Digital vs Film (regarding evidence)

Digital vs Film (regarding evidence)

Author
Discussion

zetec

Original Poster:

4,478 posts

253 months

Monday 22nd December 2003
quotequote all
We all know and understand the laws regarding evidence from digital cameras.

My question is how can the powers that be tell the difference??

With my film camera I always use Boots for processing. Lately I have noticed that they will print from memory cards.

I was under the impression that the printing was the give away for digi prints but according to the sales assistant in Boots they use the same printing equipment???

How could the trained eye tell the difference??

zetec

Original Poster:

4,478 posts

253 months

Monday 22nd December 2003
quotequote all
My point is that I once read on here that digi images are inadmissable as evidence. I questioned this at Boots as they can now print from memory cards and the guy behind the counter said they used the same equipment.

As for the hill walking i did my Duke of Edinburgh award and have been all over the UK camping and hiking. I havn't been hiking for a good few years now as I have 2 young kids and it is not the sort of holiday they will enjoy.

But I will do it again when I get the chance Snowdonia and the lakes were my favourite.

>> Edited by zetec on Monday 22 December 19:58