Fuse 22

Author
Discussion

GilesS3

Original Poster:

100 posts

266 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
Have had my DB9 for 6 months now, and several people have said about removing 'fuse 22' to make it sound better. Will this invalidate my warranty or effect the way the car runs? Or will it just make it sound better? Don't want to do anything that will create a problem!! Any advice welcome!

Murph7355

37,986 posts

258 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
No, no, yes.

V8VDan

52 posts

173 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
I bought my Vantage from AM and it was already out when I came to do the deed (I had wondered just how much better sounding it could get so it made sense that it wasn't in). I guess they are OK with it, as it's pretty obvious when it's not in so they would have picked it up.

bogie

16,450 posts

274 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
my dealer took it out for the test drive too ....ive never owned an Aston with it fitted smile

its just for noise regs...makes them quieter under 4K revs to pass the tests, over 4K revs sounds like it should ...when you remove it, it sounds well all the time smile

mikey k

13,014 posts

218 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Picking my V8VR up next weekend
I plan on adding a switch (less obtrusive than the works on! wink )via an "add a fuse" to fuse 22
Should help keep the neighbours happy smile

Steve*B

670 posts

210 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
GilesS3 said:
Have had my DB9 for 6 months now, and several people have said about removing 'fuse 22' to make it sound better. Will this invalidate my warranty or effect the way the car runs? Or will it just make it sound better? Don't want to do anything that will create a problem!! Any advice welcome!
There is a trade off having the fuse out permanently with a noticeable reduction in torque for those first 4k of revs as documented over on AMOC. However, most would agree it's a price worth paying although getting a switch fitted gives you the best of both worlds.

GilesS3

Original Poster:

100 posts

266 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Thank you all for your help. You have reassured me that it won't be an issue with AM. Will try it this week!!


Murph7355

37,986 posts

258 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Steve*B said:
....
There is a trade off having the fuse out permanently with a noticeable reduction in torque for those first 4k of revs as documented over on AMOC. ...
They must have ultra sensitive backsides as I never noticed anything.

I would love to see proper, empirical back to back tests to prove this. Both seeing the same car before and after, and seeing two cars go head to head on a road smile

My guess is that the real world differences are so small as to be inconsequential.

rick-derby-

1,105 posts

189 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
There is a small difference in the torque and only low down, and in real world terms hardly noticeable in most driving situations,

Steve*B

670 posts

210 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
I would love to see proper, empirical back to back tests to prove this. Both seeing the same car before and after, and seeing two cars go head to head on a road smile
Murph, stop being tight and get the switch fitted you'll notice it then hehe

'Noticeable' means you notice it though having to stop the car between the 'in and out' means you're less likely to perceive any change. Back to back has already been carried out, check out the thread

http://www.amoc.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&a...

....and made a difference of 0.2 of a second to 100KM/HR

Not a huge difference but perceptible wink

Murph7355

37,986 posts

258 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Steve*B said:
...
....and made a difference of 0.2 of a second to 100KM/HR...
I'd rather save the 300 quid. Anyway, it SOUNDS 1sec quicker to 100km/h with the fuse out biggrin

Steve*B

670 posts

210 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Actually, I must be getting old because I'm beginning to agree with the sentiments of another poster over on AMOC when he said 'Uncorked, the noise is very muscle car V8 and much less exotic'. To me, it's definitely more of a truck-like exhaust note than a tuned V8 at low revs and you do actually appreciate the exhaust note more at 4k revs when it's still corked.

Rick, any news on the release of Astons own sports exhaust? They were working on it as long ago as November last year.

GJOB

419 posts

195 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
GilesS3 said:
Have had my DB9 for 6 months now, and several people have said about removing 'fuse 22' to make it sound better. Will this invalidate my warranty or effect the way the car runs? Or will it just make it sound better? Don't want to do anything that will create a problem!! Any advice welcome!
it is much less noticeable on the 9 compared to the Vantage but you should do it anyway wink

Murph7355

37,986 posts

258 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Steve*B said:
Actually, I must be getting old because I'm beginning to agree with the sentiments of another poster over on AMOC when he said 'Uncorked, the noise is very muscle car V8 and much less exotic'. To me, it's definitely more of a truck-like exhaust note than a tuned V8 at low revs and you do actually appreciate the exhaust note more at 4k revs when it's still corked. ....
You're def spending too much time over there biggrin


Steve*B

670 posts

210 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
You're def spending too much time over there biggrin
You're right, even the GTB is starting to look attractive whistle

rick-derby-

1,105 posts

189 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Hi Steve it's seems it has all gone quiet on their own sports exhaust, but if I hear anything I will let you know,

Steve*B

670 posts

210 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for that Rick & thanks again for the foam.....car feels whole again smile

rick-derby-

1,105 posts

189 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
no problem Steve your welcome,

Neil1300R

5,490 posts

180 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Steve*B said:
Murph7355 said:
I would love to see proper, empirical back to back tests to prove this. Both seeing the same car before and after, and seeing two cars go head to head on a road smile
Murph, stop being tight and get the switch fitted you'll notice it then hehe

'Noticeable' means you notice it though having to stop the car between the 'in and out' means you're less likely to perceive any change. Back to back has already been carried out, check out the thread

http://www.amoc.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&a...

....and made a difference of 0.2 of a second to 100KM/HR

Not a huge difference but perceptible wink
Something doesn't add up - to do fast 0-100KM/H you need lots of revs right from the start - car would never be below 4000rpm during a run so exhaust valves open all the time.

Would go and run my own tests but wouldn't be able to put up with the smell of the clutch being abused!

Murph7355

37,986 posts

258 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Neil1300R said:
Something doesn't add up - to do fast 0-100KM/H you need lots of revs right from the start - car would never be below 4000rpm during a run so exhaust valves open all the time.

Would go and run my own tests but wouldn't be able to put up with the smell of the clutch being abused!
Exactly.

You'd more likely notice improvements in the torque curve during in gear acceleration. And even then, I reckon any theoretical advantage of having fuse 22 in would be massively overturned by simply dropping down a cog.

Still, however people want to justify spending a few hundred quid and bdising their steering column is fine by me biggrin