101 on the M40

Author
Discussion

seandudding

Original Poster:

495 posts

251 months

Sunday 11th April 2004
quotequote all
Hi all

I got stopped on the M40 doing 101MPH. I was stopped by the BiB who were sat on a bridge with a laser.

I started to read ACPO document on Code of Practise for Road Policing. It clearly says in there that when a laser gun is used from a bridge the police officer must be stood on the bridge, and visable from a distance.

In my case there were two officers in the car, and the on eholding the gun was sat in the passenger seat and the police car was hidden behind the barrier on the bridge.

In anyones opinion is this enought to get them off my case?

Really p*sses me off, I work my ass of running 2 companies, pay my taxes on time, never had an accident. Then you see people who have no insurance or tax, drive like maniacs and get away with it.

I was just in a rush for a meeting, and get caught. This is on an empty motorway, where there was no risk to anyone else.....

Cheers

seandudding

Original Poster:

495 posts

251 months

Tuesday 13th April 2004
quotequote all
The car was sat on the bridge above the junction before the M25 heading into London.

As for been accussed of being arrogant because I supposedly have a nice car, I was in a 4 year old Audi Estate and it was Diesel. So I don't think that factors into it.

Anyone recommend a good lawyer. Last time I was up for something like this 6 years ago, I swear the lawyer made things worse for me.

I will take any penalty they give me, as I was breaking the limit. I would just like to minimize the impact as I run 2 companies and both of them require me to drive.

seandudding

Original Poster:

495 posts

251 months

Tuesday 13th April 2004
quotequote all
Walsingham

Your right the difference in time between a and b at 101 and 85 is negligable, but 85 is illegal also. But sometimes when your in a rush speeds climb up before you know it, I think most drivers have been guilty of this at some point. This time I was stupid enought to let it happen, and got caught.

As for my car been a old. As Dazren says it was designed to travel at in excess of this speed all day long.

As for putting my employees future at risk, you know nothing about me, so cannot judge on that.

I know I am guilty of this, and I will take what ever punishment is given. All I was looking of was opinions how this punishment may be reduced, which I beleive is natural, and most people in my position would do the same.

seandudding

Original Poster:

495 posts

251 months

Tuesday 13th April 2004
quotequote all
Carzee

Thanks.

I have been told by my Insurance co and a Lawyer that the ban only counts in the UK. If I go to Europe I can drive there with no issues. So I can get the other half to drive to the port, and once across the channel, I am able to drive again. Anyone know if this is the case?

seandudding

Original Poster:

495 posts

251 months

Tuesday 13th April 2004
quotequote all
Dazren...

Substitute Nurburg for Spa and you won't be far wrong on where I will be heading.

seandudding

Original Poster:

495 posts

251 months

Wednesday 19th May 2004
quotequote all
Hi Guys

Thanks guys. Still haven't heard anything on the subject.

In response to the people critisising my driving ability. I have NEVER had an accident, the car I was in was my everyday drive, some of you may know what my other cars is, and this car makes you a lot more alert. I have done many driving courses, and do more trackdays than most people. Have 10 ten already this year and have another 3 to do in the next 10 days.

Everyone who has been a passenger with me, whether on track or on the road, has felt safe, and have commented on my driving skills.

I never said I wasn't guilty of the offence. I was just looking for some advice.

Have fun, and get out there in this great weather and enjoy your cars.

Cheers Sean