Crash at Shoreham Air show

Author
Discussion

Riley Blue

21,078 posts

228 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all

Cold

15,267 posts

92 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all

HoHoHo

15,007 posts

252 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Well we now have it confirmed the pilot fked-up and he caused the death of innocent people.

This has a long way to run yet.

Speed 3

4,661 posts

121 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Full report 450 pages. Systemic ownership and oversight failures on top of the pilot error:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/aircraft-accide...

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

249 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Cold said:
Whilst pilot error led to the crash, that it hit people going about their lives and not even perhaps aware that a pilot was making such mistakes must in part be down to the lack of planning and risk assessment.

The poor chap driving his Roller to someone's wedding day wasn't partaking in a hobby with some associated risks, for example.

Riley Blue

21,078 posts

228 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Cold said:
Much more to it than that. Aircraft operator and show organiser also accountable.

Europa1

10,923 posts

190 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
TTmonkey said:
Cold said:
Whilst pilot error led to the crash, that it hit people going about their lives and not even perhaps aware that a pilot was making such mistakes must in part be down to the lack of planning and risk assessment.

The poor chap driving his Roller to someone's wedding day wasn't partaking in a hobby with some associated risks, for example.
...which is why the BBC report linked in TTmonkey's post also talks about lack of risk assessment on the part of the show organisers.

essayer

9,113 posts

196 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Easy to point at the pilot isn't it. In reality, much more complex than that.

IanH755

1,872 posts

122 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Not really, it was the pilot who entered the loop too low and too slow. Without that happening all the other details are moot as the crash wouldn't have happened. It's only because of the crash that everything else is brought to light.

essayer

9,113 posts

196 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
IanH755 said:
Not really, it was the pilot who entered the loop too low and too slow. Without that happening all the other details are moot as the crash wouldn't have happened. It's only because of the crash that everything else is brought to light.
Yes, he might well have crashed. But not where he did.

"The severity of the outcome was due to the absence of provisions to mitigate the effects of an aircraft crashing in an area outside the control of the organisers of the flying display."

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

249 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
IanH755 said:
Not really, it was the pilot who entered the loop too low and too slow. Without that happening all the other details are moot as the crash wouldn't have happened. It's only because of the crash that everything else is brought to light.
So you'd be happy to go watch an F1 race at a track with no safety barriers, for example? Or any regard to crowd safety? Or where the organisers and the drivers cant agree whose responsible for the rules and the safety of people not involved with driving the cars?

hornetrider

63,161 posts

207 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
essayer said:
Easy to point at the pilot isn't it. In reality, much more complex than that.
In what way?

BBC said:
On publication of the report into the disaster, AAIB principal inspector Julian Firth said: "The aircraft crashed because at the top of its aerobatic manoeuvre it was too low to complete it."
There's only one person flying the plane. And he ballsed up the manoeuvre either through incompetence or grandstanding.

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

249 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
The pilot is to blame for the aircraft crashing.

However, it seems that if the organisers had properly done their jobs, or that if the authorities had properly considered the risks to the public, the aircraft crash itself might not have happened at the junction of a busy road unconnected to the airshow.

The aircraft crashed during a manoeuvre designed to entertain the paying crowd a the show. Not in some associated transit too and from the event. And yet it dropped onto the nearest major road which was full of traffic.


I think that, in hind sight at least, most people would agree that holding an airshow at Shoreham is an unwise decision. Its far too built up an area.

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

249 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
I see the pilot is claiming total loss of memory of the event.


Does anyone think he'll be charged?

hornetrider

63,161 posts

207 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Got a link moose?

pc.iow

1,879 posts

205 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
It wasn't an accident, the pilot fked up.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

263 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
There's only one person flying the plane. And he ballsed up the manoeuvre either through incompetence or grandstanding.
Or though making a mistake.

anonymous-user

56 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
There's only one person flying the plane. And he ballsed up the manoeuvre either through incompetence or grandstanding.
That's my assessment of the documents.
(Disclaimer: I'm not a pilot, but I do read a lot of accident reports and official documents, so am quite comfortable reading between the lines.)

My money is on no prosecution for the dick behind the stick, though.

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

249 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
ohhhh, charity you say... they should have mentioned that earlier, makes it all ok.

Robertj21a

16,496 posts

107 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
essayer said:
Easy to point at the pilot isn't it. In reality, much more complex than that.
Not really. It's been judged to be pilot error - so, yes, easy (and seemingly correct) to point at the pilot !