Latest Project: Matchbox 1/32 Bf-109E-3

Latest Project: Matchbox 1/32 Bf-109E-3

Author
Discussion

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,190 posts

185 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Red Firecracker said:
I took an alternative angle on paint chips when I did this Hunter;



I painted the silver first, then top coated and whilst the top coat was dry but not fully hardened, I stuck some Scotch magic tape (the opaque sellotape with a low take glue) along the leading edges and pulled it off revealing a paint chip-esq appearance (some would say).
Nice model, and effective camo too! TBH it was more the tiny scratches on the engine bay components I was thinking of for now. For the airframe I've heard of people using your method, but also sprinkling salt (or Marmite!) onto the wetted silver, then overspraying before dissolving the salt away with water.

SlipStream77

2,153 posts

192 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Looking fantastic, inspiring stuff. thumbup

I will have an engine to do soon when I tackle my ICM Spitfire Mk. XVI.

I'm still working on the Mustang, nearly there though.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,190 posts

185 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
SlipStream77 said:
Looking fantastic, inspiring stuff. thumbup

I will have an engine to do soon when I tackle my ICM Spitfire Mk. XVI.

I'm still working on the Mustang, nearly there though.
Would be nice to see some of your models on here!

Skii

1,633 posts

192 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
That looks great Skii : what is the difference between the citadel stuff, and say, Revell Aluminium?
Probably not a lot, but in truth I haven't used humbrol for many years - however Citadel mithril silver is fantastic in my opinion,so much so that many modellers opt to spray it on natural metal finishes with suprisingly good results, plus its water based, great for chipping effects.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,190 posts

185 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Skii said:
dr_gn said:
That looks great Skii : what is the difference between the citadel stuff, and say, Revell Aluminium?
Probably not a lot, but in truth I haven't used humbrol for many years - however Citadel mithril silver is fantastic in my opinion,so much so that many modellers opt to spray it on natural metal finishes with suprisingly good results, plus its water based, great for chipping effects.
I must admit I am very, very nervous about the external weathering on this one. I've put some effort into a 'good for it's age' kit - perhaps far too much effort - and I'm dreading the final finsih. Leaving it as new isn't an option on this one either...

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,190 posts

185 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
Bit more work last night.

Started on the bulkhead - added a scratch built hydraulic tank and lines, along with an electrical box, throttle linkage and an additional engine frame member. Did a bit more to the engine too - finally fitted the bearers and routed the wiring/piping around them. Also added part of the throttle linkage:





Needs some more pipe work, a wash, dry brushing and then overall matt varnish.

Eric Mc

122,174 posts

266 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
Looking excellent.

I've a bunch of 1/72 109s to do (Academy, Revell, Airfix).

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,190 posts

185 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Looking excellent.

I've a bunch of 1/72 109s to do (Academy, Revell, Airfix).
I want to get back to 1/72 asap. Trouble is someone bought me a 1/48 Academy KV-107-II-5 "White Heron" for my birthday.

Yes...I wondered too, but apparently it's a license built Chinook. Nice enough model, will be built totally OOB, but I think it's time I chose a subject and scale for myself for a change!

perdu

4,884 posts

200 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Eric Mc said:
Looking excellent.

I've a bunch of 1/72 109s to do (Academy, Revell, Airfix).
I want to get back to 1/72 asap. Trouble is someone bought me a 1/48 Academy KV-107-II-5 "White Heron" for my birthday.

Yes...I wondered too, but apparently it's a license built Chinook. Nice enough model, will be built totally OOB, but I think it's time I chose a subject and scale for myself for a change!
I built a Boeing Sea Knight myself once, nice copter

The KV107 is not as big as the Chinook though the family resemblance is clear

The Airfix one I built made up into a very good model and I'm sure you will do it justice in 1/48

Wish I still got pressies like those smile

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,190 posts

185 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
perdu said:
dr_gn said:
Eric Mc said:
Looking excellent.

I've a bunch of 1/72 109s to do (Academy, Revell, Airfix).
I want to get back to 1/72 asap. Trouble is someone bought me a 1/48 Academy KV-107-II-5 "White Heron" for my birthday.

Yes...I wondered too, but apparently it's a license built Chinook. Nice enough model, will be built totally OOB, but I think it's time I chose a subject and scale for myself for a change!
I built a Boeing Sea Knight myself once, nice copter

The KV107 is not as big as the Chinook though the family resemblance is clear

The Airfix one I built made up into a very good model and I'm sure you will do it justice in 1/48

Wish I still got pressies like those smile
Course..it's the CH46 isn't it? Not the 47. They all look alike to me...

