WITHOUT CAMERA SIGN BEEN CAUGHT BY MOBILE CAMERA SYSTEM

[ismail.ilgin]

Hi Everyone
I been receive mobile speed camera fine. Before this when i seen this mobile system i called 101 police and report them because there are parked without camera sigh road and also i get confirm its not police car from 101 police line and also confirm by council they didnt send this mobile system to there. Only 1 camera sign 1,1 mile before they parked. From police and council i get confirm by phone and recorded this by phone its UNAUTHORISED by both side. What can i do for that letter? Its been send by central ticket office, gmppas.co.uk.

Anyone have similar problem or knowledge about that?

Thanks

[HantsRat]

There is no requirement for a camera sign.

[davek_964]

HantsRat said:

There is no requirement for a camera sign.

Quite. In fact I've never ever encountered a mobile speed trap that had a warning sign before it!

[ismail.ilgin]

HantsRat said:

There is no requirement for a camera sign.

What about this? Is there speed camera since who knows but completely DARK BLUE? Also far as i know trap speed camera against the law as well ?

In 2001 the law was changed so that speed cameras had to be painted yellow to ensure visibility. ... cameras must be visible from 60m away in 40mph or less zones and 100m for all other speed limit zones. signs must only be placed in areas where camera housings are located or where mobile cameras are in operation.

[Monkeylegend]

ismail.ilgin said:

Hi Everyone
I been receive mobile speed camera fine. Before this when i seen this mobile system i called 101 police and report them because there are parked without camera sigh road and also i get confirm its not police car from 101 police line and also confirm by council they didnt send this mobile system to there. Only 1 camera sign 1,1 mile before they parked. From police and council i get confirm by phone and recorded this by phone its UNAUTHORISED by both side. What can i do for that letter? Its been send by central ticket office, gmppas.co.uk.

Anyone have similar problem or knowledge about that?

Thanks

You can go to court and challenge it based on what you have posted or you can do a speed awareness course if offered or you can pay the fine.

How fast were you going and what was the speed limit?

[FurtiveFreddy]

[eybic]

ismail.ilgin said:

HantsRat said:

There is no requirement for a camera sign.

What about this? Is there speed camera since who knows but completely DARK BLUE? Also far as i know trap speed camera against the law as well ?

In 2001 the law was changed so that speed cameras had to be painted yellow to ensure visibility. ... cameras must be visible from 60m away in 40mph or less zones and 100m for all other speed limit zones. signs must only be placed in areas where camera housings are located or where mobile cameras are in operation.

That ruling was only for police forces that kept the money from speeding fines although I'm not sure they still have to be painted like that. Suck it up, you were speeding and got caught, if you aren't prepared to accept it then don't speed.

[davek_964]

ismail.ilgin said:

In 2001 the law was changed so that speed cameras had to be painted yellow to ensure visibility. ... cameras must be visible from 60m away in 40mph or less zones and 100m for all other speed limit zones. signs must only be placed in areas where camera housings are located or where mobile cameras are in operation.

[HantsRat]

ismail.ilgin said:

In 2001 the law was changed so that speed cameras had to be painted yellow to ensure visibility. ... cameras must be visible from 60m away in 40mph or less zones and 100m for all other speed limit zones. signs must only be placed in areas where camera housings are located or where mobile cameras are in operation.

There are no requirement for mobile camera vans. They do not need to display a sign. They can even hide in a horse box if they so wish...

[FurtiveFreddy]

Blue camera van:



Blue camera van:



Blue camera van:



Shall I go on?

[ismail.ilgin]

FurtiveFreddy said:

Blue camera van:



Blue camera van:



Blue camera van:



Shall I go on?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

I AM TALKING ABOUT FIXED BLUE CAMERA NOT MOBILE VAN. I DONT CARE ALSO LAW MOBILE VAN COLOUR. BY THE LAW FIXED CAMERAS MUST BE YELLOW.

SHALL I GO ON ?

[FurtiveFreddy]

ismail.ilgin said:

Hi Everyone
I been receive mobile speed camera fine. Before this when i seen this mobile system

Do you understand the difference between the words 'fixed' and 'mobile'?

[ismail.ilgin]

Monkeylegend said:

You can go to court and challenge it based on what you have posted or you can do a speed awareness course if offered or you can pay the fine.

How fast were you going and what was the speed limit?

According to letter 41 mph by 30 road, i do not believe it because i seen this van staying here every week once so i never go speed because i know where they are ! But almost impossible to proof it .

[ismail.ilgin]

eybic said:

That ruling was only for police forces that kept the money from speeding fines although I'm not sure they still have to be painted like that. Suck it up, you were speeding and got caught, if you aren't prepared to accept it then don't speed.

As always stupid answer like you we will seen i guess.

[HantsRat]

Your first post you said mobile now you are saying fixed.

Post a streetview link to the fixed camera.

[FurtiveFreddy]

Thread going well for OP so far...

Here's a lovely blue camera, BTW:

[ismail.ilgin]

FurtiveFreddy said:

Do you understand the difference between the words 'fixed' and 'mobile'?

What kind of question is? Are you dump or you thing everyone is dump except you? What is relative between my question and your stupid answer?

[eybic]

ismail.ilgin said:

eybic said:

That ruling was only for police forces that kept the money from speeding fines although I'm not sure they still have to be painted like that. Suck it up, you were speeding and got caught, if you aren't prepared to accept it then don't speed.

As always stupid answer like you we will seen i guess.

You're the one that has been caught speeding, not me

[Graveworm]

davek_964 said:

It's not been tested but in theory a caught can exclude any evidence that has been unfairly obtained. That could definitely include where a code of practice has been breached. But the court does not have too. They have to weigh up whether the probative value outweighs the prejudice.
Even more of a stretch would be to revisit the whole self incrimination if codes of practice are not complied with as the original HR finding was based on proportionality.....
Personally I would pay up or be more careful in the first place..

[davek_964]

ismail.ilgin said:

I AM TALKING ABOUT FIXED BLUE CAMERA NOT MOBILE VAN. I DONT CARE ALSO LAW MOBILE VAN COLOUR. BY THE LAW FIXED CAMERAS MUST BE YELLOW.

SHALL I GO ON ?

ismail.ilgin said:

mobile speed camera fine. Before this when i seen this mobile system i called 101 police and report them because there are parked without camera sigh road and also i get confirm its not police car from 101 police line and also confirm by council they didnt send this mobile system to there.

Thanks

ismail.ilgin said:

According to letter 41 mph by 30 road, i do not believe it because i seen this van staying here every week once so i never go speed because i know where they are ! But almost impossible to proof it .

You really don't have a clue do you?