RE: Smolenski outlines Veyron-beater

RE: Smolenski outlines Veyron-beater

Author
Discussion

Nuggs

4,640 posts

236 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
bobdylan said:
why didnt prodrive buy tvr weeping

Well given the choice between a marque which appears to have been driven into the ground over the past few years or one that's on the up and might even turn a profit...idea

markh

2,781 posts

277 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
UncleDave said:
This really is just a plaything for him isn't it..
Veyron beater.. Ha!


I hope his hand comes off the end and he gives himself a black eye!

BigGriff

2,312 posts

286 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
I've heard everything from that little T**t now.

The sooner someone removes him from the TVR equation the better.

It took VW how much money to make the Veyron? And the fact is they lose money on everyone (much like TVR then).


Ribol

11,386 posts

260 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
markh said:
UncleDave said:
This really is just a plaything for him isn't it..
Veyron beater.. Ha!


I hope his hand comes off the end and he gives himself a black eye!

Rumour has it that it would have plenty of time to stop before causing injury

CiderwithCerbie

1,420 posts

269 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
I'm shocked and appalled that you should all be subjecting the nice Mr. Smolenski to so much abuse, after he invested so much time, thought and money, well money anyway, into 'saving' TVR!

Shame on all of you..................................why did you wait until 2007?!

hehe

JonRB

74,911 posts

274 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
JR said:
Your own logic defeats you: if the "loss" is 4.2 million per car then if they sell 6x as many they will lose 6x as much.

Try to understand the extremely simple concept of fixed costs and variable costs.

If it costs you £100,000 to tool up for a product and you sell 10 of them then the tooling costs contribute £10,000 to each unit.
Sell 100,000 of them and the tooling costs contribute £1 to each unit.

rolleyes



Edited by JonRB on Tuesday 13th March 19:36

Ribol

11,386 posts

260 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
JonRB said:
JR said:
Your own logic defeats you: if the "loss" is 4.2 million per car then if they sell 6x as many they will lose 6x as much.

Try to understand the extremely simple concept of fixed costs and variable costs.

If it costs you £100,000 to tool up for a product and you sell 10 of them then the tooling costs contribute £10,000 to each unit.
Sell 100,000 of them and the tooling costs contribute £1 to each unit.

rolleyes

I always wondered why people made so many of the same thing hehe

ChrisW.

6,375 posts

257 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
Lensey said:
Welcome to the new TVR car company website





Even if Smolenski bought a Veyron a stuck the TVR decals on it --- who in their right mind would ride the thing ?

leonski

107 posts

221 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
My heart goes out to all the real TVR enthusiasts and all the hard working employees that were royally f**cked over the first time by moleskin. I can't belive he is going to add insult to injury and try and do it again with a couple of dodgy yank charvers, who, from what I can gather, are as inept as he is.

macdeb

8,531 posts

257 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
phuckin' tosser.

Esprit

6,370 posts

285 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
Mucking fuppet! :rant:

That is all

tvrs2

22 posts

237 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
vodka is no good for you nicolai !

nightflight

812 posts

219 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
Does Smellinski ever read anything posted on these forums (very cheap market research). I suspect not, or he wouldn't be wasting his time. If he did he would have got the boys to produce what we all want to buy, a ferkin' V8 roadster at a reasonable price.

s5tvr

1,239 posts

235 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
TonyHetherington said:
Is anyone else getting 'bored' of it all now?!


Very !

sleep sleep sleep

s5tvr

1,239 posts

235 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
DJc said:
So who the hell owns TVR now? What exactly has he flogged to these 2 Yanks and what on earth have they paid £10m for????



The mind boggles !

Saxon

420 posts

252 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
The man is obviously certifiably insane.

Given that TVR's problem is profitability I see little point in developing a flagship hypercar to beat the Veyron. History confirms that nobody ever makes any money on these things - Jaguar XJ220? Bugatti Veyron?? Even the McLaren F1 - undeniably the most successful ultracar of them all probably wasn't actually a profitable endeavour for McLaren. They are merely a useful tool for generating publicity for the rest of the marque. This makes some sense if like Ferrari or VW you actually produce other cars to benefit from the reflected glory - sadly TVR don't produce anything at present.

I must confess I'm also somewhat disappointed that there's nothing new here at all on the horizon - no S series or Griffith to turn things around - just the same old Sagaris and Tuscan with the same dubious powerplant that didn't sell in sufficient numbers last time.

Saxon

johnbear

1,568 posts

237 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
Is a Veyron beater really that hard to build?

Surely it all depends on NS view of 'beater'. As has been said on here many times, it's easier to build a limited run hyper car than productions runs of quality TVR's at a competitive price.

If he does manage to built a car that beats the Veyron on speed / power, it will be down to the SP12 he inherited. I bet the Veyron doesn't need plugging into the mains to warm the oil with a immersion tank heater element in the oil tank (although hats off to wheeler for a clever solution in the british tradition)

This just another PR stunt. The only PR needed is to see new TVR's rolling out of a british factory.

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

211 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
Complete and utter BS!

Do you remember just before MG Rover went belly up, how they kept promising new and sexy looking cars?

Of course none of them ever got past the artists impression stage because drawing cars is a lot cheaper and easier than actually building them.
And possibly more profitable!

What it does do is distract peoples attention away from bad news.

If NS tells TVR fans that everything is rosey and tells them what they want to hear then perhaps they will forget what a complete B'stard he has been.

DJC

23,563 posts

238 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
Terminator said:
DJc said:
There is of course the minor point that he doesnt actually *have* a Speed 12 to hand
There's a Sp12 engine in the dyno room at Bristol Avenue; at least, it was there four weeks ago..

smokin2


A full Speed 12? A genuine one? Not one of JR's development jobbies or his variable belt 6/12 cylinder hacks? Id be amazed if Smolenski even knew it was a 12 rather than an 8 or a 6 !

Im even more amazed anybody left it there!

ahonen

5,019 posts

281 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
johnbear said:
Is a Veyron beater really that hard to build?

Yes. Veyron is an utterly astonishing technical acheivement.
johnbear said:
I bet the Veyron doesn't need plugging into the mains to warm the oil with a immersion tank heater element in the oil tank (although hats off to wheeler for a clever solution in the british tradition)

That's a variation on an old F1 trick. You warm the engine so that the components expand and the tolerances are correct at start-up.