Airfix 1/24 Spitfire Mk VB

Airfix 1/24 Spitfire Mk VB

Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

122,335 posts

267 months

Thursday 15th November 2018
quotequote all
Not sure what you are asking.

As far as I know, none of the currently flying Spitfire Vs carry those markings. The V was the most produced of all the Spitfire variants so there is a huge variety of colour schemes available to chose from.

The old (1973/74) 1/72 Airfix Vb was issued with Zumbach's markings as was the more recent 1/32 Hobby Boss Vb.






caterhamnut

Original Poster:

429 posts

205 months

Thursday 15th November 2018
quotequote all
Was asking if the plane/designation was used in the BBMF, but your wiki link confirmed that to be the case👍

Eric Mc

122,335 posts

267 months

Thursday 15th November 2018
quotequote all
I see. The BBMF aircraft go through a variety of colour schemes over the years. It looks like AB910 was painted as Zumbach's aircraft for a while.

caterhamnut

Original Poster:

429 posts

205 months

Friday 16th November 2018
quotequote all
Here are my attempts at the figure painting!!
This is obviously a new skill to learn - I'll show some of the Mossie crew here as well for comparison, as I have done them at the same time - not finished yet.



Amazing the difference in size from 1/32nd to 1/24!



1/32nd





Test fit:







I also applied some basic washes to the interior of the cockpit...








robemcdonald

8,902 posts

198 months

Friday 16th November 2018
quotequote all
It’s looking great so far. The mosquito crewman in particular.

One minor observation though. The spitfire pilot is suffering at bit from fried egg eye syndrome. I used to have the same problem with my figures, so I gave up painting the eyes at all and just used a darker tone so it looks like a shadow. Pretty much like your mossie crewman. Which despite being half the size looks better.

Please don’t take this as criticism though, this like your overs is an excellent build.

CanAm

9,375 posts

274 months

Friday 16th November 2018
quotequote all
Is it just me, or does the shadow under this guy's nose look a little like a toothbrush moustache? And with that raised arm.........

4321go

638 posts

189 months

Friday 16th November 2018
quotequote all
And the comedy goose-stepping.......

dr_gn

16,199 posts

186 months

Friday 16th November 2018
quotequote all
I think the figures would look fine with a coat of matt varnish and maybe some light/dark weathering powder very lightly brushed over to highlight the creases in the fabric. Then again they might be ok with just a matt coat, the reflections are a bit harsh as they are now IMO.

caterhamnut

Original Poster:

429 posts

205 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
Yep - the lighting for taking the pictures close highlights the shine - it is less now after some matt clear, and I do intend to add some more wash etc...

caterhamnut

Original Poster:

429 posts

205 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
I'd bought the Eduard harness set before I knew I was going to have Ginger in place, but still wanted to use at least some of it! Added the linkage I had seen in various source pics...







I had already filed off the moulded in harness, glued these on top...I'll certainly add some wash etc to these, as they are far to clean and flat!

With that - I glued the two halves together...





I can still reach what I need to reach at final touch-up stage.



Fitting the fuselage to the wings required some....thinning! Lots of lumpy, thick tooling here from this old kit...







Lots of rigging to help parts line up and set where I wanted them to!



Gluing in spacers to hold the wing skins togther...





But starting to look like a plane now...





Let the filling, sanding and cursing begin.



Although I had fitted the undercarriage, the plane will be 'flying' - so don't need this...



I decided to cut the undercarriage out, so I could fix the wheel covers neatly, and glue the wheels in evenly, without being tied to the lazily moulded undercarriage struts etc. I also added the walls to the wheel bays...









Not going to add huge detail, but did add some mesh to these visible rads...







Now it is the new-skill-to-learn of re-scribing panel lines!



...and lots of sanding.



Added a missing strut, then covered Ginger.





...so I could get some filler-primer on.



and then start filling, sanding and re-scribing all over again!






robemcdonald

8,902 posts

198 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
Cracking progress.

Looks like a fairly simple kit despite the size.

caterhamnut

Original Poster:

429 posts

205 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
In terms of number-of-parts, yes - very.
Having only really built (almost) a very new Tamiya kit (the 1/32nd Mossie) the 'fit' (or lack of) is a bit of a shock - BUT, by building a flying version, I am avoiding a lot of the difficult-to-fit bits, like engine, panels, undercarriage etc!

caterhamnut

Original Poster:

429 posts

205 months

Wednesday 28th November 2018
quotequote all
More filler - had to plug one of the pairs of gun holes, and the wing roots are a real pain on this model - each side is a different profile, and there are prominent ridges - that get sanded away as you try and fill gaps etc! Spent longer on this area than any other...







I ended up adding some very thin strips of plastic to re-define this wing root area...





The engine panels had prominent fittings in the molding, some of which got sanded off during fitting. I decided to replace these - they are more flush on most models, but are a nice bit of detail on this one - I used PE 'washers' glued on to represent these - lower profile than the ones that had been moulded on - lots of them though!
I also used a generic PE 'pulley' to replace the crude detail of what I presume is an oil filler cap or similar, situated on top of the forward fuselage.









I added the very nice extra detail set of cannon...



Now onto the painting.
On the only other plane I have made, I used oils on the top surface to simulate panel profiles, panel gaps etc and shading - on this model I decided to try the method of airbrushing black shadows BEFORE the top coat. Took a while to get the airbrush set correctly (low) and to get the steady hand required to freehand the lines, but super-accuracy is not required here...






This had the desired effect...





HOWEVER - I was not happy with the colour. I had read that sometimes the proposed colour for this top surface of the Spitfire can be a little dark, so had tried a slightly lighter colour - but was still not happy - easy to respray another slightly darker colour on top - but I had to re-spray those pesky shadow lines again!



But happier with the colour...and with my first attempt at the shading.







I then had a similar issue with the underside - the colour that was suggested seemed too close to the top grey, so I ended up doing this twice as well - the smaller XF-83 was suggested, but I ended up using XF-19 - very subtlely lighter - but I also know that when I use my oils later, it will make things slightly darker anyway...







Finally it was the time for the Dark Green (RAF) - I used my Blutack method I used on the Mossie - I like the slightly soft edge it gives. Before spraying the green I had to re-apply those shade lines again, once masked.















Pretty pleased with the final result...





...and now some airbrushed details, such as stripe and yellow around the gun ports...















I had also completed the canopy sections - I had bought some after-market masks, which seemed to work ok. There were internal and external masks - I was going to spray the internal colour the same as the light green cockpit, but pictures suggest that the canopy framework itself was actually dark grey/black. As I had already sprayed the dark green, I left the internal like this...











So now onto the decals!


robemcdonald

8,902 posts

198 months

Wednesday 28th November 2018
quotequote all
Looking good!

dr_gn

16,199 posts

186 months

Thursday 29th November 2018
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
Looking good!
+1

You can't beat de-masking spitfire camo (at least only by applying the roundels).

henryk001

590 posts

160 months

Thursday 29th November 2018
quotequote all
Admiring your model making skills here. Fabulous workmanship.

4321go

638 posts

189 months

Thursday 29th November 2018
quotequote all
The nerdier members of the parish may come along and correct me later.....

The red painted square around the gun ports wasn’t a red painted square at all. Instead, fabric was doped over the ports to improve the aerodynamics. After all, most flights didn’t result in the guns being fired. If they were fired, then of course the rounds simply went straight through the fabric. The ground personnel became well practiced in listening for the whistle that was generated by the holes post-combat. Perhaps you could more accurately portray this with microfibre lens cloth or similar, glued over the ports and painted? Holed or not as per your own choice....

dr_gn

16,199 posts

186 months

Thursday 29th November 2018
quotequote all
4321go said:
The nerdier members of the parish may come along and correct me later.....

The red painted square around the gun ports wasn’t a red painted square at all. Instead, fabric was doped over the ports to improve the aerodynamics. After all, most flights didn’t result in the guns being fired. If they were fired, then of course the rounds simply went straight through the fabric. The ground personnel became well practiced in listening for the whistle that was generated by the holes post-combat. Perhaps you could more accurately portray this with microfibre lens cloth or similar, glued over the ports and painted? Holed or not as per your own choice....
I use spare red decal paper cut from an old roundel applied over the hole. If you use microsol it forms dimples over the port holes and looks very much like real fabric.

caterhamnut

Original Poster:

429 posts

205 months

Thursday 29th November 2018
quotequote all
Yep - I know exactly what you mean - you can often see the frayed fabric in films etc - sounds like a nice bit of detail to add - particularly at this larger scale...

Had a minor potential disaster (and got away with it) where I had been using Tamiya airbrush cleaner (from Belgium!) and had a bit on a piece of kitchen roll, which I then rested the model on - luckily it was only on a one-colour section - so a quick gentle re-spray of the area worked - few!! I obviously had not learnt my lesson - when I was making the Brabham BT52 I managed to wipe the freshly dried blue Zero paint with a similar rag, and cause much more damage - perils of working on a small, temporary space -

arrrgh!!







Ginger had survived all the manhandling...



...and the canopy is going to fit!





...so on to the decals. Really comes alive now - I had sprayed a semi-gloss clear to protect the paint and help the decals, so everything looks very shiny right now...



















So, now onto the hard bit - adding a bit of weathering and detail!

Quick question for Spitfire nerds - rear wheel - up or down? You see both in pictures....



dr_gn

16,199 posts

186 months

Thursday 29th November 2018
quotequote all
The tail wheel wasn’t retractable on that version.