Is there any justificatio for "Failure To Display"

Is there any justificatio for "Failure To Display"

Author
Discussion

TVR 3X

Original Poster:

1,233 posts

269 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
In these days of SORN and ANPR where cars have to be taxed all the time and must be back-taxed to the previous tax expiry etc. is there any justification for there being an offence of "Failure to Display" a tax disk.
The people who don't want to pay tax will have untraceable cars and so if caught would face fines larger than FTD plus the back-tax. So the ones who are caught with only FTD must be overwhelmingly victims of circumstance (Tax disc nicked, changing reg. no, unable to get insurance for a couple of days).
Or am I missing something?
Russ

Yes - I am missing the "n" in justification!

>> Edited by TVR 3X on Tuesday 2nd August 12:20

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

246 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
Use to ask, never told why, when I sheeted someone for No Excise Licence, Offence report always had to have a fail to display along side it. (Invariably NFA on this).

How can you display something you do not have?. Always thought it was two bites of the cherry.

If one in force and not displayed fair enough.

Has there ever been anybody taken to Court for the offence of fail to display?. (Understand some have had FPN.)

DVD

jewhoo

952 posts

230 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
My tax disc holder fell off on one journey recently because of the hot weather. Would I have been done for failure to display?

gone

6,649 posts

265 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
jewhoo said:
My tax disc holder fell off on one journey recently because of the hot weather. Would I have been done for failure to display?


I doubt it!
Unless of course you failed the attitude test

lunarscope

2,895 posts

244 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
gone said:

jewhoo said:
My tax disc holder fell off on one journey recently because of the hot weather. Would I have been done for failure to display?



I doubt it!
Unless of course you failed the attitude test

Oh, so you do have some leaway whether to report or not ?

I thought "The law is the law" and must be obeyed.

Are you going soft ?

jewhoo

952 posts

230 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
A friend of mine was given three points for failure to display. He had a 92-reg Volvo 440, total skip, and a cold snap caused teh tax disc to fall off, coming to rest on the dash. It was still visible from the outside as it was 2 inches from the windscreen.

PC Nob walks past (who had a disagreement with my friend the week previous) and sees this. He goes home to get his digital camera, comes back, takes some pictures. Three points in the post. The local mag refused to budge on the issue, even though the tax disc was valid and the cold weather caused it to fall off (frost on windscreen) and was 2 inches from the windscreen, and clearly visible. If it's not in contact with the windscreen prepare to bend over, even if it was when you left the car.

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

246 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all

>>>>>>>A friend of mine was given three points for failure to display<<<<<<<

Be wary of your "friend" Dan for he speaketh with forked tongue.

Section 33(1) Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994
outlined the offence of failing to display.

Section 33(2) outlines the penalty which is a max fine of 200 notes NO POINTS.

DVD

jewhoo

952 posts

230 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
This may well be true DVD, but I can assure you that this is what happened, I've seen all of the necessary paperwork. He has three points on his licence for the offence of failing to display, it annoyed him rather a lot when it came to getting a quote for a new car - he couldn't afford the insurance because of the three points.

wiggy001

6,545 posts

273 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
Out of interest then, does the disc actually have to be attached to the screen (as opposed to an angled part of the dash a couple of inches from the screen?

Just wondering whether I can expect a FPN anytime soon...

jewhoo

952 posts

230 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
In this case, yes. The disc was clearly visible to the officer, but as it was not attached to the windscreen it was deemed to be incorrectly displayed.

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

246 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
J

Just done another search of my bits n'pieces and list of endorsement offence codes does not come up with anything for fail to display.

Would be interested to know the code on his Licence for the infringement you mention. Any chance?

DVD

Richard C

1,685 posts

259 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
DVD is right. The 1994 act has no provision for points. Furthermore the way the licence is top be displayed is as per SI 2002 No. 2742 ROAD TRAFFIC
The Road Vehicles (Registration and Licensing) Regulations 2002

....... the manner in which any vehicle licence or nil licence in force for a vehicle is to be fixed to and exhibited on the vehicle in accordance with the provisions of section 33(1) or (1A) of the 1994 Act, when it is used or kept on a public road, is that specified in the following provisions of this regulation.

(3) Each such licence shall be fixed to the vehicle in a holder sufficient to protect the licence from the weather to which it would otherwise be exposed.

(4) The licence shall be exhibited on the vehicle -

(c) in the case of any vehicle fitted with a glass windscreen in front of the driver extending across the vehicle to its near side, on or adjacent to the near side of the windscreen;

So if its sitting on the dash and visible then is adjacent to. Fixed is a bit more debateable - but if faced with a case contrived to catch one out - i would show that I'd fixed it by gluing it to the dash top.

I checked this out as I have a competition car where the disk is fixed to the roll cage adjacent to the near side of the windscreen;

gone

6,649 posts

265 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2005
quotequote all
lunarscope said:

Are you going soft ?


NEVER NEVER NEVER!

kitcar007kev

17 posts

231 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
the cold weather caused it to fall off (frost on windscreen) and was 2 inches from the windscreen, and clearly visible. If it's not in contact with the windscreen prepare to bend over, even if it was when you left the car.[/quote]

how does this work with a Kitcar then as my tax is fixed to the roll bar?

jewhoo

952 posts

230 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
By the sounds of it there's grounds for appeal. He was told by the police that having it on the dash isn't good enough. Maybe behind the windscreen is not seen as the same as adjacent to. I'll see if I can investigate further, but I'm away for a couple of weeks so may take a while....

Flat in Fifth

44,441 posts

253 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
Dwight VanDriver said:
Has there ever been anybody taken to Court for the offence of fail to display?. (Understand some have had FPN.)
DVD

You know that! Woe Woe and thrice Woe. My one slip! £12 Matlock mags.

Tax disc sitting on sideboard, not much use there, says he.

Yes it was a case of attitude test determining the result, PC99's attitude.

Ossifer had a thing against rally cars, took him best part of half an hour to figure out this was THE only thing he could find. My attitude was ultra polite and after parrying a few deliberate attempts to get me to give some verbals became even more quietly determined to be purrrr-fect as Wildcat says.


kenp

654 posts

250 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
Dwight VanDriver said:
Use to ask, never told why, when I sheeted someone for No Excise Licence, Offence report always had to have a fail to display along side it. (Invariably NFA on this).

How can you display something you do not have?. Always thought it was two bites of the cherry.


DVD


Surely this is an alternative charge. If you sheet (your words) somebody for not having an Excise Licence and they plead not guilty and six months later in court produce an Excise Licence for the relevant period, you have lost your opportunity of charging him with the actual offence ie FTD.
The same goes for failing to produce Driving Licence and/or MOT certificate.