Scammed in N. Wales!

[8Pack]

puggit said:

8Pack said: Will all those that are opposed to the EU please note, on this they're fighting your corner. On this the ECHR is likely to find in your favour........eventually. The ECHR and the EU are very different and seperate bodies. Do not confuse them, and do not vote for the EU. We are a signatory to the ECHR but a member (spit) of the EU.

I stand corrected!

[supraman2954]

NiceCupOfTea said:

Caught by a van on his motorbike, 35 in a 30 just before an NSL, well out of village. Perfect conditions. Thing is, he saw the van and was sure he was within the limit. What can he do? He wants to request the photos …….

Correct me if I’m wrong, but should there be video evidence in the case of a talivan, not photos?

NiceCupOfTea said:

……..to confirm there was no targetting error………

You can't see the laser in the video (trust me, I got this info from someone who really does know), hence you can’t easily claim a targeting error, but you probably could argue for a sweep error if the video is shaky.
What should happen at the start of every video sequence is the operator aligning the crosshairs to the laser. This rarely happens but it should!!! Its a two min procedure max & it should be seen at the start of the video evidence. Otherwise the video device could be looking at the car but the laser is looking elsewhere (thanks Declan)

NiceCupOfTea said:

- to be caught at 35 he would have to have had an indicated 38 or so on the speedo which he is sure he didn't.

Don’t assume that his speedo over-reads, it might be bang on (it might even read slow if it’s old).