Eric Mc

122,174 posts

266 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
The CH-46 is smaller and shows some of its Piasecki-Vertol ancestry a bit more

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,190 posts

185 months

Wednesday 25th August 2010
quotequote all
Trying to align a collection of 8 bits of soldered together brass with 4 bits of cenented plastic that the brass wasn't designed to match up with is proving to be a jolly experience:



Especially when 3 of the bits of brass have to pivot on the other 5, by using hinge pins only 0.4mm in diameter:



In future I will stick to 1:72.
In future I will stick to 1:72.
In future I will stick to 1:72.
In future I will stick to 1:72.
In future I will stick to 1:72.
In future I will stick to 1:72.
In future I will stick to 1:72....

perdu

4,884 posts

200 months

Wednesday 25th August 2010
quotequote all
stop whinging

wink

ferrrgodssake man

it looks bloody great


and the pain is always repaid a zillion times by the satisfaction

As you know...

tremendous work going on here thanks for sharing

Bill

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,190 posts

185 months

Thursday 26th August 2010
quotequote all
perdu said:
and the pain is always repaid a zillion times by the satisfaction
Well that's what I'm hoping...but you never know do you? Especially when there's been a significant amount of scratch building. I guess it will look better all one colour!

Any tips for thinning the removable panels? I thought of chamfering the edges at a shallow angle down to 0.5mm or so, and leaving the bulk of the covers original thickness.

Cheers,


Yertis

18,111 posts

267 months

Thursday 26th August 2010
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
perdu said:
and the pain is always repaid a zillion times by the satisfaction
Well that's what I'm hoping...but you never know do you? Especially when there's been a significant amount of scratch building. I guess it will look better all one colour!

Any tips for thinning the removable panels? I thought of chamfering the edges at a shallow angle down to 0.5mm or so, and leaving the bulk of the covers original thickness.

Cheers,
OK, I did this once, it might be worth a try. Push the kit-supplied component into a big chunk of plasticine (smear with vaseline as a release so the plasticine doesn't stick) to make a female. Pour plaster of paris into the plasticine to make a male tool. Thense a hot air gun to stretch plasticard over the male tool. Cut to correct shape. Sort of backwards vac-forming. Wouldn't attempt it for any complex curves, obviously.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,190 posts

185 months

Thursday 26th August 2010
quotequote all
Yertis said:
dr_gn said:
perdu said:
and the pain is always repaid a zillion times by the satisfaction
Well that's what I'm hoping...but you never know do you? Especially when there's been a significant amount of scratch building. I guess it will look better all one colour!

Any tips for thinning the removable panels? I thought of chamfering the edges at a shallow angle down to 0.5mm or so, and leaving the bulk of the covers original thickness.

Cheers,
OK, I did this once, it might be worth a try. Push the kit-supplied component into a big chunk of plasticine (smear with vaseline as a release so the plasticine doesn't stick) to make a female. Pour plaster of paris into the plasticine to make a male tool. Thense a hot air gun to stretch plasticard over the male tool. Cut to correct shape. Sort of backwards vac-forming. Wouldn't attempt it for any complex curves, obviously.
They are pretty complicated pieces, the engine covers. It would have to be vac formed for the gun troughs. Not worth the effort in this case, but nice idea, thanks.


Nick_F

10,154 posts

247 months

Thursday 26th August 2010
quotequote all
Thin the edges back with a Dremel or similar - scale thickness everywhere is going to be a chore to do by hand.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,190 posts

185 months

Thursday 26th August 2010
quotequote all
Nick_F said:
Thin the edges back with a Dremel or similar - scale thickness everywhere is going to be a chore to do by hand.
Swiss files and sanding sticks I think. A Dremel is wayyyy too risky for that job. Things go wrong very quickly when grinding plastic at 7500rpm.

Eric Mc

122,174 posts

266 months

Thursday 26th August 2010
quotequote all
So I've found.

I love the smell of melting polystyrene in the morning.

perdu

4,884 posts

200 months

Thursday 26th August 2010
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Nick_F said:
Thin the edges back with a Dremel or similar - scale thickness everywhere is going to be a chore to do by hand.
Swiss files and sanding sticks I think. A Dremel is wayyyy too risky for that job. Things go wrong very quickly when grinding plastic at 7500rpm.
Yes this

but I found that judicious use of a number two Swann Morton works very well on panel edges like those

I saw in an earlier picture that you do have a Swann-M knife

I used mine (Original brass and the orange plastic bodied tool) almost exclusively and most of my edge "developing" was done with it

I never quite developed a love for my Exacto scalpel tool, I found it less manoueverable

Dremels? OK but a tad fierce for polystyrene

I had a little motor driven tool that worked far less angrily than a Dremel, but still would advise knife work for this task