RE: Honda S2000 | The Brave Pill
RE: Honda S2000 | The Brave Pill
Saturday 19th September 2020

Honda S2000 | The Brave Pill

Is the cheapest, leggiest S2000 in the classifieds courageous enough to be a true Pill?



Given it was clearly impossible to top last week's £3995 Mercedes S600 - the bravest-ever Brave Pill - we've opted to turn the dial down by several notches this week and bring you something completely different: a Honda S2000. So like going from the mosh pit of a death metal concert to the back row at a chamber music recital. Yet while no Honda can be considered brave in absolute terms, this one is braver than the rest.

Only a modest amount of hazard comes from the car's mechanical components, with the S2000's rev-delirious engine as close to being bombproof as anything capable of 9,000rpm could ever be. More peril comes from the roadster's documented tendency to rust, an affliction our Pill seems to have suffered from in the past. But the greatest jeopardy for any early S2000 comes from handling that can catch out the unwary and even the moderately wary alike.

Honda was a very different brand in the nineties, a time before the average age of its buyers started to climb towards the same decade. It was clever and engineering-led, a company which took pride in cool technical solutions and exciting products. To celebrate its 50th anniversary in 1999 Honda decided to push the boat out with two new models - the worthy, future-looking Insight hybrid, and the more traditional, but more thrilling, S2000.


Honda had been dropping roadster hints for several years prior to confirming production, and the S2000 basics were hugely promising. This was to be an all-thrills, no-frills roadster that would use the world's most advanced four-cylinder engine, a 2.0-litre naturally aspirated unit that, thanks to the miracle of Honda's VTEC variable timing and the company's mastery of tolerances would make a dizzying 240hp at 8,600rpm, meeting its limiter 400rpm later. Even by the standards of a much revvier era those figures still seemed impossible, and meant the Honda would have a higher specific output than any contemporary supercar. Dual wishbone suspension, a clever reinforced structure and an early implementation of electric power steering were other highlights.

When journos got to experience the S2000 in 1999 we discovered that the screaming engine was every bit as special as we hoped it would be. Although the peak 150lb-ft of torque was delivered at 7,500rpm, the motor was reasonably tractable lower down, and the ultra-slick action of the six-speed manual transmission made changing gears a tactile pleasure. But revs always made it better, especially beyond the 5850rpm where the VTEC shifted the cams to their more aggressive profile, bringing a harder engine note and a head-nodding bump of acceleration. Even under the hardest use it felt unburstable.

The S2000's engine was great, its chassis was less so. Expectations that the Honda would share the accessible manners of Japan's other native rear-drive roadster were soon dashed. The Mazda MX-5 had always seemed happiest when exploring the slidey hinterland between traction and oversteer, but the brawnier S2000 was all about grip. Without traction control it was entirely possible to overwhelm the adhesion of the Honda's Bridgestone Potenzas, but the transition to sliding was snappy and hard to catch.


It was a point made at the 2004 Autocar Sideways Challenge, when the S2000 was chosen as the means of separating the front runners who had proved themselves in their own cars. Few managed it; even the handiest hands could manage less drifting than spinning in the hair trigger Honda. At road speeds the snappy manners were less of an issue, but in the wet an early S2000 still needed to be treated with proper respect, with a fair number wrapped around trees and road furniture when 'exciting' turned to 'exiting backwards.'

Suspension tweaks and geometry changes tamed the S2000's limit handling over time, although they never turned it friendly. The biggest revisions were made at the same time the car got a modest visual makeover in 2004. Many owners have also given their cars a variety of mechanical updates over the years thanks to an active tuner culture, some of which have been accompanied by some very Fast & Furious styling tweaks.

Not so our Pill, which appears to be an unmolested pre-facelift car, although late enough to have gained the worthwhile addition of a glass rear screen in place of the original car's plastic hood window. It is also being sold with the desirable option of a hardtop. It looks like conspicuously good value, a £6,995 asking meaning it's nearly half the price of the next cheapest S2000 currently in the classifieds. While S2000 values have been steadily rising over the last few years our Pill's 158,000-mile odometer means it's always likely to be fishing in a smaller and more courageous pond when it comes to potential buyers.


