RE: Austin Metro 1.3 HLE | Spotted
RE: Austin Metro 1.3 HLE | Spotted
Wednesday 13th December 2023

Austin Metro 1.3 HLE | Spotted

Now 40 years old (and therefore ULEZ exempt, too), a marvellous Metro is looking for a new home


There can’t be many cars in history with lives that began so auspiciously and ended as ignominiously as the Metro. Launched to widespread acclaim and commercial success, it was ultimately left to wither on the vine too long; another BL project that showed enormous promise and wasn’t given sufficient investment (or management) to properly shine. Though the Euro NCAP results for the Rover 100 sealed the little car’s fate, the writing had been on the wall for a long time - the Metro was seriously outdated come the '90s. 

Back in the early '80s, however, it was a supermini from the home team to compete with the very best. There must be millions of us with Metro stories to hand, such was their popularity; it seemed there everyone had a parent or cousin or grandparent (or more than one) with a Metro. They looked smart, drove well, and didn’t cost very much. That the Princess of Wales was gifted one as a birthday present will have done the Metro’s popularity with the general public no harm at all, either.

Once upon a time (and seemingly not that ago), Metros remained everywhere. No longer in the first flushes of youth, sure, though ready to embark on a gentler pace of life as a cute old classic. Then they just seemed to vanish. As with so many cars that were reasonably plentiful and not very valuable at the time, the scrappage schemes will have played a part. So too, however, must have been the country’s undying love for the original Mini. Those that maybe had to choose between saving one or the other would likely plump for the Issigonis icon rather than the '80s supermini. Perhaps nobody wanted an old car they knew performed so badly in a crash (not that any are brilliant). Maybe the complexity Hydragas suspension put some potential suitors off. 

Whatever the truth, you barely ever see Metros now, and near enough never in this sort of condition. It’s one of the fancier 1.3 HLEs, complete with Cinnabar Red paint and Savannah interior, which looks just as smart as it sounds. Somewhat amazingly, too, it’s covered just 14,000 miles since new, or just 350 a year since 1983. Less than a mile a day. 

Encouragingly, it would seem that the driving has been in small and considered doses rather than being parked up for almost four decades. The ad suggests it’s been cherished by five previous owners, apparently all keen to keep it pristine: the paint, rubbers and glass are all original, and it’s been protected against rust. It surely won’t have been outside much in inclement weather. 

The powertrain is said to be sweet, the brakes have been recently serviced and the Hydragas is functioning flawlessly. The asking price is £7,250, or surely a fraction of what a comparable Mini might cost - even contemporary Fiestas are thousands more. And you can bet on favourable attention wherever the Metro goes. Which might be worth the asking price all on its own.


SPECIFICATION | AUSTIN METRO 1.3 HLE

Engine: 1,275cc, four-cyl
Transmission: 4-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 63@5,300rpm
Torque (lb ft): 69@3,200rpm
MPG: N/A
CO2: N/A
Year registered: 1983
Recorded mileage: 14,000
Price new: N/A
Yours for: £7,250

See the original advert here

 

Author
Discussion

Mats

Original Poster:

252 posts

268 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
My first car. Well not as fancy as this. I had the privilege of owning an X reg 1 liter city X. 0 to 60 in about a week. Steering wheel like a lorry. 4 forward gears and brilliant on petrol. In the days that 5 quid got you places. I travelled the country in mine to various raves. It wasn’t fashionable back then in 1992. The rover and MG versions with giant turbo lag were the ones to be seen in. Simpler times indeed. I had a sagging parcel shelf due to the colossal subwoofer installed. Various pullout stereos that I forgot to pull out and were subsequently stolen. Glass was cheap. Broken gearbox as I shifted down too many cogs. Crap driver. Off to the scrappy to get a 30 quid replacement. Greenhouse visibility. Had a small accident. Car crumpled like a paper bag. Off road for 10 weeks while I saved to have it repaired. My parents helped me buy it. 600 quid. So many fond memories. Make no mistake it was a piece of junk but it was mine. 3rd party fire and theft. Fantastic. I can smell the burnt hydrocarbons from the choke today. 😉.

Jon_S_Rally

4,396 posts

114 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
That looks in great condition, and isn't as expensive as I expected. Not something I'd buy, but a nice timewarp. My sister had a Metro as a first car, and my mum had an MG Metro when I was very young, which was eventually traded in for a Nova.

McRors

439 posts

82 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
Divide the price by 10 and it’d be fair but not at that price.

pb8g09

3,110 posts

95 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
They’ve re-badged it you fool!

anonymous-user

80 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
I had one but it was silver and had a rubber type roof spoiler as well.

dontlookdown

2,417 posts

119 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
A+ (geddit?) Festival of the Unexceptional material.

I went in the summer and don't recall seeing many Metros.

They weren't bad cars when introduced but could have done with an engine that didn't date back to 1951.

howardhughes

1,363 posts

230 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
We had a 1.3 in the late eighties. It was great to drive, and very nippy as well. Strong money at 7k though.

Vsix and Vtec

1,363 posts

44 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
Grew up with these. Mum and dad bought an MG Metro from new (the only new car we ever had), metallic grey with black interior, I can still vividly recall the bright red seat belts and the slightly hurried whining noise of the gearbox as it span up through first and second. Never felt they were the best of things, but they were cheap motoring for the underprivileged.

WPA

14,181 posts

140 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
I had a 1.0 HL in brown as my second car, frankly it was crap.

Ok this is low miles and I doubt many are left now as they rotted for England but over £7k, not a chance

Neddy Sea Goon

242 posts

74 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
I'm not driving a mini metro. Say it again Lynne and see what happens, go on say it

I'm not driving a mini metro, I'm not driving a mini metro, I'm not driving a mini metro

See Lynne

irish boy

3,894 posts

262 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
Father in law has a vanden plas. Lovely wee thing.

TheMilkyBarKid

853 posts

55 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
My first car was one of these in exactly the same colour, except it was the even more feeble 1.0. Even all those years ago it was terrible with a truly gutless, wheezy engine, whining gearbox and after pretty much every motorway run it needed the plugs and points doing.

Overtaking sadistic lorry drivers could be painful if they accelerated once you were alongside them and left you hanging in lane 3 desperately trying to inch northwards of 65mph with a queue of Sierras and Cavaliers up your arse impatient to get going.

It was my first car and it gave me my freedom, for which I’ll always be grateful, but all the nostalgia in the world wouldn’t persuade me to have another now. Amazing that it’s survived this long though, mine succumbed to terminal tin worm in the floor pans at 11 years old.

cerb4.5lee

42,577 posts

206 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
This reminds me of the 1988 Metro 1275 Sport I had. That car drove terrible, and I spent all my time trying to contain the rust, however I do still have fond memories of it though. Plus it was the first car that I owned that had a rev counter. cool

sugerbear

6,713 posts

184 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
TheMilkyBarKid said:
My first car was one of these in exactly the same colour, except it was the even more feeble 1.0. Even all those years ago it was terrible with a truly gutless, wheezy engine, whining gearbox and after pretty much every motorway run it needed the plugs and points doing.

Overtaking sadistic lorry drivers could be painful if they accelerated once you were alongside them and left you hanging in lane 3 desperately trying to inch northwards of 65mph with a queue of Sierras and Cavaliers up your arse impatient to get going.

It was my first car and it gave me my freedom, for which I’ll always be grateful, but all the nostalgia in the world wouldn’t persuade me to have another now. Amazing that it’s survived this long though, mine succumbed to terminal tin worm in the floor pans at 11 years old.
Agreed. Horrible car with no redeeming features.

CH3NO2

56 posts

107 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
Never seen the words "marvellous" and "Metro" so close together in the same sentence!

dunnoreally

1,356 posts

134 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
Compared with today's cars, those windows look absolutely enormous.

Dombilano

1,403 posts

81 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
This, or any number of various generation Renaultsport Clio's under £8k?

Hmmmmmmmmmm

Black S2K

1,839 posts

275 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
dontlookdown said:
A+ (geddit?) Festival of the Unexceptional material.

I went in the summer and don't recall seeing many Metros.

They weren't bad cars when introduced but could have done with an engine that didn't date back to 1951.
They ought to have called it the O+. As in bloody...

Actually, the engine was still surprisingly efficient and had a decent throttle response, even if it sounded rather rough. One of the reasons they never replaced it until the Kettle-series came along.

It was what was under it that made the car so awful to drive - putting the gears in the sump and never changing that was a bad idea.

Honda (and Nissan with the otherwise-forgettable 100A) at least followed motorcycle practice and put the cogs in a separate chamber and the results were a lot more palatable.

They otherwise had rather a lot to recommend about them, way back then. I (obviously) preferred the suddenly-ancient FIAT 127...

Surprising how these time-warp examples pop up. Usually because they were driven like a moving chicane by the aged.

Heathwood

2,956 posts

228 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
I just don’t get these very ordinary / dull timewarp cars. So what if it’s barely been used and they’re now somewhat rare. It was st then and it’s st now. And I say that despite the nostalgia of a Metro in that very same colour being my first car.

phil_cardiff

8,411 posts

234 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
Dombilano said:
This, or any number of various generation Renaultsport Clio's under £8k?

Hmmmmmmmmmm
An apple or a tomato? Hmmmmmmmm.

C'mon, this isn't for daily driving, B road blasting or occasional track days. Rightly or wrongly, this is a nostalgic purchase and will be used for festival of the unexceptional and that sort of thing