RE: Mercedes SLK 55 AMG (R172) | Spotted

RE: Mercedes SLK 55 AMG (R172) | Spotted

Wednesday 30th September 2020

Mercedes SLK 55 AMG (R172) | Spotted

Just a few years from its demise, the last of the baby Benz bruisers is more alluring than ever



The sports car, having once been a status symbol without equal, is having a tough time of it at the moment. They simply aren't as fashionable as they once were, and the ripple effect can be seen everywhere. News of the Nissan Z Proto not coming to Europe is merely the latest in the long line of disappointments. Rumours abound that the Audi TT will be replaced with something four-door and electric, the Toyota GT86/Subaru BRZ duo have undersold (though are being replaced), the Alpine hasn't flown off forecourts and there isn't going to be another Mercedes SLC.

Now, granted, there were probably not droves of people mourning the demise of Mercedes' smallest drop-top. It frequently lost out in comparisons to its German rivals and never quite captured the style of the original in subsequent updates. Nevertheless its departure only reduces variety in the Mercedes range; it might seem like there's a new model introduced every other day, but there aren't many which aren't SUVs, saloons or A-Classes. At least the SLK/SLC brightened up the showrooms a bit.

It also implied a bit of imagination and ambition; none more than the SLK 55 AMG. Because here was a car typically offered with 2.0-litre, four-cylinder petrols and diesels, suddenly equipped with a 5.5-litre V8. Not only that, but a V8 larger than the previous time AMG had convinced Mercedes-Benz the idea was a reasoned one. The car before this one, the R171 SLK55 AMG, used the 5,439cc M113 V8, enough for 360hp in the standard car or 400hp in the Black Series.


For the R172 '55, AMG employed an even larger (5,461cc), even more powerful (421hp), M152 V8, essentially the same engine found in the contemporary '63 models but shorn of its twin-turbos. It was a mighty engine, bestowing upon the innocent SLK a wild, muscle-car edge, and the experience chiefly became about the car's attempts to contain it. The claimed 33.6mpg surely says more about the NEDC test than any great parsimony on the V8's part.

Of course the engine made the SLK memorable, and that attribute is becoming ever more desirable in cars - especially when nice '55s like this one are available for £25k. A 2013 car, it's notable for having the AMG Performance Package (meaning a limited-slip diff) and speed limiter raise that it's hard to imagine many customers taking up. The paint scheme won't be to all tastes, though again it ensures that this is not simply another blend-in SLK.

Of course at this point it's probably worth pointing out that a Boxster will be a sharper steer for similar money, the V6 SLC43 that followed will be just as quick and the early Jaguar F-Types are only getting cheaper. But even with that knowledge, it's easy to see the charm of a V8 SLK. Specifically because it's a V8 SLK. Imperfect, yet endearing. And sometimes that's enough.


SPECIFICATION | MERCEDES SLK55 AMG

Engine: 5,461cc, V8
Transmission: 7-speed AMG Speedshift Plus automatic, rear-wheel drive, limited-slip diff
Power (hp): 422@6,800rpm
Torque (lb ft): 398@4,500rpm
MPG: 33.6 (NEDC)
CO2: 195g/km (NEDC)
First registered: 2013
Recorded mileage: 39,000
Price new: £54,965 (before options)
Yours for: £24,995

See the original advert here




Author
Discussion

Davismatt

Original Poster:

113 posts

175 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
I would. In fact I just might.

ocrx8

873 posts

209 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Always really wanted one of these, can’t beat a big-engined small roadster. It’s a shame they don’t sound quite as good as the R171, even with a x-pipe, but it’s certainly on my list of future cars to own.

Commander2874

377 posts

98 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Great cars indeed, sad state of affairs for us re the future

cerb4.5lee

36,329 posts

193 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
What an engine and that is right up my street. smokin

I've always hankered after a manual version though, and I wished that Mercedes offered one in this for sure.


T1berious

2,480 posts

168 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Yes. Yes please.

Is this from an era where Mercs were relatively free of bork?

Its not all doom and gloom on the sports car front, Porsche have shoehorned the 4.0 flat 6 into the Boxster/ Cayman GTS. Proving for some cars, downsizing isn't the best option.

The 718 will no doubt go electric. But as the batteries get lighter and with better density I'm sure there will be some entertainment coming.


Augustus Windsock

3,594 posts

168 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
I knew a young lady that had been involved in a bad RTA, had been wearing a lap belt and the end result was she was paralysed from the waist down.
When I first met her she had the previous generation SLK55, which she drove with hand controls
It was replaced by an XKR and then an Aston V8 Vantage, all with hand controls
Apparantly she used to go on track days and embarrassed quite a few of the predominantly male able-bodied drivers
A friend of mine went with her a couple of times and said the way she drove the SLK was hilarious.
I remember her saying that the time it was her favourite car, big enough to get her wheelchair in but small enough to be fun on B roads, and fast enough to embarrass all manner of cars (and young guns in hot hatches)

redroadster

1,845 posts

245 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
This or a used f type Jag ? .

clarki

1,348 posts

232 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Nice to see an R172 getting a bit of notice on PHs.

