Police Forces to merge - Good or Bad idea?

Police Forces to merge - Good or Bad idea?

Author
Discussion

TonyRec

Original Poster:

3,984 posts

257 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
I for one think it would be a good idea to reduce the number of forces to around 12.

From what i have seen, theres too much red tape restricting the way the job is done, with different types of equipment, individual force area boundarys, the different ways that crimes are investigated and the way that both process and prisoners are subsequently dealt with.

On the downside, a number of Chief Constables and 'other' high ranking Officers would have to move or lose their jobs but im not sure that this would be a bad thing

What do you think?

deltafox

3,839 posts

234 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
Bad. Fat people cant move very quickly.

puggit

48,571 posts

250 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
I think it will be a fine time for the politicos to remove the CCs they don't like (Durham anyone...).

I have reservations in that control centres might not understand the geography/dynamics of areas they are taking calls from (this is already creating problems for the fire service IIRC).

JMGS4

8,741 posts

272 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
If it's going to get rid of wasteful burocracy and burocrats then it's good BUT
I have reservations about centralised responses especially for the people "out in the sticks" AND
I don't like the idea of central government getting more "control" over the police which this move will inevitably do...
The "service" is supposed to be divorced from govmint isn't it (CC and all that being appointed by police boards)???? This makes more chances of the socio-fascists in govmint using the service for their own blatantly hypocritical ends.......

autismuk

1,529 posts

242 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
Control freakery. The closer to the centre the more the cops will be forced to follow the diktats of the Blairstapo.

I'll believe it cuts bureaucracy when I see it. Every other idiot NuLabor claim to reduce such has failed miserably, doubt this will be any different.

TonyRec

Original Poster:

3,984 posts

257 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
There are obviously some contemporary issues that need to be addressed but i fear that the ship has already set sail.

(bloomin hell, did i say that.......!)

apache

39,731 posts

286 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
TonyRec said:
I for one think it would be a good idea to reduce the number of forces to around 12.

From what i have seen, theres too much red tape restricting the way the job is done, with different types of equipment, individual force area boundarys, the different ways that crimes are investigated and the way that both process and prisoners are subsequently dealt with.

On the downside, a number of Chief Constables and 'other' high ranking Officers would have to move or lose their jobs but im not sure that this would be a bad thing

What do you think?


depends who gets the job, can you imagine if someone with an impecable record held sway over such a large police force? someone like Brunstrom for instance?

jesus that thought nearly brought on a panic attack

TonyRec

Original Poster:

3,984 posts

257 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
To be fair though Pete, they are all puppets and only say what their advisors advise.
This is self evident in the fact that they all bring out books when retired contradicting what they said when they were in office.

apache

39,731 posts

286 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
TonyRec said:
To be fair though Pete, they are all puppets and only say what their advisors advise.
This is self evident in the fact that they all bring out books when retired contradicting what they said when they were in office.



Really? I didn't know that. So who pulls the strings for CC Brunstrom? I was under the impression he was a bit of a loose cannon

TonyRec

Original Poster:

3,984 posts

257 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
I dont know but i would like to know.

You certainly wont see a CC going against the grain, if they do, they dont last long.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

272 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
TonyRec said:
I dont know but i would like to know.

You certainly wont see a CC going against the grain, if they do, they dont last long.


What did happen to the Lambeth chap in the end?

Big Fat F'er

893 posts

227 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
deltafox said:
Bad. Fat people cant move very quickly.


You've obviously never seen me coming out of a Jewellers at 3 o'clock in the morning, hearing the words on the CB "they're creeping round the corner now without lights on"...

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

258 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
As usual it's hard to know who to believe. Those in favour say that having larger forces will make it easier to provide "bobbies on the beat" because they won't have to keep dragging them away to handle triple murder cases. Those against say that a larger force will lose the personal touch that keeps them close to their local residents.

As a Warwickshire resident I have to say that I don't notice the personal touch, and I live 1/4 mile from the Warwickshire HQ. I presume that would close and a new HQ be built somewhere else, as I'm sure no building currently owned by the police would be big enough to house them all (£££.

I work for a company where we build virtual teams across lines of business to staff projects. It's normal to have teleconferences instead of face-to-face meetings. Why do we need a reorganisation to achieve teamwork by the police? Why can't we just expect them to cooperate to get the wider job done, the same way that companies do? It would be an awful lot cheaper.

aldi

9,243 posts

239 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
I don't know how much will actually change at ground level, probably not much?

mondeoman

11,430 posts

268 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
aldi said:
I don't know how much will actually change at ground level, probably not much?


It'll get worse - they'll send a bobby from 100 miles away to attend your break in - he'll get lost, won't know the local scotes and it'll just be another insurance number issuing job.

NO NO NO!

apache

39,731 posts

286 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
mondeoman said:
they'll send a bobby from 100 miles away to attend your break in -


in my experience that would be called progress

^Slider^

2,874 posts

251 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
The jury is still out for me im afraid. As the situation is still being discussed no one has told us how it will benifit us as the police and you as the public.

All we have been told is there are 3 plans for my force which is one of the larger forces in the country.

1) Stay as we are as we technically are a strategic force in terms of size.
2) Merge with 1 or 2 smaller forces.
3) create a new south east force with 2 large police forces.

I cant see it making a blind bit of difference at ground level. Will help with streamlines procedures and information between forces which are merged.

But in reality to get each force to the same level of technology will take bloomin years.

The only thing i can think of is the buying power of 1 large force compared to 3 smaller forces when it comes to kit.

Hanse Cronje

2,213 posts

223 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
^Slider^ said:


I cant see it making a blind bit of difference at ground level. Will help with streamlines procedures and information between forces which are merged.



do away with them all and just have one then

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

246 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
It will all end in tears....

I have been through two amalgamations after initially joining a relatively small efficient County Force.

Big is NOT beautiful far from it - impersonality creeps in as does indifference. Little or no allegience to the area. Big white chiefs in Ivory Towers out of touch with the ground troops who ARE THE POLICE SERVICE. Which is why certain nortern forces have rejected proposal.

Mutal Aid arrangements and MACP from Military can cope with what Clarke claims.

Glad I am out.

Scenario to watch:

This will go ahead. Same time massive influx of plasic cops (CSO/HA etc).

Five years time, call for ONE NATIONAL POLICE FORCE.

Trained police, severely depleted into a FBI along with SOCA - CSO 's (at cheap rate) etc to police the sticks and local community. May even get a Sheriff of West Yorkshire
(interested fif?).

dvd

catso

14,814 posts

269 months

Thursday 22nd December 2005
quotequote all
I don't really see why we need the Police anymore, I mean we have all these wonderful Cameras.........