Further official misconduct question

Further official misconduct question

Author
Discussion

gh0st

Original Poster:

4,693 posts

260 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
Once you leave the force, are you still requested to keep quiet about how things and the law works from the "inside" or are you still obliged to keep it shut?

I imagine anyone working for the SCP's need to be kept silenced as if the public knew the sheer amount of cashflow being wasted.... :mad:

gopher

5,160 posts

261 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
Well we've had at least 2 ex CC's saying speed cams are rubbish just after retiring from a force that were using them, I just wish more of them would say something when in service!

Cheers

Paul

turbobloke

104,657 posts

262 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
gopher said:
Well we've had at least 2 ex CC's saying speed cams are rubbish just after retiring from a force that were using them, I just wish more of them would say something when in service!
Cheers
Paul
Too right, Paul Garvin and Della Cannings are merely voicing the views of many other cc's who are too busy looking over their shoulder to see the truth in front of their eyes.

julianhj

8,759 posts

264 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
You sign the Official Secrets Act on entry IIRC, so that has certain coverage, but wouldn't apply to stuff like money being wasted/poor planning and policy, I think.

streaky

19,311 posts

251 months

Sunday 31st July 2005
quotequote all
julianhj said:
You sign the Official Secrets Act on entry IIRC, so that has certain coverage, but wouldn't apply to stuff like money being wasted/poor planning and policy, I think.
But you'd be wrong to think that. Also, any confidentiality clause in your contract of employment will survive termination (of the contract, and by whatever means) ... subject to the information not being at the time in the public domain - Streaky

kevinday

11,713 posts

282 months

Sunday 31st July 2005
quotequote all
The Official Secrets Act applies to all UK citizens from the moment of birth until death, regardless of signing any piece of paper. Whatever is in your employment contract will be enforced unless deemed 'unfair' in a court of law.

Zod

35,295 posts

260 months

Sunday 31st July 2005
quotequote all
kevinday said:
The Official Secrets Act applies to all UK citizens from the moment of birth until death, regardless of signing any piece of paper. Whatever is in your employment contract will be enforced unless deemed 'unfair' in a court of law.
Section 2 only applies if you sign.

bryan35

1,906 posts

243 months

Monday 1st August 2005
quotequote all
hmm.

Where I work it's an offence to talk about the internal workings/business to anyone outside. In fact, by that argument, it's probably an offence to tell you that even!! :-)

julianhj

8,759 posts

264 months

Monday 1st August 2005
quotequote all
streaky said:

julianhj said:
You sign the Official Secrets Act on entry IIRC, so that has certain coverage, but wouldn't apply to stuff like money being wasted/poor planning and policy, I think.

But you'd be wrong to think that. Also, any confidentiality clause in your contract of employment will survive termination (of the contract, and by whatever means) ... subject to the information not being at the time in the public domain - Streaky


Is public spending deemed confidential in the case of the police service, and policy also a taboo subject? How does the freedom of information act apply here? Could it be argued that such matters where in the public interest? I can understand certain specific operational details being classified (relating to anti-terrorism, for example), and of course individual cases being off-limits until solved/closed.

streaky

19,311 posts

251 months

Monday 1st August 2005
quotequote all
bryan35 said:
hmm.

Where I work it's an offence to talk about the internal workings/business to anyone outside. In fact, by that argument, it's probably an offence to tell you that even!! :-)
It was an offence (under the 1911 Act) to inform anyone that you had signed the OSA - Streaky

lunarscope

2,895 posts

244 months

Monday 1st August 2005
quotequote all
bryan35 said:
hmm.

Where I work it's an offence to talk about the internal workings/business to anyone outside. In fact, by that argument, it's probably an offence to tell you that even!! :-)


"Indicators and warnings".

Even something as simple as an increase in the number of paperclips delivered to a government office could be an indicator of something out of the ordinary happening.
Likewise, office lights on later than normal/late night pizza deliveries, etc...

Seemingly minor indicators like these in conjunction with other 'intelligence' are very useful to the security services.

I'd better not say any more.

buckmac

15 posts

233 months

Friday 5th August 2005
quotequote all
streaky said:


bryan35 said:
hmm.

Where I work it's an offence to talk about the internal workings/business to anyone outside. In fact, by that argument, it's probably an offence to tell you that even!! :-)


It was an offence (under the 1911 Act) to inform anyone that you had signed the OSA - Streaky



OK, I'm up for it! As an ex-member of the armed services, I SIGNED THE OSA IN 1966

And what's more, I've still got the bit of paper as evidence!

Go on then - come and get me!!

>> Edited by buckmac on Friday 5th August 18:25