A look at the MOT history shows that most of those miles were acquired early on - it has averaged just 2,000 a year since 2013 - but also prove constant use and that attention has been paid to the various issues testers have turned up. Most of these have been too minor to scare the sort of fire-breathers who consider Pill purchase. But given the S2000's well documented tendency for underbody corrosion there are a couple of pink flags in the record. In 2014 the car failed on excessive rust near the near-side seatbelt anchorage and the following year the examined noted "corrosion setting in throughout the vehicle." Things have got less scary since then, although grot in both the rear sub frame and nearside sill has triggered advisories.

Other things can still go wrong, of course. The S2000's zingy engine is meant to get regular maintenance - the oil is meant to be changed at six month/6,000 mile intervals - and our Pill's advert lacks any claims about service history. Brake calipers are prone to seizure and the geometry bolts that allow the suspension to be adjusted often rust solid and need to be persuaded out with heat, violence or both. Not a very scary list of risks, admittedly - especially not compared to those associated with last week's V12 Mercedes. But while the risk is small the potential reward of a low-cost S2000 is still considerable.


See the full advert here



Author
Discussion

veevee

Original Poster:

1,458 posts

173 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
Hard to believe it's 7k for the cheapest one of these now. Only about 3/4 years ago I went to look at the cheapest one on autotrader - £3500 and less miley. The rear arches were significantly worse than the photos and 'minor rust' in the description. Didn't buy it.

Edited by veevee on Saturday 19th September 05:18

Glenn63

3,728 posts

106 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
I’d say it looks rather well for such mileage especially the interior leathers, seats etc.

shantybeater

1,199 posts

191 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
Rust really kills these cars, I spent over a year restoring the arches/underside of mine for peace of mind.

Cheaper cars are out there, but anything with visible rust on the arches/sills would be enough to put me off

anonymous-user

76 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
I've never really liked these, although occasionally look at them each time they just dont do it for me. My mate had one and completely smashed it up, ended up in hospital. The early ones are twitchy little bds improved later on and seemingly holding their value...so I suppose this one is decent value.

anonymous-user

76 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
ash73 said:
Didn't know these had a rust problem.
Other than Volvos I think any 16 year old steel bodied car is likely to have rust issues.

The Rotrex Kid

33,904 posts

182 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
stickleback123 said:
ash73 said:
Didn't know these had a rust problem.
Other than Volvos I think any 16 year old steel bodied car is likely to have rust issues.
Strangely there doesn’t seem to be any rhyme or reason in Hondas of this age when it comes to rust, my 2002 Civic is virtually rust free, I’ve seen S2k’s and EP3’s of the same age completely rotted out underneath and others with just light bubbling.

FWIW this seems like a (relative) bargain if you’re after an S2K. They’re only getting rarer and rarer.

Court_S

14,565 posts

199 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
I really like these, I think they’ve aged pretty well. Prices do seem to be going up.

They used to be a pretty common thing but I can’t recall the last time I saw one.

alorotom

12,677 posts

209 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
I was only looking at examples of these last night ... there's a few on AT and eBay for £4500 and £4995 ... one with very well rusted arches.

I regret not buying a new Nurburgring blue one of these years ago.

Sandpit Steve

13,776 posts

96 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
If prices are going up, they’re really not brave pills.

boozyjay

187 posts

88 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
My wife purchased one of the first UK cars, it was grey with red leather seats. Great memories of driving it up to and around the lake district for a week in summer weather with the roof down. It wasn't a great car if you wanted to just tootle round though as the engine was too highly strung. Great when you wanted to kick on though. She had to sell it after 18 months unfortunately as we had baby on the way.

Painter38

121 posts

119 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
boozyjay said:
My wife purchased one of the first UK cars, it was grey with red leather seats. Great memories of driving it up to and around the lake district for a week in summer weather with the roof down. It wasn't a great car if you wanted to just tootle round though as the engine was too highly strung. Great when you wanted to kick on though. She had to sell it after 18 months unfortunately as we had baby on the way.
Then what happened?

