relationship test
Discussion
Hmm... I can see one of 3 scenarios here...
1. This is a brilliant pitch by Stigmund to make the imaginary girlfriend/not girlfriend/wife/not wife but always a postie vanish from the scene in a very public fashion, possibly hoping for the sympathy vote, but expecting also the pisstaking which serves to further obscure the real facts leading up to this thread, as outlined on the postal strike thread, and Tony is also a figment of Stigmund's fevered imagination.
2. Stigmund's postie bird really did exist, and Tony actually has pulled this entire play out of the hat to steal her, in which case, Good God man!! How on Earth did you fall for this??? Presumeably the reason Stigmund couldn't put postie girl's grievances with the Royal Mail was because she was too busy being serviced by Tony to actually let him know what they were!
3. Stigmund's postie bird never did exist, other than as a figment of his imagination, but Tony is real, and has gone to all these lengths to steal said imaginary girlfriend, in which case, I'm not sure who is the most twisted person in the love triangle!
Either way, I must admit that I am struggling to summon up huge amounts of sympathy!
1. This is a brilliant pitch by Stigmund to make the imaginary girlfriend/not girlfriend/wife/not wife but always a postie vanish from the scene in a very public fashion, possibly hoping for the sympathy vote, but expecting also the pisstaking which serves to further obscure the real facts leading up to this thread, as outlined on the postal strike thread, and Tony is also a figment of Stigmund's fevered imagination.
2. Stigmund's postie bird really did exist, and Tony actually has pulled this entire play out of the hat to steal her, in which case, Good God man!! How on Earth did you fall for this??? Presumeably the reason Stigmund couldn't put postie girl's grievances with the Royal Mail was because she was too busy being serviced by Tony to actually let him know what they were!
3. Stigmund's postie bird never did exist, other than as a figment of his imagination, but Tony is real, and has gone to all these lengths to steal said imaginary girlfriend, in which case, I'm not sure who is the most twisted person in the love triangle!
Either way, I must admit that I am struggling to summon up huge amounts of sympathy!
stigmundfreud said:
It was two weeks ago now that I got talking about relationships with Tony, one of my friends from church....
I fail to see a problem here. Put your faith in your imaginary friend down the local church and 'He' will see you right, in the way of religious believers over the millenia. 'He' will sort things and make it good, and you, being the meek person here, will inherit the earth. You've never seen a disappointed christian before have you? King Herald said:
stigmundfreud said:
It was two weeks ago now that I got talking about relationships with Tony, one of my friends from church....
I fail to see a problem here. Put your faith in your imaginary friend down the local church and 'He' will see you right, in the way of religious believers over the millenia. 'He' will sort things and make it good, and you, being the meek person here, will inherit the earth. You've never seen a disappointed christian before have you? King Herald said:
stigmundfreud said:
It was two weeks ago now that I got talking about relationships with Tony, one of my friends from church....
I fail to see a problem here. Put your faith in your imaginary friend down the local church and 'He' will see you right, in the way of religious believers over the millenia. 'He' will sort things and make it good, and you, being the meek person here, will inherit the earth. You've never seen a disappointed christian before have you? Can I just get this clear?
We are considering a man who has been switched on enough to live comfortably on income from rental properties (ref Postal Strike thread) and have enough left over to have a Monaro and a Fireblade.
This man is also a practising Christian, and at the suggestion of another practising Christian (let's call him Mr X), goes on to the internet, searches for homosexual pornography, looks at it, selects some choice images and saves it to his hard drive. The purpose of this is to *test* his (also Christian and apparently blameless) girlfriend purely in order to prove an intellectual point against Mr X.
Yeah, right...
Tell you what Stigmund - I'm a Christmas, Easter and Armistice-only churchgoer, and I wouldn't do shit like that to another human being. Pull the other one.
We are considering a man who has been switched on enough to live comfortably on income from rental properties (ref Postal Strike thread) and have enough left over to have a Monaro and a Fireblade.
This man is also a practising Christian, and at the suggestion of another practising Christian (let's call him Mr X), goes on to the internet, searches for homosexual pornography, looks at it, selects some choice images and saves it to his hard drive. The purpose of this is to *test* his (also Christian and apparently blameless) girlfriend purely in order to prove an intellectual point against Mr X.
Yeah, right...
Tell you what Stigmund - I'm a Christmas, Easter and Armistice-only churchgoer, and I wouldn't do shit like that to another human being. Pull the other one.
Rude Girl said:
Can I just get this clear?
We are considering a man who has been switched on enough to live comfortably on income from rental properties (ref Postal Strike thread) and have enough left over to have a Monaro and a Fireblade.
This man is also a practising Christian, and at the suggestion of another practising Christian (let's call him Mr X), goes on to the internet, searches for homosexual pornography, looks at it, selects some choice images and saves it to his hard drive. The purpose of this is to *test* his (also Christian and apparently blameless) girlfriend purely in order to prove an intellectual point against Mr X.
Yeah, right...
Tell you what Stigmund - I'm a Christmas, Easter and Armistice-only churchgoer, and I wouldn't do shit like that to another human being. Pull the other one.
Dont mix your words girl, say what you mean We are considering a man who has been switched on enough to live comfortably on income from rental properties (ref Postal Strike thread) and have enough left over to have a Monaro and a Fireblade.
This man is also a practising Christian, and at the suggestion of another practising Christian (let's call him Mr X), goes on to the internet, searches for homosexual pornography, looks at it, selects some choice images and saves it to his hard drive. The purpose of this is to *test* his (also Christian and apparently blameless) girlfriend purely in order to prove an intellectual point against Mr X.
Yeah, right...
Tell you what Stigmund - I'm a Christmas, Easter and Armistice-only churchgoer, and I wouldn't do shit like that to another human being. Pull the other one.
Rude Girl said:
Can I just get this clear?
We are considering a man who has been switched on enough to live comfortably on income from rental properties (ref Postal Strike thread) and have enough left over to have a Monaro and a Fireblade.
This man is also a practising Christian, and at the suggestion of another practising Christian (let's call him Mr X), goes on to the internet, searches for homosexual pornography, looks at it, selects some choice images and saves it to his hard drive. The purpose of this is to *test* his (also Christian and apparently blameless) girlfriend purely in order to prove an intellectual point against Mr X.
Yeah, right...
Tell you what Stigmund - I'm a Christmas, Easter and Armistice-only churchgoer, and I wouldn't do shit like that to another human being. Pull the other one.
game, set and match We are considering a man who has been switched on enough to live comfortably on income from rental properties (ref Postal Strike thread) and have enough left over to have a Monaro and a Fireblade.
This man is also a practising Christian, and at the suggestion of another practising Christian (let's call him Mr X), goes on to the internet, searches for homosexual pornography, looks at it, selects some choice images and saves it to his hard drive. The purpose of this is to *test* his (also Christian and apparently blameless) girlfriend purely in order to prove an intellectual point against Mr X.
Yeah, right...
Tell you what Stigmund - I'm a Christmas, Easter and Armistice-only churchgoer, and I wouldn't do shit like that to another human being. Pull the other one.
Kermit power said:
King Herald said:
stigmundfreud said:
It was two weeks ago now that I got talking about relationships with Tony, one of my friends from church....
I fail to see a problem here. Put your faith in your imaginary friend down the local church and 'He' will see you right, in the way of religious believers over the millenia. 'He' will sort things and make it good, and you, being the meek person here, will inherit the earth. You've never seen a disappointed christian before have you? Or perhaps PH is the start of a newer, stronger faith?
King Herald said:
Or perhaps PH is the start of a newer, stronger faith?
Good lord man
see what I did
We all KNOW that PH is the newest, strongest faith controlled and governed by Hamsters and late shift squirrels
Our lord is known as Summerisle, his father, the holiest of holy is Sir Tedrick of Petrol
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff