RE: Mercedes-AMG turns new E53 into plug-in hybrid

RE: Mercedes-AMG turns new E53 into plug-in hybrid

Monday 11th March

Mercedes-AMG turns new E53 into plug-in hybrid

Up to 612hp, with up to 62 miles of electrical range...


It takes years of work to create a new car and fresh models don’t get knocked up according to the short-term vagaries of the news cycle. Even knowing that the announcement of the new Mercedes-AMG E53 Hybrid seems a remarkably neat bit of timing, news dropping as car makers big and small start to admit the move to full electrification is likely to be slower and more gradual than previously suggested. As a plug-in hybrid capable of delivering both 612hp and up to 62 miles of pure electric range, the E53 Hybrid suddenly seems to be answering a lot of questions.

While AMG versions of the recently introduced W214 E-Class were inevitable, the output of what will be the junior version still comes as a surprise. The last generation E53 had a 3.0-litre twin-turbocharged petrol straight-six that made an entirely respectable 429hp. The new one has a very similar six-pot that makes 443hp by itself, but which works in conjunction with a 161hp electric motor. 

The two peaks don’t exactly add together, though AMG quotes 576hp as an everyday max, and up to 612hp with the ‘Race Start’ mode that will come as part of the optional AMG Dynamic Plus package. By a happy non coincidence, that is exactly the same maximum output that the previous generation E63 S made from its monstrous V8. AMG quotes a 0-62mph time for the E53 Hybrid saloon of 3.8 seconds in Race Start and 4.0 seconds without it; the corresponding numbers for the estate are just a tenth quicker. 

But the E53 Hybrid is also a plug-in which will boast a serious electric range. Yes, you can certainly take the official 18g/km CO2 rating with a pound of salt. But a sizeable 21.2kWh battery pack mounted under the rear floor is big enough to allow for the headline range figure, with AMG chasing the 100km/62-mile WLTP figure that will unlock EV tax benefits in some countries. Even if that turns out to be a very best-case scenario, the E53 will still be able to cover substantial distances without using its petrol engine. When running as an EV it can drive at up to 87mph and, as with other hybrid Mercs, it will have a haptic accelerator pedal that will stiffen to indicate the point at which maximum electrical power is being delivered, pushing beyond that firing the engine.

The E53 Hybrid is also going to be easier to recharge than most EVs tend to be, certainly for buyers taking the option of a 60kW DC fast charger. Make full use of this and it will be possible to take the pack from 10 per cent to 80 per cent in as little as 20 minutes, even without specifying that there will be a 11kW onboard AC charger. This definitely isn’t intended to be one of those tax-cheating plug-ins which get part-exed with an unused charging lead in the boot. 

Compared to the impressive potency of its powertrain, the E53 Hybrid is a bit visually timid. Its position above the regular E-Class is indicated by a radiator grille that now features AMG’s trademark vertical slats, and which is now surrounded by illuminated elements that show its shape at night. Yes, that is now a thing. But it also features a disappointing number of fake vents; closer inspection of the ones on the front wings show they are cosmetic blanks, also the pseudo-outlets set into the rear bumper. One detail for the eagle-eyed is the red surround for the E53 badge, this being Merc’s way of showing that the car is hybridized (as there will continue to be non-hybrid 53 models.)

The E53’s interior is similarly close to that of the regular E-Class, with sports seats and some subtle AMG branding but with unchanged cabin architecture - the days of AMG models getting their own chunky gear shifters seem far off. There will be the option of a ‘Superscreen’ configuration that adds a passenger side monitor to the vast centre screen, this in place of a standard configuration of an open-pore wood which actually looks a fair bit classier. The gearchange paddles on the steering wheel now have a dual function, selecting ratios in the normal way when the engine is running, but also varying levels of regenerative braking when the car is running electrically. The most aggressive of these will function as a one-pedal mode.

The E53 Hybrid will have double-valve adaptive dampers and rear-wheel steering as standard. It has also been given some additional body reinforcement including a crossbrace at the front and beefier rear axle mounts. Standard brakes will have four-pot front calipers biting on 14.5-inch diameter vented discs, but the Dynamic Plus pack will upgrade those to six-pot calipers and bigger 15.3-inch rotors. Given an EU kerbweight (with driver) of 2,315kg for the saloon - a 345kg increase on the last E53 - more brakes sound like a good idea.

Then there’s the other obvious question - given the E53 Hybrid’s dramatically increased power output, what is the forthcoming E63 going to be making? Place your bets…


Author
Discussion

Harry_523

Original Poster:

384 posts

101 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
That's very nasty

AlexMG

85 posts

149 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
It's not a V8 but I welcome a straight six turbo that can actually be pretty nice over a 4 pot like in the C63, the range on that hybrid system makes it really useful that fuel costs wouldn't be ruinous.

I'd be tempted if I was the target consumer for this!

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,102 posts

100 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
Strange - with that sort of power, I would have thought the acceleration figures would have been lower.

I guess those batteries are making their weight felt ?

pb8g09

2,442 posts

71 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
It's a thumbs up from me for design and drivetrain.

Not the finest looking rear end but nothing particularly offensive about any of it.


CLK-GTR

877 posts

247 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
Looks like they might have learned something from the C63 launch. The E63 powertrain will be the one to really watch out for.

WY86

1,378 posts

29 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
Maybe a dumb question but where do the airbags eject from on the passenger side? with new cars the trend seems to be fitting a front passenger screen but i would of thought that space would be occupied by an airbag? Shame no price mentioned as i suspect it will be very high even for an AMG-lite.

GreatScott2016

1,261 posts

90 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
I’m trying to find redeeming features with this, but simply can’t. I get some will love it, the brand, hybrid tech, big performance and so on …. , but it’s not for me.

Jader1973

4,099 posts

202 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
WY86 said:
Maybe a dumb question but where do the airbags eject from on the passenger side?
They deploy out of the upper surface of the dash.

A lot of cars, even those without screens, do that.

fantheman80

1,488 posts

51 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
Strange - with that sort of power, I would have thought the acceleration figures would have been lower.

I guess those batteries are making their weight felt ?
id say 3.8 is more than adequate..!

Dombilano

1,201 posts

57 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
2.3 tonnes, fat pig

MountainsofSussex

290 posts

188 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
I thought the purpose of the "one rung from the top" models like this, Audi S etc was to rather rapidly whisk you from A to B, regardless of what's in-between in comfort without attracting the wrong sort of attention and without the downsides (ride, noise, fuel, "image") of the full fat models. This looks too conceptually close to the full fat, leaving a bit of a hole in the range, IMHO

E90_M3Ross

35,227 posts

214 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
Strange - with that sort of power, I would have thought the acceleration figures would have been lower.

I guess those batteries are making their weight felt ?
600bhp with about 2.25tonnes 3.8 seems very good. Why would you expect it much faster? I'd say seems about right.

Mouse Rat

1,833 posts

94 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
Its too heavy to be a sports saloon but I kinda like it. Economical, practical & fast and an E class.
Other than the 'Bradford Wedding' look, I bet it could be rather subtle spec'd right.

DonkeyApple

56,370 posts

171 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
GreatScott2016 said:
I’m trying to find redeeming features with this, but simply can’t. I get some will love it, the brand, hybrid tech, big performance and so on …. , but it’s not for me.
Not really a Merc fan but this does have some r seeming features. It's a straight 6, which is good. No turbos, which is great. It doesn't have a cheap stick on TV look, which is a pleasant change. Appears to still have some tactile controls. And has enough battery power to do a basic chore run. In Estate form it would actually be a pretty nice allround family and chore wagon. Generally, I think it is a good thing to use a hybrid system to do away with turbos in generic everyday cars. And I wonder if manufacturers are getting a sniff that hybrids may get a longer sales life than was believed 24 months ago?

JackJarvis

2,339 posts

136 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
Cars like this used to make excellent used purchases in 5+ years time when they've done the heaviest depreciation.. I'm not sure I'd want to own something with this much technology out of warranty.

EV8

57 posts

5 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
GreatScott2016 said:
I’m trying to find redeeming features with this, but simply can’t. I get some will love it, the brand, hybrid tech, big performance and so on …. , but it’s not for me.
Not really a Merc fan but this does have some r seeming features. It's a straight 6, which is good. No turbos, which is great.
No turbos? It is a biturbo.
NA engines are dead.

Twoshoe

867 posts

186 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
Surprised the estate is quicker (at least to 60) - I thought they were normally a bit heavier and therefore slower.

CountyAFC

847 posts

5 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Not really a Merc fan but this does have some r seeming features. It's a straight 6, which is good. No turbos, which is great. It doesn't have a cheap stick on TV look, which is a pleasant change. Appears to still have some tactile controls. And has enough battery power to do a basic chore run. In Estate form it would actually be a pretty nice allround family and chore wagon. Generally, I think it is a good thing to use a hybrid system to do away with turbos in generic everyday cars. And I wonder if manufacturers are getting a sniff that hybrids may get a longer sales life than was believed 24 months ago?
Eh? It's twin turbo.

It's even got TURBO written on the side of it.

DonkeyApple

56,370 posts

171 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
EV8 said:
DonkeyApple said:
GreatScott2016 said:
I’m trying to find redeeming features with this, but simply can’t. I get some will love it, the brand, hybrid tech, big performance and so on …. , but it’s not for me.
Not really a Merc fan but this does have some r seeming features. It's a straight 6, which is good. No turbos, which is great.
No turbos? It is a biturbo.
NA engines are dead.
That's a shame. The article read to me like they'd ditched the turbos. frown.

JAMSXR

1,556 posts

49 months

Monday 11th March
quotequote all
I wish I would get more exited about this. I’m not sure if it’s the design language, (tacky) interior or stop gap drive chain. I suspect BMW and Audi will do a better job.