CSL Vs 911 Turbo...
Discussion
The Dude said:
klm said:
Beemer-5 said:
klm said:
my mate had a car messed about with and said yeah it's alot quicker, untill he put it on the rollers, boy did he get a shock.
It was worse than official figures.
Just take the bhp gains claim with a pinch of salt.
As I said before, my mate Csl has got the full Supersprint system with race kats
It was worse than official figures.
Just take the bhp gains claim with a pinch of salt.
As I said before, my mate Csl has got the full Supersprint system with race kats
Hmmmmmmmmm............
Yes, my mate had "a car" messed about with
And my other mate had a full SuperSprint on his "Csl"
Can't see where I said the "Csl" has been tuned
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM god you get some Divs on these forums, really sad that they read something that is not there, try getting out more, maybe to buy a new anorak
In Beemer-5's defence, it seemed to me like you said your mate's car that had been messed with was a CSL - "as I said earlier" seemed in reference to the messed about with car.
Don't think there's much need to refer to people as "divs" though mate, chill out a bit.
![beer](/inc/images/beer.gif)
Dude, the bloke obviously uses the forum to make up for other inadequacies. He is an argumentative twit who needs to chill out, as you rightly say.
rassi said:
Have a look at www.track-challenge.com and do a comparision between the CSL and 911 TT.
CSL // 911 TT
0 - 40 Km/h 1,4 s // 1,2 s
0 - 60 Km/h 2,2 s // 1,9 s
0 - 80 Km/h 3,6 s // 3,2 s
0 - 100 Km/h 4,8 s // 4,2 s
0 - 120 Km/h 6,8 s // 5,9 s
0 - 140 Km/h 8,6 s // 7,4 s
0 - 160 Km/h 10,8 s // 9,4 s
0 - 180 Km/h 14,2 s // 11,9 s
0 - 200 Km/h 16,7 s // 14,6 s
and
Elasticity (4./5./6.)
CSL // 911 TT
80 - 100 Km/h 2,7 s / 3,5 s / 4,1 s // 1,7 s / 2,4 s / 3,4 s
80 - 120 Km/h 5,1 s / 6,9 s / 8,7 s // 3,5 s / 4,5 s / 6,1 s
80 - 160 Km/h 10 s / 13,5 s / 18,1 s // 7,6 s / 9,2 s / 12,1 s
80 - 180 Km/h 13,2 s / 17,1 s / 23,7 s // 9,6 s / 11,7 s / 15,4 s
80 - 200 Km/h - s / - s / - s // 12,3 s / 14,6 s / 18,9 s
This looks like a pretty clear performance difference, IMHO
Edit: Sorry about the crap formatting
CSL // 911 TT
0 - 40 Km/h 1,4 s // 1,2 s
0 - 60 Km/h 2,2 s // 1,9 s
0 - 80 Km/h 3,6 s // 3,2 s
0 - 100 Km/h 4,8 s // 4,2 s
0 - 120 Km/h 6,8 s // 5,9 s
0 - 140 Km/h 8,6 s // 7,4 s
0 - 160 Km/h 10,8 s // 9,4 s
0 - 180 Km/h 14,2 s // 11,9 s
0 - 200 Km/h 16,7 s // 14,6 s
and
Elasticity (4./5./6.)
CSL // 911 TT
80 - 100 Km/h 2,7 s / 3,5 s / 4,1 s // 1,7 s / 2,4 s / 3,4 s
80 - 120 Km/h 5,1 s / 6,9 s / 8,7 s // 3,5 s / 4,5 s / 6,1 s
80 - 160 Km/h 10 s / 13,5 s / 18,1 s // 7,6 s / 9,2 s / 12,1 s
80 - 180 Km/h 13,2 s / 17,1 s / 23,7 s // 9,6 s / 11,7 s / 15,4 s
80 - 200 Km/h - s / - s / - s // 12,3 s / 14,6 s / 18,9 s
This looks like a pretty clear performance difference, IMHO
Edit: Sorry about the crap formatting
Now look at lap times and the CSL is faster, and the drivers are better looking driving gods
![](/inc/images/wink.gif)
m12_nathan said:
rassi said:
Have a look at www.track-challenge.com and do a comparision between the CSL and 911 TT.
CSL // 911 TT
0 - 40 Km/h 1,4 s // 1,2 s
0 - 60 Km/h 2,2 s // 1,9 s
0 - 80 Km/h 3,6 s // 3,2 s
0 - 100 Km/h 4,8 s // 4,2 s
0 - 120 Km/h 6,8 s // 5,9 s
0 - 140 Km/h 8,6 s // 7,4 s
0 - 160 Km/h 10,8 s // 9,4 s
0 - 180 Km/h 14,2 s // 11,9 s
0 - 200 Km/h 16,7 s // 14,6 s
and
Elasticity (4./5./6.)
CSL // 911 TT
80 - 100 Km/h 2,7 s / 3,5 s / 4,1 s // 1,7 s / 2,4 s / 3,4 s
80 - 120 Km/h 5,1 s / 6,9 s / 8,7 s // 3,5 s / 4,5 s / 6,1 s
80 - 160 Km/h 10 s / 13,5 s / 18,1 s // 7,6 s / 9,2 s / 12,1 s
80 - 180 Km/h 13,2 s / 17,1 s / 23,7 s // 9,6 s / 11,7 s / 15,4 s
80 - 200 Km/h - s / - s / - s // 12,3 s / 14,6 s / 18,9 s
This looks like a pretty clear performance difference, IMHO
Edit: Sorry about the crap formatting
CSL // 911 TT
0 - 40 Km/h 1,4 s // 1,2 s
0 - 60 Km/h 2,2 s // 1,9 s
0 - 80 Km/h 3,6 s // 3,2 s
0 - 100 Km/h 4,8 s // 4,2 s
0 - 120 Km/h 6,8 s // 5,9 s
0 - 140 Km/h 8,6 s // 7,4 s
0 - 160 Km/h 10,8 s // 9,4 s
0 - 180 Km/h 14,2 s // 11,9 s
0 - 200 Km/h 16,7 s // 14,6 s
and
Elasticity (4./5./6.)
CSL // 911 TT
80 - 100 Km/h 2,7 s / 3,5 s / 4,1 s // 1,7 s / 2,4 s / 3,4 s
80 - 120 Km/h 5,1 s / 6,9 s / 8,7 s // 3,5 s / 4,5 s / 6,1 s
80 - 160 Km/h 10 s / 13,5 s / 18,1 s // 7,6 s / 9,2 s / 12,1 s
80 - 180 Km/h 13,2 s / 17,1 s / 23,7 s // 9,6 s / 11,7 s / 15,4 s
80 - 200 Km/h - s / - s / - s // 12,3 s / 14,6 s / 18,9 s
This looks like a pretty clear performance difference, IMHO
Edit: Sorry about the crap formatting
Now look at lap times and the CSL is faster, and the drivers are better looking driving gods
![](/inc/images/wink.gif)
![](/inc/images/biggrin.gif)
But yes, the 996TT is more powerful, has 4wd and accelerates quicker. It's still a little slower round the Nordschleife and, as we all know, that is the only measure that counts.
This post contains sarcasm.
Oh dear we have some sheep on here now lol, never met so many Bitches in one place, I would like to stay and dance round your handbags girls but I got more important things to do,,,, no doubt you sado's will spend most of your sad little Christmas on here,, I'll catch up with you in the new year Girls, have a good one.
klm said:
I'll get me coat then, I can't be doing with this crap, just to settle it, yes you are the fastest girl in a Csl, even quicker than a Porsche tt, god what a hero you are!!!!!!!
So much for 'reading what was not written', klm. (As you previously put it).
Dude never said that, neither did anyone else.
In the main, forummers have given honest, sensible views about the CSL and 996tt. But of course, you see it all different.
As others have said in various ways, you are a sad, sad tool.
When you have had a personality transplant, come back and talk cars. Until then, that playgroup you are a member of will offer you all you could possibly need, pal.
Fort Jefferson said:
Why is klm/twatwatching talking to himself? It's the same bloke![confused](/inc/images/confused.gif)
![confused](/inc/images/confused.gif)
This one is class: a positive thread about a dealer and he just wades in and says their all wankers with no justification whatsoever?!
www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&t=328354&r=4370995&hm=33619#4370995
It gets better: a question about a nice car being spotted - PORSCHE CARRERA GT SPOTTED ..SHELL STATION A11
He comes in with: "yeah it was a GT, done a track day at Snetterton, way over rated in my opinion, looked a bit gay in the flesh, think there is alot better cars out there for the money."
So now, he's a homophobe too?!
A superb display of knowledge: www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&t=292902&r=3779124&hm=33619#3779124
This guy seems to drive a Porsche, but spends a lot of time browsing various discuss threads trying to antagonise people? Personally I tend to stick with events, my local region and cars I drive today or have owned in the past. I'm not interested in Mercs for example, so it's highly unlikely I'd ever look in the Merc forum - and certainly wouldn't wade in with stupid comments about people being girls because of their opinions FFS (a homophobic sexist... what a great guy he must be!)
Or alternatively KLM/TWATWATCHING is obviously a knowledgable bloke and we should all defer to his knowledge?
![confused](/inc/images/confused.gif)
(Maybe he has two personalities so he can wear trousers for one and a dress for the other?)
![biglaugh](/inc/images/biglaugh.gif)
Edited by john_r on Sunday 10th December 10:43
Gassing Station | CSL | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff