Berkeley Bandit
Author
Discussion

Miserablegit

Original Poster:

4,442 posts

139 months

Sunday 1st November 2020
quotequote all
Just stumbled across this on the BBC - can’t see any other posts.
Not a bad looking car but not sure how the economics work with it supposedly being built in such small numbers.


anonymous-user

84 months

Sunday 1st November 2020
quotequote all

SuperPav

1,343 posts

155 months

Sunday 1st November 2020
quotequote all
If they make it work with those numbers it'll be very cool. The design looks spot on, very relatable to the original cars, quirky proportions and all, but equally nicely sharp and modern. A modern "micro" car sports car is a novel proposition.

I'm not convinced the business model stacks up, but if they manage to get a few built and sold, they'll definitely be a unique product. Now if only BMW could buy out Microlino and refine a 2021 Isetta to sit alongside it, I'll take one of each smile

Jimmy Recard

17,550 posts

209 months

Sunday 1st November 2020
quotequote all
"A company that built sports cars in the 1950s..."

Is it really the same company or has someone bought the name and started a new venture?

ChevronB19

9,148 posts

193 months

Sunday 1st November 2020
quotequote all
Like it. Dad had several of the original Berkeley’s.

Miserablegit

Original Poster:

4,442 posts

139 months

Sunday 1st November 2020
quotequote all
I thought the original company had been dissolved a long time ago.
I think this is the company that changed its name at the beginning of October. Presumably they bought the rights whatever they might be.

Good luck to them - Looks interesting but the numbers are hard to work.
The roadster will have to compete with the MX5 at one end and the Boxster at the other. If it’s lightweight and genuinely fun then it might be one to watch - less concerned by what it is made of and more interested in weights and performance/handling


samoht

7,255 posts

176 months

Sunday 1st November 2020
quotequote all

If it's really going to be 700kg, it would seem more of an ultra-lightweight, Elise/Caterham type car, than an MX-5 - Boxster competitor. OTOH if it's a bit more civilised it could complete with the A110 at the £50k mark, both being mid-engined turbo fours.

I like the styling, seems a really refreshing break from the modern style of high beltlines and huge wheels, and eschewing the aero priority of a high tail. Very nice.

That said, the pair of tiny slits ahead of the rear wheels don't look to me to provide nearly enough airflow for a 400hp engine, between air inlet, intercooler, rad and general engine cooling.

Anyway, hope that it makes the jump from render to reality, would be great to see it come together and impress the magazines.

swisstoni

24,021 posts

309 months

Sunday 1st November 2020
quotequote all
Why not. Good luck to em.

A1VDY

3,575 posts

157 months

Sunday 1st November 2020
quotequote all
Jimmy Recard said:
"A company that built sports cars in the 1950s..."

Is it really the same company or has someone bought the name and started a new venture?
It's the latter. It's nothing to do with the original company.
Chancers trying to make a buck on a very long defunct name..

swisstoni

24,021 posts

309 months

Sunday 1st November 2020
quotequote all
A1VDY said:
Jimmy Recard said:
"A company that built sports cars in the 1950s..."

Is it really the same company or has someone bought the name and started a new venture?
It's the latter. It's nothing to do with the original company.
Chancers trying to make a buck on a very long defunct name..
Like Bugatti.

Skyedriver

23,419 posts

312 months

Monday 16th November 2020
quotequote all
The coupe reminds me of the Elva BMW of the 70's Beautiful little car.

dinkel

27,788 posts

288 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all

Please bring it on!


Or this...


Or this...

There are numerous fantastic lightweight designs and IMO the new A110 can use some competition. Trying one of these: tight fit!

LordGrover

34,173 posts

242 months

Tuesday 15th November 2022
quotequote all
Still nothing firm, but I don't think it's dead. Yet.