Is syvecs suitable for a 4.5 Speed 6?

Is syvecs suitable for a 4.5 Speed 6?

Author
Discussion

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Thursday 15th December 2011
quotequote all
As stated in the other thread lets keep all comments in here. Car is off to Surrey rolling road today for Ryan to investigate more.

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Thursday 15th December 2011
quotequote all
It would be unfair to comment at this stage. As soon as I have answers I'll post them.

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Thursday 15th December 2011
quotequote all
T40ORA said:
Will you be with Ryan while he is performing his magic?
Depends when he can start and how long he has the car for

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
My mapping session compared to a 4.5 T350 (mines the blue line)


Here's a 4.3 mapping session.



scratchchin just hope this is a coincidence!

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Car will be on the rolling road on Tuesday.

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Is the difference between the two 4.5s the fact that your timing is currently being retarded?
That's one thing we need to find out

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Saturday 17th December 2011
quotequote all
Mattt said:
Is Power also involved out of interest? I'd imagine with the warranty etc, Dom would want to stay abreast of the situation.
No! Dom has said it's a conflick of interest, but if i want to put The MBE back in he Will map it for free.

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Sunday 18th December 2011
quotequote all
You have to look at from Dom's point of view, syvecs is in direct competitions with his new MBE with knock, it's not his interest to see syvecs work, in fact if it fails it's better for him so there's no need for him to go the extra mile which he would if it was his product.

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
Something to note is Dom still gives his warranty on his rebuilds with syvecs fitted. He doesn't have to. He could monopolize his rebuilds with his own ECU but respects Ryan and his product to still allow this not to infringe his warranty.

I have every confidence in both parties products, Power as an engine builder are well established with great results, Syvecs also as engine tuners, their products are well received and have had great results too outside of TVR too. Unfortunately this is the first time the two have been put together. I'm the experimental piggy in middle! It's already cost me over £1K to be the first to merger these products so if it all works out which I'm sure it will, anyone else who goes this route can buy me a beer smile

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
RedSpike66 said:
Looking forward to outcome from the guinea pig who puts 4.5, FFF, Syvvecs & VVT together...
That could be me in twelve months wink lets see how this merger pans out first

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I'm glad it's all worked out, big thanks has to go to Ryan for putting in the overtime. So the answer to the title of the thread is a definite yes. syvecs is doing what it should, protecting the engine if sh!t fuel is put in. And Dom has built a cracking engine.

If RG and Power will upstanding warranties if a FFF is put on a 4.5 I might be interested in going this route but can't see what would happen if a valve dropped and damaged the bottom end? Who would pay for the bottom end rebuild?

Probably best to stay clear for now.

Or should I start a new thread "Does an FFF work on a 4.5 with Syvecs" smile

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I can say that Syvecs makes the car much smother/easier start than the MBE did at cold but it didn't have a hot start mapped on the base map so was a pig to start when hot, this should be sorted now. hopefully I will drive the car before Xmas, but need someone to drive me to SSR to pick it up.

I would like to see a Tuscan S 4.5 with syvecs as I'm sure with the better exhaust some staggering numbers would surely be possible.

Edited by Getsis on Thursday 22 December 20:02

Getsis

Original Poster:

1,537 posts

218 months

Friday 6th January 2012
quotequote all
My Tamora at the moment has the small bore mid section to the back box, this is restricting flow. The Blueflame backbox is only slightly less restrictive than a standard box. When I fit the new exhaust which is the same as a Tuscan 'S' in dia. this will give a bigger HP and a very slight increase in torque. The Syvecs is helping the car run at it's maximum with what's it's got "Safely". Syvecs will retard the engine when knock is sensed through mechanical/fuel problems hence saving the engine from premature wear failure.

Also the RG cats will restrict flow some too, de-catting is needed if I want to get the full HP out of the car but I want to leave the cats in as the extra HP isn't worth the hassel of putting the cats back for the MOT for me.



Edited by Getsis on Friday 6th January 13:42


Edited by Getsis on Friday 6th January 13:53