Police BMW engine issues

Author
Discussion

BossHogg

6,037 posts

179 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
We're having problems with our Volvos too, mind you, they are 2 year old with 110k miles, so they've had a lifetime of use in just 2 years.

stevemcs

8,705 posts

94 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
wiliferus said:
You’re absolutely right, but when the service intervals were less 10 odd years ago we had more cars. We literally had spares to ensure if one broke or got smashed up we could still deliver a service.

In terms of Road worthiness, the cars are over serviced. Also, and I can only speak for my force, if the car goes in for anything, let say tyres, before it is sent back out it will effectively have a MoT to check all the important bits are good.

Also I should imagine it’s a nationwide thing, all officers are duty bound to fully check their cars before every shift. Generally, in terms of roadworthy aspects the cars are very good. Sadly the internals of an engine are somewhat out of reach.

Meh, let’s just say the Volvos are in workshops a lot with dashboard lights on…
So if the Volvos are off the road more surely that negates an additional service on a bmw, we are talking what could 20 minutes work, drain the oil, measure out 6.5 ll04 swap a filter. I get it that nobody should lose there life in a car but if the bmw is the perfect tool for the job and all it needs is an additional oil change to reduce the risk then surely that’s the way to go.

It really should be the drivers dictating what they want and not accounts and people who have no clue.

carreauchompeur

17,857 posts

205 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
It’s a shame, as the 530d’s were literally the best tool for the job. I feel like we have finally almost got back there with the latest batch of Audi A6 3.0TDis, although how long they will last is up for debate. So much( better than the Volvos so will get used 24/7!

One or two of the V90s are up to 80k now and are feeling ragged. Doesn’t bode well!

P0PC0RN

152 posts

114 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
We have a majority Volvo fleet and they are truely woeful....

Cops fighting for the keys for the tired 150k+ 530d's over a newish Volvo says it all really!

The newest arrivals have slightly better gearbox software but that's like saying Stalin was a slightly nicer bloke than Hitler

The sooner someone realises that you can't expect a normal family car to take 600+ miles of absolute trashing a day and still be reliable the better.

I wouldn't even own a Volvo myself now - unreliable, complicated and overpriced. I would rather buy a used BMW than a new Volvo....


carreauchompeur

17,857 posts

205 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
Fully agree!

There’s a now sadly retired plain Firearms X5, and a marked Traffic X5 with virtually no kit. Both on nearly 200k. Utterly brilliant, responsive and the presence to move traffic and do good TPAC. Would take either out in a heartbeat over a new XC90.

Definitely wouldn’t buy a new Volvo. Used to quite fancy a Polestar, but no.

stevemcs

8,705 posts

94 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
Given the issues with the N57, if given the option would you have them back on the fleet.

carreauchompeur

17,857 posts

205 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
Nope, it’s an unacceptable risk, and the 5k service mileage is a pain.

Turbodiesels though? Yes absolutely. They cope with our needs better.

helix402

7,892 posts

183 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
carreauchompeur said:
Nope, it’s an unacceptable risk, and the 5k service mileage is a pain.

Turbodiesels though? Yes absolutely. They cope with our needs better.
It’s sad that once the M57 ended it appears the accountants overruled the engineers.

davebem

746 posts

178 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
Perhaps uk police should ask the Italians/Carabinieri if they are happy with their Alfa Giulias?

siremoon

203 posts

100 months

Sunday 30th July 2023
quotequote all
BossHogg said:
We're having problems with our Volvos too, mind you, they are 2 year old with 110k miles, so they've had a lifetime of use in just 2 years.
I was waiting for this. Leaving aside the BMW engine failure modes and consequences, I had been pondering whether the assessment of the BMW fleet was being done against an unobtainable standard and whether the availability for service and service life of the replacements would prove to be worse. If it does (as I anticipate) then the costs inherent in those replacements will ultimately be higher. It is entirely possible that history will show a lower overall cost, or at least no greater cost (and avoidance of the failures and their consequences) could have been achieved by working the BMW fleet less hard and having bigger fleets. Of course we'll never know because nobody will want to admit that the management of the BMW fleet could have been done differently.

nordboy

1,510 posts

51 months

Sunday 30th July 2023
quotequote all
siremoon said:
BossHogg said:
We're having problems with our Volvos too, mind you, they are 2 year old with 110k miles, so they've had a lifetime of use in just 2 years.
I was waiting for this. Leaving aside the BMW engine failure modes and consequences, I had been pondering whether the assessment of the BMW fleet was being done against an unobtainable standard and whether the availability for service and service life of the replacements would prove to be worse. If it does (as I anticipate) then the costs inherent in those replacements will ultimately be higher. It is entirely possible that history will show a lower overall cost, or at least no greater cost (and avoidance of the failures and their consequences) could have been achieved by working the BMW fleet less hard and having bigger fleets. Of course we'll never know because nobody will want to admit that the management of the BMW fleet could have been done differently.
When we last tried to move to Volvo in 2010'ish we bought a load of V70 D5's, because the initial cost price was lower. Over the course of their working life they cost 75% more than the BMW including the selling price, so we very quickly ended up back with BMW.

Our expanding fleet of new T5's are going through discs and pads in less than 3000 miles!! And the XC90's seem to be off the road more than they're on it. They're much better than the old D5's but not a patch on the BMW's (3 series in our case).

Maybe if the management of the contract was better on both sides, we'd still be running BMW's. If this issue does get sorted out, I do wonder if BMW will re-enter the police market again?

stewilko

24 posts

52 months

Sunday 30th July 2023
quotequote all
I have a 2012 BMW x35d, with the N57 twin turbo. I just serviced it yesterday (110,000 miles) which will be it's 8th oil change. The car's been through the dealer twice for EGR recall work, and I recently replaced the four turbo control pressure converters / switches to fix a boost issue.

It's all pretty solid, and is still an excellent drive, with more than enough omph. Is there anything else I should be doing to prevent the engine grenading itself? I'd quite like to keep it for a few more years.


nordboy

1,510 posts

51 months

Sunday 30th July 2023
quotequote all
stewilko said:
I have a 2012 BMW x35d, with the N57 twin turbo. I just serviced it yesterday (110,000 miles) which will be it's 8th oil change. The car's been through the dealer twice for EGR recall work, and I recently replaced the four turbo control pressure converters / switches to fix a boost issue.

It's all pretty solid, and is still an excellent drive, with more than enough omph. Is there anything else I should be doing to prevent the engine grenading itself? I'd quite like to keep it for a few more years.
You won't put yours under the same stresses as the police do, long periods of time idling, and getting generally thrashed about. But the key seems to be regular servicing/ fluid changes.

I honestly wouldn't worry too much, they're generally brilliant cars/ engines.

BlindedByTheLights

1,281 posts

98 months

Sunday 30th July 2023
quotequote all
blueST said:
BlindedByTheLights said:
blueST said:
BlindedByTheLights said:
pocketspring said:
Does anyone know if HSE are involved with this? Employers duty of care etc?
HSE have said it’s out of their remit, not sure I agree with that though. The Office for Rail and Road Regulation could get involved on the vehicle front, they’ve recently prosecuted a company for not managing driving fatigue, but again no agency seems to want to claim responsibility with this issue.

https://www.orr.gov.uk/search-news/contractor-reno...
ORR would have nothing to do with this they are an industry regulator. The reason they were involved in the one you linked is because the folk that died were working the rail industry.
I agree and it should be with the HSE under Health and Safety At Work Act, but it is falling between agencies with none taking responsibility.
It would seem to it should fall inder PUWER with, as you say, HSE taking an interest.
The problem is that PUWER doesn’t apply when the vehicle is used on public highway as the Road Traffic Act then takes precedence, Road Traffic Act is policed by the……police. Spot the problem. HSE could I believe follow up with Health and Safety at Work Act General Duties of employers, but again the problem comes when a fire incident doesn’t happen at a place of work and it happens out on the public highway involving a vehicle outwith the regs that HSE cover. A possible way it could come about with HSE involved is if one were to catch fire at a police station and people are injured or killed as that would be a workplace and technically PUWER would apply. They could get a Crown Censure as government body.

