Classics left to die/rotting pics - Vol 2

Classics left to die/rotting pics - Vol 2

Author
Discussion

tr7v8

7,214 posts

230 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
john2443 said:
NorthernSky said:
...and...any ideas on this? There are reasons why I think it's a (pre Austin) Healey, but an equal number of reasons why I think it isn't!
Early TR maybe a 2 or a slightly later one without the grille?

david.h

411 posts

250 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
Definitely TR2 starting handle bracket!

Speed 3

4,665 posts

121 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
Dapster said:


I think it's the later 350i. The Tasmin had the bigger taillights from the Capri I think.
You're right, Fuego lights on the V8 wedge range, although the MOT history on that reg is showing it as a Tasmin with DVLA.

Yertis

18,122 posts

268 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
tr7v8 said:
john2443 said:
NorthernSky said:
...and...any ideas on this? There are reasons why I think it's a (pre Austin) Healey, but an equal number of reasons why I think it isn't!
Early TR maybe a 2 or a slightly later one without the grille?
The lights are not in the right place for a TR2, and I think the rad duct is too narrow.


Skyedriver

18,011 posts

284 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
Speed 3 said:
You're right, Fuego lights on the V8 wedge range, although the MOT history on that reg is showing it as a Tasmin with DVLA.
Early cars were called Tasmin 350i IIRC

Yertis

18,122 posts

268 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
Speed 3 said:
You're right, Fuego lights on the V8 wedge range, although the MOT history on that reg is showing it as a Tasmin with DVLA.
There are probably more Fuego lights on TVRs than there are on Fuegos, nowadays.

generationx

6,910 posts

107 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
Yertis said:
tr7v8 said:
john2443 said:
NorthernSky said:
...and...any ideas on this? There are reasons why I think it's a (pre Austin) Healey, but an equal number of reasons why I think it isn't!
Early TR maybe a 2 or a slightly later one without the grille?
The lights are not in the right place for a TR2, and I think the rad duct is too narrow.
Possibly a Morgan of some kind - the flat base to the grill area plus the rest of the old British crap lying around?

Tim O

552 posts

171 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
Peugeot 304 Cabriolet. From a distance it didn’t look too bad, and would make a lovely summer toy.


Shadow R1

3,800 posts

178 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
YX51MYZ
SUBARU IMPREZA

Colour Blue
Fuel type Petrol
Date registered 15 February 2002
MOT expired on 12 February 2016
Last mot 85,873 miles

EY52VTJ
SUBARU IMPREZA

Colour Blue
Fuel type Petrol
Date registered 4 September 2002
MOT expired on 20 December 2014
Last mot 81,428 miles

uk66fastback

16,606 posts

273 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
Continuing the Mercedes theme ... no MoT since 2014.


Dapster

7,030 posts

182 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
NorthernSky said:
The reg of the Subaru closest to the camera in the first of below is EY52 VTJ...







Edited by NorthernSky on Tuesday 1st June 13:25
Do you mind if I post this with your credit on the ordinary abandoned cars thread on GG?

Tim O

552 posts

171 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
generationx said:
Yertis said:
tr7v8 said:
john2443 said:
NorthernSky said:
...and...any ideas on this? There are reasons why I think it's a (pre Austin) Healey, but an equal number of reasons why I think it isn't!
Early TR maybe a 2 or a slightly later one without the grille?
The lights are not in the right place for a TR2, and I think the rad duct is too narrow.
Possibly a Morgan of some kind - the flat base to the grill area plus the rest of the old British crap lying around?
I agree, looks like a Morgan to me.

eccles

13,747 posts

224 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
Tim O said:
generationx said:
Yertis said:
tr7v8 said:
john2443 said:
NorthernSky said:
...and...any ideas on this? There are reasons why I think it's a (pre Austin) Healey, but an equal number of reasons why I think it isn't!
Early TR maybe a 2 or a slightly later one without the grille?
The lights are not in the right place for a TR2, and I think the rad duct is too narrow.
Possibly a Morgan of some kind - the flat base to the grill area plus the rest of the old British crap lying around?
I agree, looks like a Morgan to me.
AC 2 ltr saloon? Early 50's?

john2443

6,353 posts

213 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
eccles said:
AC 2 ltr saloon? Early 50's?
Good call.

NorthernSky

991 posts

119 months

Tuesday 1st June 2021
quotequote all
Dapster said:
NorthernSky said:
The reg of the Subaru closest to the camera in the first of below is EY52 VTJ...







Edited by NorthernSky on Tuesday 1st June 13:25
Do you mind if I post this with your credit on the ordinary abandoned cars thread on GG?
Yeah, go ahead. Please send here, the link, for my laziness. Thanks.

These subaru are crossing a line now, in 2021 - as modern, and soon to be, classics, surely.

Dapster

7,030 posts

182 months

Wednesday 2nd June 2021
quotequote all
NorthernSky said:
Yeah, go ahead. Please send here, the link, for my laziness. Thanks.

These subaru are crossing a line now, in 2021 - as modern, and soon to be, classics, surely.
Cheers fella!

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

Yertis

18,122 posts

268 months

Wednesday 2nd June 2021
quotequote all
NorthernSky said:
Yeah, go ahead. Please send here, the link, for my laziness. Thanks.

These subaru are crossing a line now, in 2021 - as modern, and soon to be, classics, surely.
I think they have been more or less since they were introduced, haven't they? Not my cup of tea but lots of character and attitude in a sea of blandness. Any car you can recognise just by its sound gets my vote.

Escort3500

11,946 posts

147 months

Wednesday 2nd June 2021
quotequote all
Yertis said:
NorthernSky said:
Yeah, go ahead. Please send here, the link, for my laziness. Thanks.

These subaru are crossing a line now, in 2021 - as modern, and soon to be, classics, surely.
I think they have been more or less since they were introduced, haven't they? Not my cup of tea but lots of character and attitude in a sea of blandness. Any car you can recognise just by its sound gets my vote.
Definitely, though I’d get rid of the awful decals

cjb44

683 posts

120 months

Wednesday 2nd June 2021
quotequote all
john2443 said:
Good call.
I agree, a good shout

TriumphStag3.0V8

3,902 posts

83 months

Wednesday 2nd June 2021
quotequote all
Touring442 said:
TriumphStag3.0V8 said:
Indeed. Bonus points for identifying the one in front of it.

Will see if I can get a better picture next weekend.
190E Merc I'd say, or a W124.
I would concur, although I couldn't get any closer as there was a river between me and it. Will go back at the weekend with a better camera. There were a few other semi interesting motors knocking around.