RE: 7 Years Jail For Texting Drivers Who Kill

RE: 7 Years Jail For Texting Drivers Who Kill

Wednesday 16th July 2008

7 Years Jail For Texting Drivers Who Kill

New guidelines mean a text behind the wheel could cost you seven years


Practice safe text
Practice safe text
Drivers who kill while reading or texting could face up to seven years in jail under new guidelines, it has been reported. The Sentencing Guidelines Council, which is chaired by the Lord Chief Justice, has recommended that judges and magistrates hand out the tougher penalties.

Very serious cases, where drugs, alcohol or persistent bad driving are involved, could warrant a jail term of up to 14 years, the council said. A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice said: ‘Ensuring drivers who cause death on our roads through bad driving are suitably punished is essential if justice is to be done.’

Ministers now want to see the two new offences – causing death by careless driving and causing death while unlicenced, disqualified or uninsured – pushed through as soon as possible. The council said it wanted to send a ‘clear message’ to those who text while driving that it will not be tolerated.

The new guidelines will be imposed on offenders sentenced on or after August 4 on existing offences. The guidelines state that if someone causes a death while texting or if they are distracted by a phone it will be treated as a ‘higher level of seriousness’ and they will face up to seven years behind bars.

Peter Neyroud, a council member, said of the new guidelines: ‘This has been welcomed by those representing families and friends of victims…There will be more custodial sentences and community sentences.’

Author
Discussion

Rawwr

Original Poster:

22,722 posts

236 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
People who use text as a verb should get another seven years. Heathens!

grumbledoak

31,584 posts

235 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
Hmm. Surely the existing laws cover this anyway? It just sounds like they are making the illegal more illegal.

"Message Politics", 'cos if they say it we'll do it. rolleyes


Edited by grumbledoak on Wednesday 16th July 12:08

DamoLLb

1,775 posts

197 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
Hmm. Surely the existing laws cover this anyway? It just sounds like they are making the illegal more illegal. "Message Politics".
Kind of, except the the Road safety Act just makes it clearer and the CPS give using a mobile phone as an example

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

257 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
Because although you may not have insurance, or tax, you may not be driving dangerously. Texting is construed as dangerous driving...

cvegas

323 posts

205 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
I promise never to knowingly text drivers who kill. Not that I know any anyway!

Vipers

32,943 posts

230 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
a) UP TO 7 years. so who will ever get 7 years?

Personally I think that no matter what you do, if your acts and omissions cause a death to other road users, the penalty should be the same, what is the difference? "Er I was texting my lud, and didnt see the ped,", "7 years my man"

"Er I wasnt paying attention, I was changing the CD in my multi CD player, didnt see the ped", "OK £1000 fine"................. but you see my drift.

I still think that if they increased the first offence to using a mobile in contradiction of the road laws resulted in a £1000 fine, it might make people think first.

smile


tom2019

770 posts

197 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
thats fine i think but..

it would be good if you got a least that for stabbing someone to death

not some stupid gbh or manslaughter charge

derestrictor

18,764 posts

263 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
Behavioural conditioning reaches frenzied proportions of gonad crushing orgasm.

I remember the glory days of 3 years back, flying down the outside lane of Highway X, a chuffing great Motorola welded to my ridiculously overcoiffeured bouffant, importing, exporting whilst all the while, slightly soiled £50s flying out the window to the tune of Land of Confusion by Genesis as my thoughts drifted away from the communists I was blsting past, worrying disproportionately about the shade of egg shell I should select for my new batch of business cards...

The scale of 'disconnect' between the law makers, the law enforcers and the poor saps who fund their deluded crusades is now immense.

Persuaded into pastures of totalitarian redress via 11 years of increasingly wretched, constantly ratcheting meddling, the establishment has completely lost it's sense of perspective.

These bds are succeeding in dehumanising us where Hitler and Stalin failed.

What an absolute fiasco. The Mob rules. Well done Brake and The Histrionics, another lasceration in the UK's dying rattle, freedom expunged by a thousand such cuts.

VERMIN.

ahaughton

729 posts

229 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
So, with the jails overcrowded I presume they'll release those guilty of rape and murder so they can 'bang up' the texters....

red_zed

2,663 posts

205 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
scare tactics for the youger generation who, i would imagine, are more guilty of texting whilst driving that anyone else??

the irony is that most people can probably text without even looking at their phone, whereas other distractions in the car such as changing a cd, or fiddling with the radio, or- and i make no apologies for saying this- women checking their makeup in the mirror, most definitely require a moments distraction from the road ahead


paul001

327 posts

239 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
It would be nice to see our wonderful government start inforcing the maximum terms for other such crimes such as carrying knives - we can live in hope

EU_Foreigner

2,834 posts

228 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
Putting a destination in my satnav whilst driving is exactly the same effort as texting. One carries up to 7 years prison, the other, well, nothing I guess. Why differentiate?

jazzyjeff

3,652 posts

261 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
red_zed said:
scare tactics for the youger generation who, i would imagine, are more guilty of texting whilst driving that anyone else??

the irony is that most people can probably text without even looking at their phone, whereas other distractions in the car such as changing a cd, or fiddling with the radio, or- and i make no apologies for saying this- women checking their makeup in the mirror, most definitely require a moments distraction from the road ahead
A moment's distraction, yes. Composing and sending a text would no doubt distract you for tens of seconds, maybe minutes.

I get vertigo watching people driving in a movie and not paying attention to the road(and they aren't really driving)!

JJ

Frimley111R

15,719 posts

236 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
EU_Foreigner said:
Putting a destination in my satnav whilst driving is exactly the same effort as texting. One carries up to 7 years prison, the other, well, nothing I guess. Why differentiate?
I think you'd get something very similar for causing death by carelessness.

Collaudatore

1,055 posts

204 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
Article said:
causing death while unlicenced
You need a License to Kill?

covertjouster

50 posts

204 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
"The council said it wanted to send a ‘clear message’ to those who text while driving that it will not be tolerated."

and

The Government says it wants to send a ‘clear message’ to those who drive that it will not be tolerated.

jon-

16,511 posts

218 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
covertjouster said:
"The council said it wanted to send a ‘clear message’ to those who text while driving that it will not be tolerated."

and

The Government says it wants to send a ‘clear message’ to those who drive that it will not be tolerated.
Lets hope they don't send those messages by text.

oagent

1,811 posts

245 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
From what I hear, composing a text would be classed and "dangerous" while a brief look at your phone would be classes as "careless".

Anything that briefly diverts your attention from the road ahead could be classed as "careless" (radio, sat nav etc).

Would this make any death caused by the diver looking at confusing signage or speed cameras "careless" too?

MK4 Slowride

10,028 posts

210 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
jon- said:
covertjouster said:
"The council said it wanted to send a ‘clear message’ to those who text while driving that it will not be tolerated."

and

The Government says it wants to send a ‘clear message’ to those who drive that it will not be tolerated.
Lets hope they don't send those messages by text.
laugh


Why is it unlicenced drivers & all that entails get let off so lightly.

Magners P.H

6,631 posts

216 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
derestrictor said:
Behavioural conditioning reaches frenzied proportions of gonad crushing orgasm.

I remember the glory days of 3 years back, flying down the outside lane of Highway X, a chuffing great Motorola welded to my ridiculously overcoiffeured bouffant, importing, exporting whilst all the while, slightly soiled £50s flying out the window to the tune of Land of Confusion by Genesis as my thoughts drifted away from the communists I was blsting past, worrying disproportionately about the shade of egg shell I should select for my new batch of business cards...

The scale of 'disconnect' between the law makers, the law enforcers and the poor saps who fund their deluded crusades is now immense.

Persuaded into pastures of totalitarian redress via 11 years of increasingly wretched, constantly ratcheting meddling, the establishment has completely lost it's sense of perspective.

These bds are succeeding in dehumanising us where Hitler and Stalin failed.

What an absolute fiasco. The Mob rules. Well done Brake and The Histrionics, another lasceration in the UK's dying rattle, freedom expunged by a thousand such cuts.

VERMIN.
Always a pleasure to read your coherent and intellectual posts Derestrictor smile