Tom4398cc

262 posts

35 months

Sunday 30th July 2023
quotequote all
stewilko said:
I have a 2012 BMW x35d, with the N57 twin turbo. I just serviced it yesterday (110,000 miles) which will be it's 8th oil change. The car's been through the dealer twice for EGR recall work, and I recently replaced the four turbo control pressure converters / switches to fix a boost issue.

It's all pretty solid, and is still an excellent drive, with more than enough omph. Is there anything else I should be doing to prevent the engine grenading itself? I'd quite like to keep it for a few more years.
My 2009 BMW 3.0 twin turbo suffered timing chain guide / timing chain failure 1 week out or warranty. BMW didn’t want to know.

If the garage / your mechanic has a boroscope, perhaps get them to have a look at the plastic chain guides to check no bits have cracked and fallen off, waiting to jam the chain.

seabod91

608 posts

63 months

Sunday 30th July 2023
quotequote all
https://news.sky.com/story/vicky-pattison-left-sha...

No say on car or model. But judging by the pictures it’s a good guess.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 30th July 2023
quotequote all
seabod91 said:
https://news.sky.com/story/vicky-pattison-left-sha...

No say on car or model. But judging by the pictures it’s a good guess.
To be fair, if I knew I was going to Chigwell, I'd burst into flames as well.

stevemcs

8,705 posts

94 months

Sunday 30th July 2023
quotequote all
seabod91 said:
https://news.sky.com/story/vicky-pattison-left-sha...

No say on car or model. But judging by the pictures it’s a good guess.
Looks like a G series 5 series so doubt it has the same issues,

dhutch

14,399 posts

198 months

Sunday 30th July 2023
quotequote all
stevemcs said:
seabod91 said:
https://news.sky.com/story/vicky-pattison-left-sha...

No say on car or model. But judging by the pictures it’s a good guess.
Looks like a G series 5 series so doubt it has the same issues,
And you can imagine an Uber car also ends up doing a lot of idling, a lot of miles generally, and potentially also gets a thrashing.

dhutch

14,399 posts

198 months

Sunday 30th July 2023
quotequote all
BlindedByTheLights said:
blueST said:
BlindedByTheLights said:
blueST said:
BlindedByTheLights said:
pocketspring said:
Does anyone know if HSE are involved with this? Employers duty of care etc?
HSE have said it’s out of their remit, not sure I agree with that though. The Office for Rail and Road Regulation could get involved on the vehicle front, they’ve recently prosecuted a company for not managing driving fatigue, but again no agency seems to want to claim responsibility with this issue.

https://www.orr.gov.uk/search-news/contractor-reno...
ORR would have nothing to do with this they are an industry regulator. The reason they were involved in the one you linked is because the folk that died were working the rail industry.
I agree and it should be with the HSE under Health and Safety At Work Act, but it is falling between agencies with none taking responsibility.
It would seem to it should fall inder PUWER with, as you say, HSE taking an interest.
The problem is that PUWER doesn’t apply when the vehicle is used on public highway as the Road Traffic Act then takes precedence, Road Traffic Act is policed by the……police. Spot the problem. HSE could I believe follow up with Health and Safety at Work Act General Duties of employers, but again the problem comes when a fire incident doesn’t happen at a place of work and it happens out on the public highway involving a vehicle outwith the regs that HSE cover. A possible way it could come about with HSE involved is if one were to catch fire at a police station and people are injured or killed as that would be a workplace and technically PUWER would apply. They could get a Crown Censure as government body.
But surely in the day and age, the police should be policing themselves as they are would anyone else. The same way the BBC reports incidents within its own organisation, etc.