Post pictures of amazingly cool engineering
Discussion
Morningside said:
ZeeTacoe said:
Too right! Come on...More information.From the fascinating site english russia;
http://englishrussia.com/?p=2355#more-2355
There is an awful lot on that site that would fit in this thread.
More info:
Source 1: From scientific search to atomic industry : modern problems of atomic science and technology in the USSR. By: AM Petros’iants
In the Soviet Union problems are studied regarding the use of small-size nuclear power plants for remote regions—regions located far from the power supply systems. Some examples are the areas of the Far North, dense forest corners of Siberia and the Far East. In these places, Diesel-type or thermal power plants are usually erected which are fired by transported liquid or solid fuel.
There are great difficulties connected with delivery of fuel to these regions. Therefore, for these regions small nuclear power plants could be expedient even today.
In the years 1961 through 1963 two small-size nuclear power plants were constructed: the TEhS-3, with a water-cooled and water-moderated reactor, and the ARBUS nuclear power unit, with an organic-cooled and organic-moderated reactor.
TEhS-3 transportable nuclear power plant
The TEhS-3 nuclear power plant, assembled with a large unit and with a water-cooled and water-moderated reactor of 1,500-kw capacity, was put into operation in 1961 in Obninsk.
It is very important that the construction and mounting operations for the nuclear power plants intended for use in remote areas be minimum at the place of operation. In this respect the TEhS-3 plant serves as an example: it was supplied from the manufacturing plant in a state ready for operation.
Practically all the equipment of the TEhS-3 plant is completed in four large units and positioned on four self-driven caterpillar platforms with heated car-type bodies. This makes it possible to operate the TEhS-3 plant without constructing special buildings, and preparation of the construction site is reduced mainly to the arrangement of the biological shielding. The total weight of the TEhS-3 plant equipment is 210 t (Table 5-1).
The weight and dimensions of the self-driven power units faciliates transportation by rail. The operation of the TEhS-3 plant since 1961 has confirmed its reliability, good controlability and easy servicing.
At present the transportable nuclear power plant is used as a research base for creating plants of a similar type.
Table 5-1. Performance of TEhS-3 portable nuclear power plant
Thermal power: 8,800 kw
Electrical power: 1,500 kw
Thermal efficiency: 17 per cent
Coolant: Ordinary water
Coolant flow rate: 1,000 m3/hr
Coolant pressure: 130 atm
Coolant temperature at reactor inlet: 270° C
Coolant temperature at reactor outlet: 300°C
Steam parameters - pressure: 20 atm
Steam parameters - temperature: 280°C
Fuel lifetime: 250 days
Source 1: From scientific search to atomic industry : modern problems of atomic science and technology in the USSR. By: AM Petros’iants
In the Soviet Union problems are studied regarding the use of small-size nuclear power plants for remote regions—regions located far from the power supply systems. Some examples are the areas of the Far North, dense forest corners of Siberia and the Far East. In these places, Diesel-type or thermal power plants are usually erected which are fired by transported liquid or solid fuel.
There are great difficulties connected with delivery of fuel to these regions. Therefore, for these regions small nuclear power plants could be expedient even today.
In the years 1961 through 1963 two small-size nuclear power plants were constructed: the TEhS-3, with a water-cooled and water-moderated reactor, and the ARBUS nuclear power unit, with an organic-cooled and organic-moderated reactor.
TEhS-3 transportable nuclear power plant
The TEhS-3 nuclear power plant, assembled with a large unit and with a water-cooled and water-moderated reactor of 1,500-kw capacity, was put into operation in 1961 in Obninsk.
It is very important that the construction and mounting operations for the nuclear power plants intended for use in remote areas be minimum at the place of operation. In this respect the TEhS-3 plant serves as an example: it was supplied from the manufacturing plant in a state ready for operation.
Practically all the equipment of the TEhS-3 plant is completed in four large units and positioned on four self-driven caterpillar platforms with heated car-type bodies. This makes it possible to operate the TEhS-3 plant without constructing special buildings, and preparation of the construction site is reduced mainly to the arrangement of the biological shielding. The total weight of the TEhS-3 plant equipment is 210 t (Table 5-1).
The weight and dimensions of the self-driven power units faciliates transportation by rail. The operation of the TEhS-3 plant since 1961 has confirmed its reliability, good controlability and easy servicing.
