No Mask, No Entry, No Exceptions
Discussion
sevensfun said:
dave_s13 said:
Don't buy it...."face coverings" do precisely f
k all given the type, environment and methods they are worn.
I've stopped wearing one.
Careful saying that - half of the people here will wish bad things on you for this admission!k all given the type, environment and methods they are worn.I've stopped wearing one.
You're too desperate to stir people up for a reaction.
Driver101 said:
For the sake of sensible discussion moderators should be removing the trolls.
You're too desperate to stir people up for a reaction.
Have a read of some of the earlier posts before shouting ‘TROLL’. posters earlier claiming anyone not wearing a mask is an aYou're too desperate to stir people up for a reaction.
hole and didn’t believe it’s possible for someone to be exempt bad company said:
There’s something of a difference between being in an operating theatre compared to a shop. The surgical staff were wearing masks before Covid and will continue to do so after.
What makes them better in an operating theatre?Edited by Alucidnation on Sunday 6th June 19:11
sevensfun said:
monthou said:
Not true. Not that you'll care.
It’s completely true. Was posted earlier. Don’t believe it if you don’t want to.monthou said:
I think you're right in that entitled aholes writing compo letters to businesses will stop businesses enforcing no-mask policies.
Where we differ is that you see it as a good thing.
The only person I know who makes a point of not wearing a mask in shops / on the train wears one all day at work. What would you call someone like that?holes writing compo letters to businesses will stop businesses enforcing no-mask policies.Where we differ is that you see it as a good thing.
bad company said:
Driver101 said:
For the sake of sensible discussion moderators should be removing the trolls.
You're too desperate to stir people up for a reaction.
By troll you seem to mean anyone who disagrees with you.You're too desperate to stir people up for a reaction.
Back to this discussion. I'm interested in your logic.
Driver101 said:
bad company said:
Driver101 said:
It's a ridiculous statement. The next bit is also lacking common sense.
You don't see any difference in walking around a restaurant coming face to face with strangers, or sitting at a table with your partner, friend or family?
Difference yes, danger or logical, no.You don't see any difference in walking around a restaurant coming face to face with strangers, or sitting at a table with your partner, friend or family?
sevensfun said:
Chris32345 said:
Costco had this restriction for quite a while mask or face visor required
And it really isn't discimantory there very few people who can't genuinely wear one other then those who just don't want to the real reason for most people
Of course it is discriminatory to the people who genuinely are except: asthma, anxiety or whatever other reason which is none of your business And it really isn't discimantory there very few people who can't genuinely wear one other then those who just don't want to the real reason for most people
sevensfun said:
ATG said:
You keep spouting "none of your business", but the reality is that when your health condition affects other people then it becomes their business.
How does it if they're vaccinated and wearing masks?Mask use is advised to protect others, not the wearer.
How on earth can anyone be unaware of that by this point?
ATG said:
You keep spouting "none of your business", but the reality is that when your health condition affects other people then it becomes their business.
This is one that of the classic moral dilemmas, it really isn't as clear cut as you suggest.Should everyone HIV positive wear a badge in case first aider needs to treat them? Currently, we say no, they don't, and expect the first aider to take precautions and protect themselves. Just as a random example.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff