Cops in Camo with radar!

Author
Discussion

puggit

Original Poster:

48,571 posts

250 months

Monday 30th May 2005
quotequote all
[pic]http://www.thenewspaper.com/rlc/pix/camo.jpg[/pic]

[url]Floriday Today|http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050514/NEWS01/505140320/1006[/url]

Hidden radar nabs speeders

SWAT training comes in handy

BY LINDA JUMP
FLORIDA TODAY

PALM BAY - A police officer in full camouflage gear lay in the brush alongside Minton Road, pointing his radar gun and relaying information on speeding vehicles to fellow officers.

Within two hours on Wednesday, the team issued 40 tickets to drivers traveling at least 15 mph above the 45 mph limit.

Using an officer in SWAT gear to catch speeders was a first for the Palm Bay Police Department.

"It was just something that we tried," said Deputy Chief Doug Muldoon, who added that the number of tickets issued that day was about the same as with a more traditional speed patrol.

Muldoon said the department didn't receive any calls from alarmed residents, who might not have realized the officer was part of a police operation.

The deputy chief said the department likely won't use a camouflaged officer again, but other, even more creative, tactics may be used.

"The next big box you see on the road may have a police officer in it," Muldoon said. "An officer could be in the back of a work truck or in construction gear."

In fact, in February, Brevard County sheriff's deputies dressed as construction workers to nab red-light runners at Wickham and Murrell roads in Viera.

A spokesman for Melbourne police, however, said that department hasn't used disguises or camouflage in traffic enforcement.

"We have plenty of opportunity to use radar without that," Sgt. Sean Riordan said.

"It doesn't really matter if drivers see us.

"People are still speeding, and by the time they see us, it's too late."

Palm Bay resident Lynnette Henry has experience with speeders in the city.

"If police have tried everything else and it hasn't worked, then they have to do what they can to slow down speeders," she said.

Balmoral Green

41,163 posts

250 months

Monday 30th May 2005
quotequote all
Hmmmm, crunchy!!!

7db

6,058 posts

232 months

Monday 30th May 2005
quotequote all
The ACPO guidelines are clear that officers using detection equipment like that should be clearly visible, out of vehicles, wearing hi-vis so as not to confuse the public that they might be pointing a weapon.

If I saw someone, not obviously law-enforcement, pointing what might be a gun at me, I'd drive faster to get away from the madman sniper, and tell the magistrate exactly that!

deltafox

3,839 posts

234 months

Monday 30th May 2005
quotequote all
I hope someone in a hummer runs the bastards down.

Camo? Whamo!!!

Jewhoo

952 posts

230 months

Monday 30th May 2005
quotequote all
Does this mean that I can have words with the local BiB who have their hairdryers out with no hi-vis jackets?

streaky

19,311 posts

251 months

Monday 30th May 2005
quotequote all
"Muldoon said the department didn't receive any calls from alarmed residents, who might not have realized the officer was part of a police operation." - well he was in cam gear, so they probably didn't see him! - Streaky

MR2Mike

20,143 posts

257 months

Monday 30th May 2005
quotequote all
Is it obligatory for US police forces to have officers called "Muldoon"?

streaky

19,311 posts

251 months

Tuesday 31st May 2005
quotequote all
MR2Mike said:
Is it obligatory for US police forces to have officers called "Muldoon"?
Yes, 73rd Amendment to the Constitution - Streaky

james_j

3,996 posts

257 months

Tuesday 31st May 2005
quotequote all
deltafox said:
I hope someone in a hummer runs the bastards down.

Camo? Whamo!!!




Perfect excuse, didn't see him, thought it was just a bit of a bump.