Rogue Clampers?

Author
Discussion

Its Just Adz

14,249 posts

211 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
We had similar recently where they threatened to clamp our car.
It will be unpaid parking fine or court fine.
Ring it and speak to the unhelpful angry man, but definitely don't ignore it.

martinbiz

3,182 posts

147 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
Responder.First said:
martinbiz said:
Where does it mention that it's anything to do with the council?
It can't due to GDPR but the Marston are a known bailiffs who work primarily for local authorities, this will almost certainly be a parking or other council fine.

There are very few instances when a car can be clamped now otherwise.
GDPR??? They work for the courts not the council, yes it could have originated as an unpaid council fine or then again a 101 other things

BertBert

19,132 posts

213 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
It's curious that they can immobilise the car not knowing who owns it, just who the RK is.

Tommo87

4,220 posts

115 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
BertBert said:
It's curious that they can immobilise the car not knowing who owns it, just who the RK is.
Presumably, that’s why they leave a number to call, - so they can unclamp it if required.

The_Nugget

654 posts

59 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
Just go and watch a few episodes of “Can’t pay, we’ll take it away” - you’ll soon get the gist of how it works.

BertBert

19,132 posts

213 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
Tommo87 said:
BertBert said:
It's curious that they can immobilise the car not knowing who owns it, just who the RK is.
Presumably, that’s why they leave a number to call, - so they can unclamp it if required.
Yes indeed. What controls are there about what they can take and what they can't for the payment of a debt. Could they take my wife's car? My daughter's car at my property? The same at another property? What regs control their behaviour? Just curious as I have no idea!

shalmaneser

Original Poster:

5,942 posts

197 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
Just to tie this up - apparently a congestion charge contravention. However notices were sent to our old address...

Going to appeal, lets see how it goes.

Boooo

Its Just Adz

14,249 posts

211 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
shalmaneser said:
Just to tie this up - apparently a congestion charge contravention. However notices were sent to our old address...

Going to appeal, lets see how it goes.

Boooo
Best of luck.

Are the clampers willing to wait for appeal process?

Bill

53,050 posts

257 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
And what did they say about the removal of the clamp?

ingenieur

4,097 posts

183 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
Can you say there is always tons of congestion so the charge is unjust?

shalmaneser

Original Poster:

5,942 posts

197 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
Bill said:
And what did they say about the removal of the clamp?
Apparently it's paused when the appeal starts. Don't know what that means to the clamping guy though...

Wackywoo105

355 posts

92 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
Don't you need to get the original judgement set aside, or is this automatically done when you appeal?

KungFuPanda

4,340 posts

172 months

Wednesday 28th February
quotequote all
Did you change your address on the V5 before the congestion charge was incurred?