Caught with no insurance after midnight expiry
Discussion
Lord Marylebone said:
Clearly the police saw a young looking lad driving along in a car after midnight and thought they would have a quick look, ANPR or a manual reg check immediately showed no insurance, and here we are.
Do they do that? Imagine if you replaced “young looking lad” with “black person”. I thought age and sex were protected characteristics too.roadsmash said:
Only on PH would you find so many people who can’t tell the time.
Midnight on Saturday is 00:00... how do people not know this? No one seems to get confused on New Year’s Eve so why is this any different?
At sea we use 2359 and 0001 for just this reason. Nothing is ever written down as 0000.Midnight on Saturday is 00:00... how do people not know this? No one seems to get confused on New Year’s Eve so why is this any different?
Algarve said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
I'm always amazed people leave stuff this important to chance, relying on a reminder from a third party. My insurance/tax/mot dates are in my phone calendar, on my old skool calendar in the kitchen, and in my wife's phone.
You work in insurance though don't you?My dogs microchips are all correct, they're all wearing engraved collars and their vaccines are up to date. Given I work in a dog shelter I can at least manage to get that right. I've no idea when my insurance expires though
Edited by Stick Legs on Monday 21st September 18:49
Bennet said:
I don't undertstand how retrospective "back dated" cover could be a real thing. Otherwise, just call a short term insurer and ask for back dated cover for that day. Since there were no crashes, presumably they'll happily take his money.
If he was a high net worth client spending £10K+ a year with a broker they may knock up a cover note for good will.The OP's mate's son has no chance.
V8 Stang said:
Bennet said:
I don't undertstand how retrospective "back dated" cover could be a real thing. Otherwise, just call a short term insurer and ask for back dated cover for that day. Since there were no crashes, presumably they'll happily take his money.
If he was a high net worth client spending £10K+ a year with a broker they may knock up a cover note for good will.The OP's mate's son has no chance.
roadsmash said:
No one seems to get confused on New Year’s Eve so why is this any different?
.
Not quite sure you analogy works..
People go out on new years eve and go home on new years day.
Somewhere in the middle is a midnight. I don't expect many people think about it and even less care whether the midnight is connected to the 'new years eve' or the 'new years day'.
In fact if you asked most people, who were still sober enough, I suspect most would think it was midnight of 'new years eve'. I always did!!!!!
NGee said:
roadsmash said:
No one seems to get confused on New Year’s Eve so why is this any different?
.
Not quite sure you analogy works..
People go out on new years eve and go home on new years day.
Somewhere in the middle is a midnight. I don't expect many people think about it and even less care whether the midnight is connected to the 'new years eve' or the 'new years day'.
In fact if you asked most people, who were still sober enough, I suspect most would think it was midnight of 'new years eve'. I always did!!!!!
You thought the countdown was to NYE? Think about that... does it make any sense?
You’re bringing in the new year... which is 00:00 on Jan 1st!
Edited by roadsmash on Monday 21st September 19:30
TwigtheWonderkid said:
WinstonWolf said:
I was pinged by ANPR, my insurance had lagged by a VERY large margin as I didn't get a renewal notice thanks to Covid.
I'm always amazed people leave stuff this important to chance, relying on a reminder from a third party. My insurance/tax/mot dates are in my phone calendar, on my old skool calendar in the kitchen, and in my wife's phone. roadsmash said:
I was referring to the countdown... to midnight NYD aka 00:00.
You thought the countdown was to NYE? Think about that... does it make any sense?
You’re bringing in the new year... which is 00:00 on Jan 1st!
Still doesn't work. Most people will think they get to midnight on new years eve, not new year's day to set the fireworks off. They are wrong, but I bet you a quintillion quid that's what the majority of people think.You thought the countdown was to NYE? Think about that... does it make any sense?
You’re bringing in the new year... which is 00:00 on Jan 1st!
Edited by roadsmash on Monday 21st September 19:30
BertBert said:
roadsmash said:
I was referring to the countdown... to midnight NYD aka 00:00.
You thought the countdown was to NYE? Think about that... does it make any sense?
