Chris Kaba Shooting

[freedman]

News this morning says the reporting restrictions on naming the officer will be removed on 1st March

They also said the trial wont start until October

[LosingGrip]

Wasn't it meant to be 31/01? Wonder why it's been extended.

[Roman Moroni]

LosingGrip said:

Wasn't it meant to be 31/01? Wonder why it's been extended.

Apologies for the link

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12993091/...


Fourth paragraph perhaps??

[LosingGrip]

Roman Moroni said:

Apologies for the link

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12993091/...


Fourth paragraph perhaps??

It was the name being released that I thought was 31/01.

[Roman Moroni]

LosingGrip said:

Roman Moroni said:

Apologies for the link

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12993091/...


Fourth paragraph perhaps??

It was the name being released that I thought was 31/01.

Indeed. Perhaps they are waiting for the outcome of the 'other' matter before a decision is made regarding the naming of the Officer? The current trial doesn't exactly portray the shooter (whoever it was ) in a good light

[freedman]

Roman Moroni said:

Indeed. Perhaps they are waiting for the outcome of the 'other' matter before a decision is made regarding the naming of the Officer? The current trial doesn't exactly portray the shooter (whoever it was ) in a good light

Has the other trial started then?

[Roman Moroni]

freedman said:

Roman Moroni said:

Indeed. Perhaps they are waiting for the outcome of the 'other' matter before a decision is made regarding the naming of the Officer? The current trial doesn't exactly portray the shooter (whoever it was ) in a good light

Has the other trial started then?

No. According to the BBC it's set to start on the 1st October this year

[CoolHands]

Roman Moroni said:

No. According to the BBC it's set to start on the 1st October this year

Good to see swift justice system in action

[Roman Moroni]

CoolHands said:

Roman Moroni said:

No. According to the BBC it's set to start on the 1st October this year

Good to see swift justice system in action

I have no dog in this fight. However, the trial for MX121 is set to start about 11 months after he was charged. This seems to be inline with most other Crown Court trials. It gives appropriate time for both the Prosecution & Defence to build up their 'briefs'

[whimsical ninja]

It's actually pretty quick for a bail case

[freedman]

Roman Moroni said:

No. According to the BBC it's set to start on the 1st October this year

That's the officers court date, no?

Not Kaba's associates

[Roman Moroni]

freedman said:

Roman Moroni said:

No. According to the BBC it's set to start on the 1st October this year

That's the officers court date, no?

Not Kaba's associates

Correct. The CK associates' trial is currently being heard at the Old Bailey (see my Daily Mail link)

[Earthdweller]

Roman Moroni said:

freedman said:

Roman Moroni said:

No. According to the BBC it's set to start on the 1st October this year

That's the officers court date, no?

Not Kaba's associates

Correct. The CK associates' trial is currently being heard at the Old Bailey (see my Daily Mail link)

That link tells all you need to know

“The man, who cannot be identified, allegedly shot and injured Brandon Malutshi at the Oval Space in Hackney, east London, on the night of August 29, 2022.”

“Jurors heard the man who allegedly shot at Mr Malutshi was not on trial because he died shortly after the events of the case.”

[Roman Moroni]

Earthdweller said:

Roman Moroni said:

freedman said:

Roman Moroni said:

No. According to the BBC it's set to start on the 1st October this year

That's the officers court date, no?

Not Kaba's associates

Correct. The CK associates' trial is currently being heard at the Old Bailey (see my Daily Mail link)

That link tells all you need to know

“The man, who cannot be identified, allegedly shot and injured Brandon Malutshi at the Oval Space in Hackney, east London, on the night of August 29, 2022.”

“Jurors heard the man who allegedly shot at Mr Malutshi was not on trial because he died shortly after the events of the case.”

Indeed, hence the reason why I posted it up

[freedman]

Two convicted, as would the other individual have been , no doubt

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68441...

[SeekerOfTruthAndPies]

freedman said:

Two convicted, as would the other individual have been , no doubt

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68441...

'Two men have been convicted over a gang shooting in an east London nightclub, allegedly carried out by another man who died before he could stand trial.

The alleged gunman cannot be identified for legal reasons.'

Is this who we think it is?

[freedman]

SeekerOfTruthAndPies said:

'Two men have been convicted over a gang shooting in an east London nightclub, allegedly carried out by another man who died before he could stand trial.

The alleged gunman cannot be identified for legal reasons.'

Is this who we think it is?

I believe so

[SeekerOfTruthAndPies]

freedman said:

SeekerOfTruthAndPies said:

'Two men have been convicted over a gang shooting in an east London nightclub, allegedly carried out by another man who died before he could stand trial.

The alleged gunman cannot be identified for legal reasons.'

Is this who we think it is?

I believe so

Certainly puts a certain slant on things, if true.

[XCP]

Why 'alleged gunman'?

If he is dead, he is not facing any allegations.

I get why he cannot be publicly named, surely just 'gunman' would be more accurate?

[98elise]

SeekerOfTruthAndPies said:

freedman said:

SeekerOfTruthAndPies said:

'Two men have been convicted over a gang shooting in an east London nightclub, allegedly carried out by another man who died before he could stand trial.

The alleged gunman cannot be identified for legal reasons.'

Is this who we think it is?

I believe so

Certainly puts a certain slant on things, if true.

In previous articles they named him. Given that the rest got found guilty it's likely CK would have been to. Obviously that was never tested in court though.