Pughmacher

433 posts

65 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
Do these really hold their value that well? I’m not knocking it. I wouldn’t know whether they are holding their value that well at all. If I guessed I’d have said 5k for a tidy one. The interior in this one appears to have worn well for the mileage (not a surprise from Honda admittedly). Rust is a universal fact of life for cars made with steel. It’ll happen. The “corrosion settling in” advisory made me chuckle! I wonder if the tin worm had its own blanket and slippers?

boozyjay

187 posts

88 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
Painter38 said:
boozyjay said:
My wife purchased one of the first UK cars, it was grey with red leather seats. Great memories of driving it up to and around the lake district for a week in summer weather with the roof down. It wasn't a great car if you wanted to just tootle round though as the engine was too highly strung. Great when you wanted to kick on though. She had to sell it after 18 months unfortunately as we had baby on the way.
Then what happened?
A Jeep Grand Cherokee! Albeit a V8.

GTiWILL

780 posts

100 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
I remember driving one whilst my EP3 was in for a service. I enjoyed it but it didn’t feel like it had another 40bhp on my car. In fact it felt flat in comparison!

rotaryjam

687 posts

123 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
Pughmacher said:
Do these really hold their value that well? I’m not knocking it. I wouldn’t know whether they are holding their value that well at all. If I guessed I’d have said 5k for a tidy one. The interior in this one appears to have worn well for the mileage (not a surprise from Honda admittedly). Rust is a universal fact of life for cars made with steel. It’ll happen. The “corrosion settling in” advisory made me chuckle! I wonder if the tin worm had its own blanket and slippers?
100%

The values of these have consistently risen over the past 5 years, as someone else mentioned you used to get one for £3-4k not that long ago and they've just gone up from there. With the recent covid price bump, you are now looking at about £9-10k for a half decent one with less than 90,000 miles.

Still quite a few around now but with the rust taking a lot of them I can see the prices of these being £20k plus for the equivalent of the above in a few years time.

I don't think now is a good time to buy though, I'd at least wait until January next year when the covid increase has hopefully lapsed and demand lowered with it being winter

As for this one, I've seen better for less so the only thing brave about this is over paying for it!

cib24

1,127 posts

175 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
These rust almost as bad as MX-5s so you really need to choose wisely. So many that have had waxoil plastered on underneath without removing or converting the rust first so you end up seeing the orange creep through the waxoil.

Water Fairy

6,414 posts

177 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
GTiWILL said:
I remember driving one whilst my EP3 was in for a service. I enjoyed it but it didn’t feel like it had another 40bhp on my car. In fact it felt flat in comparison!
Back in the day I remember chasing one in my then new EP3 and there didn't seem to be anything in it

psychoR1

1,105 posts

209 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
I had one of these for a while in RED - a very pretty car but sadly I didn't gel with it whilst I loved the looks.

My own experience was;
- they do rust - some quite badly - mine was average,
- they are very susceptible to alignment and usually the suspension bolts are seized so expect a bid bill unless you DIY,
- they can be twitchy - some owners have fitted racelogic traction control,
- the roof wears badly on the hips and a lot look tatty,
- the clutch release bearing is noisey on the AP1's,
- Honda timing chain tensioners of this era are made of 'chocolate' - so almost a service item,

I would also say that the engines are not bullet proof and there were engine failures in the run out models and few in the S2KOC reports of rods exiting the block.

As the values show, the market views them kindly, but for me the MX5 that preceded mine and without doubt the Mr2 turbo that followed it were both better cars.

Pillskii

130 posts

174 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
Had one of these for about a year (2009 model). Engine and gear change were phenomenal, with the Tenabe Medallion exhaust it sounded fantastic. However the ride was bone shaking hard and the interior rattled. Motorway driving was also tough due to both engine and wind noise.

Loved it but couldn’t live with it. Mine was starting to develop a few rust issues and I regularly had to clean out a puddle in the boot floor.


Water Fairy

6,414 posts

177 months

Saturday 19th September 2020
quotequote all
I don't think this is brave but am I the only one who thinks it is expensive?