You’re bringing in the new year... which is 00:00 on Jan 1st!
Still doesn't work. Most people will think they get to midnight on new years eve, not new year's day to set the fireworks off. They are wrong, but I bet you a quintillion quid that's what the majority of people think.You thought the countdown was to NYE? Think about that... does it make any sense?
You’re bringing in the new year... which is 00:00 on Jan 1st!
Edited by roadsmash on Monday 21st September 19:30
Durzel said:
It's illegal for an insurer to provide a backdated insurance certificate.
His previous insurer can provide a letter of indemnity to say that they would have covered TP risks at the time he was stopped. This has the effect of invalidating the "driving without insurance" charge.
Whether they will or not is a matter of debate.. they would be inclined to in the event that they made a mistake, or there is some dispute as to who did, but in the event that the policy simply ended they may decide not to. Again, it rather hinges on what was said on that phone call I think.
To be clear - the insurer providing a letter of indemnity is an extraordinary thing, it is not done as a matter of course.
I doubt they would though in this case. Isn’t the reality that they wouldn’t have covered him if he crashed at 00:05 - he expired his policy and told them not to cover him effectively from 00:00His previous insurer can provide a letter of indemnity to say that they would have covered TP risks at the time he was stopped. This has the effect of invalidating the "driving without insurance" charge.
Whether they will or not is a matter of debate.. they would be inclined to in the event that they made a mistake, or there is some dispute as to who did, but in the event that the policy simply ended they may decide not to. Again, it rather hinges on what was said on that phone call I think.
To be clear - the insurer providing a letter of indemnity is an extraordinary thing, it is not done as a matter of course.
Edited by Durzel on Monday 21st September 17:53
I suggest he sucks it up, he won’t need a car at Uni anyway.
roadsmash said:
BertBert said:
roadsmash said:
I was referring to the countdown... to midnight NYD aka 00:00.
You thought the countdown was to NYE? Think about that... does it make any sense?
You’re bringing in the new year... which is 00:00 on Jan 1st!
Still doesn't work. Most people will think they get to midnight on new years eve, not new year's day to set the fireworks off. They are wrong, but I bet you a quintillion quid that's what the majority of people think.You thought the countdown was to NYE? Think about that... does it make any sense?
You’re bringing in the new year... which is 00:00 on Jan 1st!
Edited by roadsmash on Monday 21st September 19:30
I remember this for some reason, years and years ago I read the back of one of my certificates and it stated that basic 3rd party insurance would remain in place for 7 days or it even could have been 14 days to facilitate being able to find new insurance cover after expiry of the original policy. This was of course pre internet days and you had to spend half a day in the Swinton insurance shop trying to get new cover. It seemed to be written in such a way that it was a legal requirement to offer this as well. I take it this no longer applies to the current set up.
V8 Stang said:
Bennet said:
I don't undertstand how retrospective "back dated" cover could be a real thing. Otherwise, just call a short term insurer and ask for back dated cover for that day. Since there were no crashes, presumably they'll happily take his money.
If he was a high net worth client spending £10K+ a year with a broker they may knock up a cover note for good will.No insurance broker is going to risk jail for a £10K spend (so maybe £1K commission). Utterly ridiculous.
Life was so much more simple when you could get a cover note or MOT of a bloke down the pub who had half inched a pad of them of the unattended desk of the said business. I've known people in long forgotten past that pulled out cover notes that looked like a 2 year old had crayoned them in when they had to do a producer.
Bigends said:
Officers had discretion to do nothing at the time of the stop, once he'd re-insured.
Not sure why they didnt tell him at the time they were going to report him for no Insurance at the time though - they should have made it clear to him that they intended to deal with the lack of insurance at the time of the stop
You're not sure they didn't. This is a third hand report of an encounter an 18 year old had with officers in the middle of the night.Not sure why they didnt tell him at the time they were going to report him for no Insurance at the time though - they should have made it clear to him that they intended to deal with the lack of insurance at the time of the stop
Edited by Bigends on Monday 21st September 11:08
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff