in it for the free money.

SydneyBridge

10,346 posts

175 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
Will the owners be paying back the difference in the lower road tax that may have resulted from this.?

A1VDY

3,575 posts

144 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
SydneyBridge said:
Will the owners be paying back the difference in the lower road tax that may have resulted from this.?
Of course not. Its only the greedy that will claim. The type that claim for whiplash where there is no whiplash...

WonkeyDonkey

2,491 posts

120 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
Where can I claim for the decrease in air quality because of the sheer number of VAG tdi's on the road?

Can I claim against owners that continued to use their vehicles even though they knew about its increased poisonous output?

pfnsht

2,505 posts

192 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
Well I have a diesel that falls into the camp, owned it since it was 6 months old. Did it's emissions figures and quoted fuel economy factor into the buying decision? Yeah it did somewhat, obviously being a diesel. Was I a little frustrated at the time at the lack of petrol powered cars in its class, because government legislated diesels as the saviour - yeah I was.

Am I satisfied that VAG floated the rules and gave me a better driving car (as others are making out above)? No not really, don't really care about how "better" it drives to be honest. It is what it is, I hadn't got an unfixed one to try out when I bought it because it was 2013 before any of this was known.

Has VAG done wrong? Yes. Have they compensated customers around the world? Yes. Do I want compensating? Well yeah a precedent has already been set. You'd be mad to turn it down on principles at this stage.


la grange

45 posts

164 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
Yes , to some this may be a storm in a tea cup. But to others this is a morale maze. Is it alright for a corporation valued in excess of half a trillion pounds to engineer cars to their benefit , to cow tow to certain countries to hide behind legal teams and above all , treat customers with contempt ?

NDNDNDND

2,457 posts

200 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
I honestly don't think Volkswagen held their customers in contempt - I think they held the regulations in contempt. That's probably why regulators have been so heavy-handed, as it was they Volkswagen were flouting so blatantly.

The customers trying to cash in are just selfish, hypocritical freeloaders.

jimmytheone

1,771 posts

235 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
la grange said:
Yes , to some this may be a storm in a tea cup. But to others this is a morale maze. Is it alright for a corporation valued in excess of half a trillion pounds to engineer cars to their benefit , to cow tow to certain countries to hide behind legal teams and above all , treat customers with contempt ?
no moral maze for me here - VW have tried to get away with breaking the rules *and* hiding it, and they should be punished. I'm not talking compo for owners as much as compo for anyone who breathes in their emissions.

Gov could do with a windfall too, would help support the NHS.

unsprung

6,033 posts

141 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
blue al said:
From the BBC article:

"A spokesperson for the German carmaker said: 'To be clear, today's decision does not determine liability or any issues of causation or loss for any of the causes of action claimed. These remain to be determined by the court as the case continues.'"

There is something absurd about the way this matter has proceeded in the UK.

Across the Pond, Volkswagen unilaterally issued waves of reparations and customer assistance -- prior to finding itself in court. Later, after losing in court, Volkswagen was required to pay penalties and to top up and confirm further payments, buy-backs, and make-goods to consumers.

And all of that was initiated and concluded some time ago. In fact, many of the errant vehicles have since been retrofitted with compliant systems, courtesy of Volkswagen, and sold once again on the US market -- along with generous warranties.

It looks almost as if something or other about tort law and/or consumer protections in the UK is not as far-reaching as it could be.


Plate spinner

18,079 posts

217 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
I'd rather UK Gov sued VW for lost of tax receipts due to inaccurate Co2 bandings. Lord knows they could do with the cash right now...

adf83

73 posts

68 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
Surely they also gained an unfair advantage over rival manufacturers who were engineering their cars to genuinely meet the emissions standards. The development costs for those manufacturers must have been significantly higher than VW’s?

anonymous-user

71 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
pfnsht said:
Well I have a diesel that falls into the camp, owned it since it was 6 months old. Did it's emissions figures and quoted fuel economy factor into the buying decision? Yeah it did somewhat, obviously being a diesel. Was I a little frustrated at the time at the lack of petrol powered cars in its class, because government legislated diesels as the saviour - yeah I was.

Am I satisfied that VAG floated the rules and gave me a better driving car (as others are making out above)? No not really, don't really care about how "better" it drives to be honest. It is what it is, I hadn't got an unfixed one to try out when I bought it because it was 2013 before any of this was known.

Has VAG done wrong? Yes. Have they compensated customers around the world? Yes. Do I want compensating? Well yeah a precedent has already been set. You'd be mad to turn it down on principles at this stage.
Out of interest, would you buy another VW or VAG product?

CDP

7,871 posts

271 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
re33 said:
Considering the VAG car owners benefitted from improved fuel economy/ lower use of adblue it's hard to see how they missed out. Compensation should be paid to suffers of respiratory problems really!
This.

Now PPI is over it's time for the legal scavengers to start chasing every asthmatic or person with cardiovascular disease in the country....

Jimmy Recard

17,547 posts

196 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
adf83 said:
Surely they also gained an unfair advantage over rival manufacturers who were engineering their cars to genuinely meet the emissions standards. The development costs for those manufacturers must have been significantly higher than VW’s?
Yeah, that’s the part that annoys me. If others are following the rules, their products are more likely to be less competitive (power and fuel economy, for example) and possibly more expensive to produce.

The real losers here are the rivals that were honest and were put at a disadvantage by that

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

251 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
NDNDNDND said:
re33 said:
Considering the VAG car owners benefitted from improved fuel economy/ lower use of adblue it's hard to see how they missed out. Compensation should be paid to suffers of respiratory problems really!
This is my take on it too - VW owners should be grateful to Volkswagen for side-stepping the regulations and allowing them to run cars that are more powerful, fuel efficient and cheaper to maintain.

They certainly haven't lost out financially - I very much doubt resale values have been affected at all. People claiming against Volkswagen are just in it for the free money.
Exactly, no one should get a penny.

People who don't own a VW should be compensated.

What a load of BS. fking vultures.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

251 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
pfnsht said:
Well I have a diesel that falls into the camp, owned it since it was 6 months old. Did it's emissions figures and quoted fuel economy factor into the buying decision? Yeah it did somewhat, obviously being a diesel. Was I a little frustrated at the time at the lack of petrol powered cars in its class, because government legislated diesels as the saviour - yeah I was.

Am I satisfied that VAG floated the rules and gave me a better driving car (as others are making out above)? No not really, don't really care about how "better" it drives to be honest. It is what it is, I hadn't got an unfixed one to try out when I bought it because it was 2013 before any of this was known.

Has VAG done wrong? Yes. Have they compensated customers around the world? Yes. Do I want compensating? Well yeah a precedent has already been set. You'd be mad to turn it down on principles at this stage.
What hurt/damage has been done to you?

Think you need to get practising that "Compensation face". A few tears would add to the look.


Edited by SidewaysSi on Monday 6th April 23:20