At present the transportable nuclear power plant is used as a research base for creating plants of a similar type.
Table 5-1. Performance of TEhS-3 portable nuclear power plant
Thermal power: 8,800 kw
Electrical power: 1,500 kw
Thermal efficiency: 17 per cent
Coolant: Ordinary water
Coolant flow rate: 1,000 m3/hr
Coolant pressure: 130 atm
Coolant temperature at reactor inlet: 270° C
Coolant temperature at reactor outlet: 300°C
Steam parameters - pressure: 20 atm
Steam parameters - temperature: 280°C
Fuel lifetime: 250 days
carl_w said:
racer2_uk said:
Napier Lion aero engine, designed in 1917 !
![](http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i101/racer2_uk/Napierlion51383camshafttimingcheck1.jpg)
DOHC, 4 valve/cylinder, W12, 24 litre, hand swing to start
Andy
When did we decide that all the cylinders had to be encased in one big lump of metal? Early car engines had separate cylinders like the photo.![](http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i101/racer2_uk/Napierlion51383camshafttimingcheck1.jpg)
DOHC, 4 valve/cylinder, W12, 24 litre, hand swing to start
Andy
shalmaneser said:
carl_w said:
racer2_uk said:
Napier Lion aero engine, designed in 1917 !
![](http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i101/racer2_uk/Napierlion51383camshafttimingcheck1.jpg)
DOHC, 4 valve/cylinder, W12, 24 litre, hand swing to start
Andy
When did we decide that all the cylinders had to be encased in one big lump of metal? Early car engines had separate cylinders like the photo.![](http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i101/racer2_uk/Napierlion51383camshafttimingcheck1.jpg)
DOHC, 4 valve/cylinder, W12, 24 litre, hand swing to start
Andy
Further to the big ship engine posted on page 3:
Maximum power: 108,920 hp at 102 rpm
Maximum torque: 5,608,312 lb/ft at 102rpm![yikes](/inc/images/yikes.gif)
http://people.bath.ac.uk/ccsshb/12cyl/
Will it fit your engine bay?: NOT A CHANCE
Maximum power: 108,920 hp at 102 rpm
Maximum torque: 5,608,312 lb/ft at 102rpm
![yikes](/inc/images/yikes.gif)
http://people.bath.ac.uk/ccsshb/12cyl/
Will it fit your engine bay?: NOT A CHANCE
blindswelledrat said:
Vr6er said:
I know what you mean:
Mr wankel - internal combustion engines...
Mate in pub - yeah
Mr wankel - not that great are they?
Mate in Pub - what do you mean? They are the best thing since sliced bread!!
Mr wankel - (sips pint) reckon I could do better...
Glad he's not my mate. Boring fMr wankel - internal combustion engines...
Mate in pub - yeah
Mr wankel - not that great are they?
Mate in Pub - what do you mean? They are the best thing since sliced bread!!
Mr wankel - (sips pint) reckon I could do better...
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
richierich37 said:
mat205125 said:
does a ltd slip diff make both driving wheels spin at the same time or is that just a normal diff?????In some conditions, either in snowy/icy conditions or when you're racing and one wheel has almost completely broken traction, it's not what you want. Do a "limited slip" differential will only send a certain percentage of the torque to any one wheel.
The best way to imagine it is you're parked on a muddy verge. One wheel is on the tarmac.
With an open differential, it's possible to send ALL the torque to one wheel, leaving you sat stationary with one wheel spinning happily away in the mud.
With an LSD, that one wheel can only recieve *plucks number out of air* 70% of the available torque, leaving 30% to the wheel on the tarmac to pull you along.
Yoshiwaan said:
What would that engine go into? As in what particular ship(s)?
I saw a documentary on Discovery recently ('Mighty Ships' I think) and the 14 cylinder version was developed to go into the "Emma Mærsk" which is the largest ship ever built that is currently in use. She can carry something like 15,000 containers! ![eek](/inc/images/eek.gif)
frit said:
and then said:
Apologies that this a link and not a picture, but it really is (imo) worth watching... i was blown away by this piece of engineering... especially the bit on ice... scary!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww
OMG that actually made me feel quite scared, surely that cant be for real? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww
Edited by and then on Sunday 8th March 17:15
![boxedin](/inc/images/boxedin.gif)
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff