Benefits Crackdown

Author
Discussion

119

Original Poster:

6,881 posts

38 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all

Vanden Saab

14,207 posts

76 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
Another one...

Eric Mc

122,186 posts

267 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
Where have we heard this before?

I remember Mrs Thatcher and her minions launching "Benefits Crackdowns" 40 plus years ago.

I wonder if the Tories will ever launch a "Multi-Billionaires/Overseas Oligarch Tax Evader/Tory Party Donator" crackdown?

Fermit

13,114 posts

102 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
Sorry, but where Jeromy Hunt is concerned this pretty much sums up my feelings. He's a populist, nothing more.

Remember, for every complicated problem, there's usually a simple yet entirely inappropriate solution.


andymc

7,370 posts

209 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
Sadly it is a lifestyle choice, every Government vows to tackle the work shy

119

Original Poster:

6,881 posts

38 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
Vanden Saab said:
Another one...
True, but lets hope this one is more successful!

Drawweight

2,914 posts

118 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all

My neighbour drives a new car and has 4 holidays a year but is on benefits.

Coming in 3..2…1.

S600BSB

5,111 posts

108 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
Agree there needs to be a root and branch review of the system to make sure the right incentives/support are in place. Also to make it simpler. Hopefully this will be high up the ‘to do’ list of the incoming Labour government.

Mr Pointy

11,341 posts

161 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
Drawweight said:
My neighbour drives a new car and has 4 holidays a year but is on benefits.

Coming in 3..2…1.
If they are on PIP & have a Motability car it can be true, especially if more than one member of the family has weaseled their way on to it.

119

Original Poster:

6,881 posts

38 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
S600BSB said:
Agree there needs to be a root and branch review of the system to make sure the right incentives/support are in place. Also to make it simpler. Hopefully this will be high up the ‘to do’ list of the incoming Labour government.
Well, it would certainly be the first item on it, and then maybe they could add a few more things to it as it seems to be very empty at the moment.

highway

1,977 posts

262 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Where have we heard this before?

I remember Mrs Thatcher and her minions launching "Benefits Crackdowns" 40 plus years ago.

I wonder if the Tories will ever launch a "Multi-Billionaires/Overseas Oligarch Tax Evader/Tory Party Donator" crackdown?
You are right. However, there is also a problem with many claiming benefits they shouldn’t be entitled to. My best twin mates brother- who I went to school with. Never worked since leaving school. A few years cash in hand. Benefits including massively subsidised housing ever since. It’s virtuous to indicate there isn’t a problem at the opposite end of oligarchs and the like. But it’s flawed thinking.

We have needed change and reform for decades.

otolith

56,542 posts

206 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
It does seem that this government's only answer to people being dissatisfied with their circumstances is to promise to make someone else's circumstances worse.

Fermit

13,114 posts

102 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
highway said:
You are right. However, there is also a problem with many claiming benefits they shouldn’t be entitled to. My best twin mates brother- who I went to school with. Never worked since leaving school. A few years cash in hand. Benefits including massively subsidised housing ever since. It’s virtuous to indicate there isn’t a problem at the opposite end of oligarchs and the like. But it’s flawed thinking.

We have needed change and reform for decades.
A problem is, that all too often the most genuine needy individuals get swept up in search reforms. An genuine example. My little sister who has Downs. In the early 2010's my mother had to complete a 30 page questionnaire every 6 months, for her to continue receiving her (much warranted) benefits. Yeah, like she could just happen to wake up one morning without the condition rolleyes

98elise

26,849 posts

163 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
It is remarkable how we can have so many jobs vacancies, and at the same so many people unable to find work.

My son stacks shelves and they are always looking for people. It's not like they're asking for a degree and a few years experience!

8IKERDAVE

2,330 posts

215 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
I've never understood while able bodied people on benefits aren't forced to work for their money. There are absolutely tons of public service jobs they could be doing! This would spur the lazy to find a job they actually enjoy and for those that continue to not look at least the taxpayer is seeing something back for their 'investment'.

I've told both my children, if they ever find themselves on jobseekers, they will be coming to work for me FOC until they find something.

budgie smuggler

5,408 posts

161 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
Drawweight said:
My neighbour drives a new car and has 4 holidays a year but is on benefits.

Coming in 3..2…1.
Or as I saw on twitter recently, when they don't think through their story very well:


smile

deckster

9,630 posts

257 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
highway said:
You are right. However, there is also a problem with many claiming benefits they shouldn’t be entitled to. My best twin mates brother- who I went to school with. Never worked since leaving school. A few years cash in hand. Benefits including massively subsidised housing ever since. It’s virtuous to indicate there isn’t a problem at the opposite end of oligarchs and the like. But it’s flawed thinking.
It's weird this. Everybody I know who relies on benefits is really fking struggling. I mean, really really struggling. I simply don't recognise this viewpoint of free houses & big TVs all round, outside of the Daily Mail of course.

That's not to say that things don't need reform, of course. But it needs to start from a point of view that - people genuinely need help and as tax-payers in a rich country it is our responsibility to make sure that they get it.

To my mind, the real issue is that working at minimum wage simply doesn't buy any kind of a reasonable livelihood, over and above living on benefits. It's a farcical situation where the government needs to issue blanket tax credits and other benefits to people who already have full-time jobs. Which is course is a complex problem that involves house prices, affordable accommodation, inflation of food prices, energy costs and a whole host of other economic issues.

It's not at all obvious to me that taking money away from those who already don't have any is an answer to anything. But I guess it's easy to do and wins you some headlines.

chrispmartha

15,600 posts

131 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
8IKERDAVE said:
'.

I've told both my children, if they ever find themselves on jobseekers, they will be coming to work for me FOC until they find something.
FOC?

Maybe paying them would be better, otherwise they’ll probably tell you to get stuffed.

Tom8

2,197 posts

156 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
Problem is the bad back brigade have now become the "my mental health" brigade. Strange how we create reasons for people to not take responsibility.

In all political areas there are the genuine and the not so and sadly the genuines suffer. See asylum seekers as another example. There are many people who have never made any effort to work and refuse to do so. Most people are however capable of something.

As above welfare should be made like community service, earn the money not just be given it. I would prefer the european model where you earn similar to your last wage no matter how high for a shorter period of time rather than perennial universal welfare.

mac96

3,849 posts

145 months

Friday 17th November 2023
quotequote all
otolith said:
It does seem that this government's only answer to people being dissatisfied with their circumstances is to promise to make someone else's circumstances worse.
Unfortunately it is not just this government. The main difference is who 'someone else' is.