Kent & Medway Safety Cameras coming to my IAM...

Kent & Medway Safety Cameras coming to my IAM...

Author
Discussion

james_j

3,996 posts

257 months

Saturday 18th June 2005
quotequote all
You'll probably get a lot of inspiration as to suitable questions from: www.safespeed.org.uk/

Pies

13,116 posts

258 months

Saturday 18th June 2005
quotequote all
Why do you work for a scamera partnership?

autismuk

1,529 posts

242 months

Saturday 18th June 2005
quotequote all
Has your mum found out which of the rugby team was the father yet ?

cortinaman

3,230 posts

255 months

Saturday 18th June 2005
quotequote all
when you got this job did you go home and say to your father "NO!...NO OLD MAN.....THIS IS SOMETHING I JUST HAVE TO DO FOR THE GOOD OF ALL MANKIND!"....and ask them to answer truthfully.

mcflurry

9,104 posts

255 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
To be fair the Kent scammeras are a lot fairer than some of the others.

They don't hide around corners, sit on single carriageways with 2 lanes (a la A303) etc as "there is plenty of work for us to do without resorting to underhand methods.

There were some errors on their www. Highlighted them to Rachel Moon at a similar meeting and they were changed within about a week.


leosayer

7,325 posts

246 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
Why do they call themselves safety camera partnership when all they detect is people breaking the speed limit.

Twincam16

27,646 posts

260 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
Ask them this:

Whichever statistics you use, excessive/inappropriate speed is only a factor in a MINORITY of cases. We know it's under 10%, but even if it's 1/3 like they say, it still leaves a massive 2/3 that aren't excessive/inappropriate speed related.

Therefore, at the very least, 'speed' did not 'kill' 2/3.

Ask them, therefore, what did kill the 2/3, and what they're doing about it. Or are they letting the majority causes of road accidents and deaths slip by in favour of making money out of a minority of them.

I mean, instead of speed cameras, why can't we have tailgating cameras, lane-weaving cameras, wrong-way-up-one-way-street cameras, overtaking-on-the-inside cameras, middle-lane-moron cameras and so on?

docjan

140 posts

234 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
Over taking on the inside cameras would be getting the wrong people, before that you'd need right lane hogger cameras.

medicineman

1,729 posts

239 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
Keep calling them speed cameras.

havoc

30,279 posts

237 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
Quinny said:
Ask them why the punishment is different dependant on whether you pay up straight away, or you decide to go to court.

After all the offence is just the same so, why should somone have to risk a heavier fine and more points just because they would like to have a proper hearing rather than just accepting they are guilty.

Andy.


Spot on that man.

MMC

341 posts

271 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
Ask them why they use non-speed related accidents to "justify" scumeras. And ask them how they interpret the camera guidelines that allow a scumera to be placed up to 1km from an accident site - and get examples.

tonyhetherington

Original Poster:

32,091 posts

252 months

Tuesday 21st June 2005
quotequote all
Top work people, a couple of very good questions.

The meeting's tonight so I'll be sure to pose a couple. I don't want to get in to a statistics match with them because, simply, I don't know this topic very well at all and whether they're right or wrong (or I'm right or wrong), in a chaired environment with an audience they could very easily overcome my inferior knowledge.

But, like I say, top work people and I'll be sure to report back tomorrow!

Thanks

PS: Yeah I did look at SafeSpeed, however -as they say- a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. On this topic, that's where I stand!

Apache

39,731 posts

286 months

Tuesday 21st June 2005
quotequote all
tonyhetherington said:

PS: Yeah I did look at SafeSpeed, however -as they say- a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. On this topic, that's where I stand!


It's no surprise you are going into battle underarmed, not many of us are fortunate enough to be paid to work full time researching statistics and spin for a one sided argument.

In fact you have to wonder, with the amount spent and the numbers of Partnerships why the spin isn't a little more convincing?

jesusbuiltmycar

4,548 posts

256 months

Tuesday 21st June 2005
quotequote all
Ask them how much effort is put into pursuing motorists, whose vehicles are caught by one of their vans, but have no registered keeper???

Since this type of driver is also highly likely to be commiting more serious offences, (no insurance/tax/license etc) I would hope that they are pursued until caught, but I suspect they are just let off.......

MMC

341 posts

271 months

Tuesday 21st June 2005
quotequote all
If you're still around, Tony, there are two more I'd try:

- have you ever exceeded a speed limit? If they did not immediately declare this to the Partnership, are they not simply being hypocritical?

- comment on this: everyone speeds - no matter who. If this is the case, then the people prosecuting and trying the speeding offences are as guilty as the man in the dock (or getting the FPN). Where's the justice in that?

deeps

5,393 posts

243 months

Tuesday 21st June 2005
quotequote all
Im probably too late , so good luck tonight.
If you read this before the meeting, my suggestion would be to ask them ;

"Why do you claim to have 80% of the publics support, when independent polls consistently tell us that 80% of the general public are against you?
How do you justify this and does the same statitician compile your other statistics?"

"As you are a safety partnership, how have you made the roads safer since your formation and what were your targets on reducing fatalities as a whole throughout the county?
Have these targets been met and if not, should there be more safety cameras in operation which appear to be ineffective OR perhaps a change of direction away from cameras?
Is it conceivable that a speed camera is not as efficient as a patrolling traffic police officer in
observing and preventing all manners of dangerous driving? Shouldn't we have more police and less speed cameras?"

deltafox

3,839 posts

234 months

Tuesday 21st June 2005
quotequote all
My question would have been, "How are you gonna get outa here in one piece you slags?" While having 200 hairy assed bikers (all scammed) outside as a sending off commitee...

catso

14,806 posts

269 months

Tuesday 21st June 2005
quotequote all
MMC said:
If you're still around, Tony, there are two more I'd try:

- have you ever exceeded a speed limit? If they did not immediately declare this to the Partnership, are they not simply being hypocritical?

- comment on this: everyone speeds - no matter who. If this is the case, then the people prosecuting and trying the speeding offences are as guilty as the man in the dock (or getting the FPN). Where's the justice in that?


7db

6,058 posts

232 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2005
quotequote all
So what happened?

tonyhetherington

Original Poster:

32,091 posts

252 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2005
quotequote all

Something happened last night so I couldn't go, am SO annoyed as I was really looking forward to it. I'm going to e-mail a friend of mine now who did go who I sent some of the above questions to, to see what happened.

So sorry guys, just could not be helped.

Thanks very much for the input, though.

Tony