Had mine since new (it's a 2015 model) and still get a buzz every time I drive it.

Treat it as a hotrod rather than a car to go chasing apexes and you get the point. It has quite a pointy front end which is nice and reassuring but the chassis is slow to respond which does hamper progress.

Masses of straight line ooomph, noticeably quicker than my misses' 981 S, and good brakes help.

It's better built, more comfortable and has more toys than the Porsche and has cost very little to run. Will admit the tiny (8K to date) mileage probably has something to do with that!! The cylinder deactivation does mean 33mpg+ on a steady run is easily achievable.

But it's all about the engine. Terrible gearbox compared with the modern stuff. It's all about the engine. The rev-matching downshift and pop and bang upshifts in S mode are addictive.

To me it seems like a car > the sum of its parts. Probably a keeper now tbh.

The noise as it barks into life in the garage never gets old.




fantheman80

1,887 posts

62 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
I preferred the look of the previous model, the one Clarkson pretended to escape the bullets with.

C.MW

487 posts

82 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Augustus Windsock said:
I knew a young lady that had been involved in a bad RTA, had been wearing a lap belt and the end result was she was paralysed from the waist down.
When I first met her she had the previous generation SLK55, which she drove with hand controls
It was replaced by an XKR and then an Aston V8 Vantage, all with hand controls
Apparantly she used to go on track days and embarrassed quite a few of the predominantly male able-bodied drivers
A friend of mine went with her a couple of times and said the way she drove the SLK was hilarious.
I remember her saying that the time it was her favourite car, big enough to get her wheelchair in but small enough to be fun on B roads, and fast enough to embarrass all manner of cars (and young guns in hot hatches)
What a fascinating story, really enjoyed reading that. Wish I knew a woman that cool interested in cars.

flukey5

406 posts

73 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
redroadster said:
This or a used f type Jag ? .
Without a doubt the f-type. You can even have a manual. Also, no laggy turbos. The f-type looks special, this looks like every other merc produced in the last ~15 years.

SweptVolume

1,122 posts

106 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
These are on my radar.

My concerns are the gearbox not being up to ZF standards (something this article didn't touch on). I know the old SLK55 had the very old 7 speed MB 'box that wasn't much snuff, but is this one significantly improved.

Also, sadly, these seem only to be available in white, silver, or black. Even a red one would be tasty, but so, so rare.

SweptVolume

1,122 posts

106 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
flukey5 said:
redroadster said:
This or a used f type Jag ? .
Without a doubt the f-type. You can even have a manual. Also, no laggy turbos. The f-type looks special, this looks like every other merc produced in the last ~15 years.
Yeah, but manual F Types are rare as hens' teeth and only available on the V6. Though it's probably fair to say the ZF slusher on the F Type is better than the MB one fitted to the SLK. Also, as the article points out, no turbos are fitted to this car. The last of the n/a AMG V8s, which makes it a bit special IMO.

irocfan

43,492 posts

203 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
redroadster said:
This or a used f type Jag ? .
That would be a conundrum - big fan of the SLK/C (had a 55 R171, a 250 R172 currently we have a final edition SLC200) lovely touring cars (and the 55 was just bonkers) BUT the F-type really appeals

SFO

5,170 posts

196 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
way too much weight over the front axle which results in an unruly rear axle especially as you traverse diagonal ridges

great engine, but horrible ride and handling


clarki

1,348 posts

232 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Maybe shouldn't have said the gearbox is terrible. That's not true. It's works fine, it's not jerky or juddery. It's just compared with the modern stuff, pdk etc, it's slow to respond when your pushing on. Changing modes doesn't seem to make any difference either. The flexibility and sheer grunt of the engine does help though and you soon learn how to get the best out of it.


Taylor James

3,111 posts

74 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
flukey5 said:
redroadster said:
This or a used f type Jag ? .
Without a doubt the f-type. You can even have a manual. Also, no laggy turbos. The f-type looks special, this looks like every other merc produced in the last ~15 years.
I agree. At £20K maybe but with F-types falling no way would I buy this at £25K. I like the Merc and the concept but it does still look like my sister's old SLK200 at first glance.

soad

33,796 posts

189 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Davismatt said:
I would. In fact I just might.
It is tempting, hugely.

But, I have only got £20k spare at the moment... wink

DaveyBoyWonder

3,049 posts

187 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
I love these but can't get away from the fact that if you see one, you'll automatically assume its a 2.0 petrol driven by a woman in her 50s on her way to the salon.

ArmaghMan

2,600 posts

193 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Ditto my SL 55. Everyone thinks its just an SL 350. Its ever so slightly not!!