Canon Lens - "normal" vs Image Stabilising
Discussion
I'm just about to purchase a 70-300mm lens for the camera (Canon 300D) before going on holiday.
I was all set to buy the Canon EF Zoom Lens - 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III - USM (and a filter) brand new from Jessops in Southend (excellent service and advice there from Nina)... but a mate of mine is selling his Canon EF Zoom Lens - 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 IS USM - the Image Stabilising jobbie (his Canon got nicked and he has bought a Nikon).
So... question is... do I buy the "normal" lens... or the year old Image Stabilising jobbie..? Is the Image Stabilising worth it...?
Thoughts..?
I was all set to buy the Canon EF Zoom Lens - 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III - USM (and a filter) brand new from Jessops in Southend (excellent service and advice there from Nina)... but a mate of mine is selling his Canon EF Zoom Lens - 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 IS USM - the Image Stabilising jobbie (his Canon got nicked and he has bought a Nikon).
So... question is... do I buy the "normal" lens... or the year old Image Stabilising jobbie..? Is the Image Stabilising worth it...?
Thoughts..?
Rude Girl said:
simpo two said:
Podie said:
his Canon got nicked and he has bought a Nikon).
Sounds like the D70 Clud (Sabotage Wing) at work
Well they didn't do a very good job then, did they Simpo? If they'd have had the lens nicked as well, it could have found its way back to Podie for a tenner!
![](http://www.pistonheads.com/include/images/scratchchin.gif)
![](http://www.pistonheads.com/include/images/hehe.gif)
Hmm... still torn as to what to do...
Seems that the IS function is a nice to have, rather than a need to have... question is, does it warrant the extra money...?
Bee Jay.. thanks for the post and the links... but some of the techno-speak stuff was a bit over my head... can I have it in "simple" please...?![](http://www.pistonheads.com/include/images/smile.gif)
![](http://www.pistonheads.com/include/images/scratchchin.gif)
Seems that the IS function is a nice to have, rather than a need to have... question is, does it warrant the extra money...?
Bee Jay.. thanks for the post and the links... but some of the techno-speak stuff was a bit over my head... can I have it in "simple" please...?
![](http://www.pistonheads.com/include/images/smile.gif)
Bee_Jay said:
Podie said:
Hmm... still torn as to what to do... ![]()
Seems that the IS function is a nice to have, rather than a need to have... question is, does it warrant the extra money...?
Bee Jay.. thanks for the post and the links... but some of the techno-speak stuff was a bit over my head... can I have it in "simple" please...?
How much extra money are we talking here?
Been offered the IS for £200...
Just been reading about the "DO" lens... wow!
Looks cool, but a bit of overkill for an enthusiastic amateur...!!
Think is Martin... how do I put this..? You're a bit good at this photo malarky... I'm just trying to move up from taking snaps to taking pictures...
Realistically I'll be taking photos of cars (moving and stationary), scenery, the odd bit of wildlife, and probably trying to catch people unaware (which I like doing!).
Really appreciate the thoughts and imput..![](http://www.pistonheads.com/include/images/smile.gif)
![](http://www.pistonheads.com/include/images/eek.gif)
V6GTO said:
I've got the 100-400L IS and believe me, the IS gets you shots you can't get otherwise.
Martin
Think is Martin... how do I put this..? You're a bit good at this photo malarky... I'm just trying to move up from taking snaps to taking pictures...
Realistically I'll be taking photos of cars (moving and stationary), scenery, the odd bit of wildlife, and probably trying to catch people unaware (which I like doing!).
Really appreciate the thoughts and imput..
![](http://www.pistonheads.com/include/images/smile.gif)
Bee_Jay said:
The 75-300 IS is the first generation IS, and is not all that good (we are now on 3rd Generation, with lenses like the 70-300 DO IS). As such it only gives you a 1-1.5 stop advantage in real life, as opposed to the 2.5 to 3 of the latest lenses.
It does however get a higher rating than the 75-300 III USM, and given the choice between the 2, I would probably buy the IS.
Ah, got my head round this now...
![](http://www.pistonheads.com/include/images/smile.gif)
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff