Lets see a picture of your classic(s)

Lets see a picture of your classic(s)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Sardonicus

18,999 posts

223 months

Wednesday 24th February 2016
quotequote all
codieskid said:
Here are a few pictures of my 1967 Series 1 Jaguar E-type FHC.









Trev
Not my bag confused but ..... a timeless icon stunning lines and that's a stunning example bow was in a 66 FHC often as a young boy wink


Edited by Sardonicus on Wednesday 24th February 16:46

bertie

8,550 posts

286 months

Wednesday 24th February 2016
quotequote all
codieskid said:
Here are a few pictures of my 1967 Series 1 Jaguar E-type FHC.









Trev
Winner!

Kevbo49

12 posts

100 months

Wednesday 24th February 2016
quotequote all
v8250 said:
Far rarer than you'd think. In Zagato form the UK, 250-300 cars, possibly less? Does anyone know? Came very close to buying a super Zagato last year, orange with a black vinyl roof...these are one of those 'pretty' cars that causes the proverbial itch. OP, that's a great looking Fulvia you have there...always thought the Zagato was screaming out for a bigger and higher output engine.
Hi All, I've not had the car long, about 6 months. It's only had 3 owners but been off the road since '95. It's been recommissioned by a local specialist prior to me buying it. It's a nice driving car as they say, but needs some cosmetic work. The Fulvia Sport Zagato I believe was Zagato's most prolific model. Mine is an all steel Mk2 1.3 version, the first 900 or so cars were all alloy in typical Zagato fashion. The biggest engine was 1.6, but the Fulvia generally isn't about straight line speed more about being nimble with delicate handling. Great cars to drive! More info on the Sport Zagato here http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=406...

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

139 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
Strela said:
codieskid said:
Here are a few pictures of my 1967 Series 1 Jaguar E-type FHC.









Trev
Always thought these looked better than the roadsters. The clean lines of a coupe over the never quite right bulkiness of a folded up soft top. The AMV8 coupe compared to the Volante. The XJ-S coupe compared to the convertible. There are few things better than open topped motoring and I'll always have a decapotable something or other, but my Merc SL looks far better with the hard top on than with the soft top up.

I must get round to buying a V12 E-Type coupe while all those discerning buyers are creaming themselves over, er, external bonnet catches. I mean, I love a visible hinge as much as the next man, but, you know, just fk off.
There aren't many cars that look better as a convertible than coupe.

Gunk

3,302 posts

161 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
I was clearing out some old photos last night and came across these, my 1977 911 carrera 3.0.

First photo was taken almost immediately after I bought it in 1995 with ATS "Cookie Cutters" and naff "Carrera" decals



Second photo after the decals had been removed and it it was fitted with 16" Fuchs wheels off a 3.2 Speedster (I bought them NOS for peanuts from Arlington Porsche in Northampton)





Edited by Gunk on Thursday 25th February 11:27

Nik da Greek

2,503 posts

152 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
There aren't many cars that look better as a convertible than coupe.
Except, ironically, the 2+2 E-Type. Which is just plain horrid

DonkeyApple

56,370 posts

171 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
uk66fastback said:
I'll post how I want ... just don't presume ... and then take it the wrong way when I then jokingly tell you I knew ...

"Not that rare" - ffs!
Give it a rest. You should have written your first comment better.

stephen300o

15,464 posts

230 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
uk66fastback said:
eccles said:
uk66fastback said:
eccles said:
uk66fastback said:
eccles said:
uk66fastback said:
Kevbo49 said:


More info please. Looks lovely and pretty rare.
Lancia Fulvia Zagato. Not THAT rare, but hardly common either.
I know what it is! I was asking for more details of the car itself, history, condition, long in ownership etc ... And rare is all relative. When did you last see one on the road?!
Jesus! Sorry I tried to help you! Your post made it ever so clear that you knew what it was! rolleyes
You can rolleyes all you like. You just 'presumed' I didn't know what it was cos I wasn't a clever arse and didn't name it in my post. Yet I said it was pretty rare, despite according to you, not knowing what it was?!

Christ.
Or it could be taken that you didn't name it because you didn't know what it was and thought it pretty rare because you didn't know what it was!
Perhaps you should post more clearly and not get your knickers in a twist when someone tries to help you out.
I'll post how I want ... just don't presume ... and then take it the wrong way when I then jokingly tell you I knew ...

"Not that rare" - ffs!
It is very easy to misinterpret things in a short centence with no contexts, and easier still to take offence..
Looks a nice car, thought the picture is getting smaller all the time..



Edited by stephen300o on Thursday 25th February 16:24

RichB

51,920 posts

286 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
It's sad to reflect that this thread that it has descended into yet another Pistonheads internet argument. It's standard fare on GG, The Lounge and the F1 section but not here. Fact is the original post was ambiguous and it's petty to extend an argument over such an insignificant point. Now can we please get back to pictures of classic cars?

Sadly this isn't a real one! laugh


Gunk

3,302 posts

161 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
RichB said:
It's sad to reflect that this thread that it has descended into yet another Pistonheads internet argument.
Over absolutely nothing as usual! rolleyes

bertie

8,550 posts

286 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
Gunk said:
RichB said:
It's sad to reflect that this thread that it has descended into yet another Pistonheads internet argument.
Over absolutely nothing as usual! rolleyes
Maybe a new forum is required, pissing station.

Roy C

4,187 posts

286 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
RichB said:
It's sad to reflect that this thread that it has descended into yet another Pistonheads internet argument. It's standard fare on GG, The Lounge and the F1 section but not here. Fact is the original post was ambiguous and it's petty to extend an argument over such an insignificant point. Now can we please get back to pictures of classic cars?

Sadly this isn't a real one! laugh

If it was Birkin Blower No.4, you would be Ralph Lauren! biggrin

uk66fastback

16,638 posts

273 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
I've deleted some of my posts - maybe eccles can do likewise.

I've no wish to argue with anyone so all you holier than thou characters can do one. wink

TR4man

5,255 posts

176 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
RichB said:
Sadly this isn't a real one! laugh

Is that the Airfix model?

Looks superb.

RichB

51,920 posts

286 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
TR4man said:
RichB said:
Sadly this isn't a real one! laugh

Is that the Airfix model?

Looks superb.
Thanks yes, I made it about 30 years ago and only discovered it in a box last year at my mum's house. And when talking about barn finds they say how could someone put away a Bentley and forget it was there laugh

MrB.

583 posts

188 months

Sunday 28th February 2016
quotequote all
codieskid said:
Here are a few pictures of my 1967 Series 1 Jaguar E-type FHC.









Trev


It's funny, just when you think you've had enough of E-Types, someone posts this and you go all "wibble" again! Stunning car, and great photographs too! It's one of those cars that you just can't stop from drinking in the lines, and just when you think you have, you find a different angle you hadn't seen it from before.

Congratulations sir, you do have a beautiful car there.

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 28th February 2016
quotequote all
Dolly station running the other day. I drove there and back with the roof open.



rovermorris999

5,203 posts

191 months

Sunday 28th February 2016
quotequote all
That picture just reminds me how bloated modern cars look. I've had several Toldos and Dolomites over the years, you're making me twitch again.

stephen300o

15,464 posts

230 months

Sunday 28th February 2016
quotequote all
Always liked the Dolomites, my one acceptable Triumph..simple and compact.

vpr

3,730 posts

240 months

Sunday 28th February 2016
quotequote all
This arrived for me yesterday

a 66 27 Big Block. Demands serious respect on those skinny dodgy US tyres






TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED