RE: Mazda 6 MPS­ | Spotted
RE: Mazda 6 MPS­ | Spotted
Monday 22nd February 2021

Mazda 6 MPS­ | Spotted

Fast saloons like the 260hp Mazda 6 MPS aren't really a thing anymore - pity



Perhaps nothing shows how quickly tastes can change in the automotive world than the demise of the sports saloon. Once upon a time it was the fast four-door that seemingly everyone aspired to, the halo atop a humdrum range drawing much needed attention to a franchise showroom usually brimmed with mediocrity.

A lot of manufacturers tried their hand at it, various VXR Vauxhalls, ST Fords, Saab Aeros, T5 Volvos and even Subaru Legacys attempting to lure customers away from the German alternatives with their take on practical performance. And then there was Mazda's interpretation: the 6 MPS.

It seemed the 6 occupied a clever a little niche on its launch in 2006. Because with its Japanese heritage and turbocharged four-cylinder engine, it might have suited those who had matured out of the rally replicas. Moreover, its four-wheel drive gave it traction and composure missing from what could be quite lairy front-wheel drive alternatives. Plus, of course, it was an awful lot cheaper than some of the German alternatives - £23,950 would not have bought 260 BMW horsepower 15 years ago.

The 6 was received pretty well, too, with both its clever all-wheel drive system (including a rear limited-slip diff) and performance coming in for praise. Quality was good, the 6 looked smart and it was well equipped - so what happened?


The market shifted, of course. Even by the time of its introduction, the writing was on the wall for the mainstream sports saloon. And despite Mazda flying high with cars like the RX-8 and MX-5, the badge didn't fit either. Not with the mainstream buying public's idea of what a four-door performance car should be. Moreover, there's no denying the additional practicality that's afforded by a hatchback bodystyle, either - or an SUV one...

Be that as it may, those still intrigued by the concept should find plenty to like about this particular 6 MPS - not least because it's for sale at just £5,495. It's covered 67,000 miles from new and has been serviced 10 times over that period, eight of those with a main dealer. It appears to scrub up okay inside and out, too - and with the all-wheel drive usability factored in, the MPS perhaps has more going for it now than ever before. You're not likely to see another every day, either.

Frustratingly, as a 2007 car and with a 245g/km CO2 rating, this 6 will cost more to tax, which could put some off what is an otherwise enticingly cheap car. As will a 27mpg average. But then they're only comparable with rivals of the time, so it's hardly like a contemporary BMW, Ford or Volvo would be significantly cheaper to run.

In fact, the 6's appeal is almost unchanged 15 years after launch: for under-the-radar performance that costs not a lot of money, you can't do much better. In a car world that now seems a lot more about show than go the MPS might be less popular than ever - but if anything that only serves to make it more likeable to the few. Don't forget that BBR can make it go a bit quicker, too...


SPECIFICATION | MAZDA 6 MPS

Engine: 2,261cc 4-cyl, turbocharged
Transmission: 6-speed manual, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 260@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 280@3,000rpm
MPG: 27.7 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 245g/km
First registered: 2007
Recorded mileage: 67,000
Price new: £23,950
Yours for: £5,495

See the original advert here





Author
Discussion

pb8g09

Original Poster:

2,934 posts

90 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
Am I right in thinking that these were in the top tax bracket?

Feels like a fair bit of money for running costs vs performance ratio but I assume the low mileage comes into play. Maybe I'm just a tightarse.




rampageturke

2,623 posts

183 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
Seen this for sale for quite a while now. still not shifted

cerb4.5lee

40,274 posts

201 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
I've always liked these. A nice and understated performance car I reckon.

soad

34,249 posts

197 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
pb8g09 said:
Am I right in thinking that these were in the top tax bracket?

Feels like a fair bit of money for running costs vs performance ratio but I assume the low mileage comes into play. Maybe I'm just a tightarse.



ajguk

332 posts

93 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
Cracking engine once the VVT issues have been sorted. I had a 3 MPS that I loved despite the aforementioned problems. Full whack tax though hurt a bit!

anonymous-user

75 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
Has more than a whiff of an Alfa 159 about it.

culpz

4,962 posts

133 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
I'd deffo have one of those. High tax wouldn't really bother me tbh. Didn't these have the potential to throw up big bills though? Usually, Mazda's don't generally have bork-factors associated with them, but i suspect these possibly might. Really good looking cars though and, funnily enough, a very similar recipe to today's fast saloons. Looks like a bit of steal for the cash!

Pegscratch

1,872 posts

129 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
Notoriously fragile with hideously high CO2 and associated tax implications. A splendid car let down by a couple of fairly significant barriers to ownership making it an unappetising ownership proposition.

VVT issues regardless, HPFP weakness before mapping, drivetrain issues after, awkwardly integrated infotainment and a bodystyle that never really worked the way it's replacement did.

blue_haddock

4,750 posts

88 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
This era of Mazda 6 also appear to rot quite a lot too

BrettMRC

5,347 posts

181 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
Not a mention of rust so far....?

Great cars, but only at shed money are they worth a punt these days.

cerb4.5lee

40,274 posts

201 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
soad said:
pb8g09 said:
Am I right in thinking that these were in the top tax bracket?

Feels like a fair bit of money for running costs vs performance ratio but I assume the low mileage comes into play. Maybe I'm just a tightarse.


That has made me feel slightly better about paying £580 for my 370Z. I always think that I could get a V8 for the same tax band. It does seem mad paying that money in VED for only a 4 cylinder engine, and I imagine that to put quite a few people off this.

Lincsls1

3,863 posts

161 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
I had one of these for a while, a very nice competent car. Didn't sound very nice IMO, certainly standard.
Looked much better on the RX8 wheels that I acquired too.
Didn't have any issues with it at all, although I felt rust might become an issue, certainly from looking underneath and my car was probably only 5/6 years old at the time.
Being a 56 plate, the tax also really naffed me off.

J4CKO

45,376 posts

221 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
Is it me or does everything seem way more expensive than it was ?

That was three grand car not long ago I would have thought, five and a half for a 14 year old Mazda that everyone has largely forgotten about ?


Pistonheader101

2,206 posts

128 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
3 MPS were better known i think

Pegscratch

1,872 posts

129 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
That was three grand car not long ago I would have thought, five and a half for a 14 year old Mazda that everyone has largely forgotten about ?
That's a five and a half grand car the day I was an attractive relationship proposition. 15 years and 70lbs later that Mazda is a £4k car on the best of days IMO.

matchmaker

8,930 posts

221 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
Pegscratch said:
Notoriously fragile with hideously high CO2 and associated tax implications. A splendid car let down by a couple of fairly significant barriers to ownership making it an unappetising ownership proposition.

VVT issues regardless, HPFP weakness before mapping, drivetrain issues after, awkwardly integrated infotainment and a bodystyle that never really worked the way it's replacement did.
My son nearly bought one. It was being driven down to deliver to him from the dealer when the engine threw a rod through the block. A lucky escape!

Pegscratch

1,872 posts

129 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
matchmaker said:
My son nearly bought one. It was being driven down to deliver to him from the dealer when the engine threw a rod through the block. A lucky escape!
Yep. For what it is it's an immensely torquey engine which the AWD system did precisely nothing to help. Where the 3MPS spun it's wheels so the engine had a bit of reprieve, the 6MPS gripped and spat rods. Usually banana-shaped.

njw1

2,617 posts

132 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
I like these, they've always reminded me of the Sapphire Cosworth, apparently the Ford 2.3 ecoboost engine was based on the engine in this too.

Wheel_Turned_Out

1,885 posts

59 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
If I were in the mood to be silly and throw way too much money at something performance-oriented, but suitable for the school run, from the period...I'd be far more tempted by this. £1500 more, admittedly, but as we're already north of £5k for the Mazda everything is relative.


ZX10R NIN

29,807 posts

146 months

Monday 22nd February 2021
quotequote all
Fast but fragile it was up against cars like the ST220 which was a better car.