Post pictures of amazingly cool engineering

Post pictures of amazingly cool engineering

Author
Discussion

Beyond Rational

3,527 posts

217 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
Morningside said:
ZeeTacoe said:
Jonny671 said:
You can imagine it can't you laugh

Imagine Mazdas drawing board of putting it in the car too..
surely they'd only need to look at a production NSU to see how to do it?

Beyond Rational said:


Mobile nuclear power station
you can't just leave us with that one picture.
Too right! Come on...More information.
Ok, ok

From the fascinating site english russia;

http://englishrussia.com/?p=2355#more-2355

There is an awful lot on that site that would fit in this thread.

Beyond Rational

3,527 posts

217 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
More info:

Source 1: From scientific search to atomic industry : modern problems of atomic science and technology in the USSR. By: AM Petros’iants

In the Soviet Union problems are studied regarding the use of small-size nuclear power plants for remote regions—regions located far from the power supply systems. Some examples are the areas of the Far North, dense forest corners of Siberia and the Far East. In these places, Diesel-type or thermal power plants are usually erected which are fired by transported liquid or solid fuel.

There are great difficulties connected with delivery of fuel to these regions. Therefore, for these regions small nuclear power plants could be expedient even today.

In the years 1961 through 1963 two small-size nuclear power plants were constructed: the TEhS-3, with a water-cooled and water-moderated reactor, and the ARBUS nuclear power unit, with an organic-cooled and organic-moderated reactor.

TEhS-3 transportable nuclear power plant

The TEhS-3 nuclear power plant, assembled with a large unit and with a water-cooled and water-moderated reactor of 1,500-kw capacity, was put into operation in 1961 in Obninsk.

It is very important that the construction and mounting operations for the nuclear power plants intended for use in remote areas be minimum at the place of operation. In this respect the TEhS-3 plant serves as an example: it was supplied from the manufacturing plant in a state ready for operation.

Practically all the equipment of the TEhS-3 plant is completed in four large units and positioned on four self-driven caterpillar platforms with heated car-type bodies. This makes it possible to operate the TEhS-3 plant without constructing special buildings, and preparation of the construction site is reduced mainly to the arrangement of the biological shielding. The total weight of the TEhS-3 plant equipment is 210 t (Table 5-1).

The weight and dimensions of the self-driven power units faciliates transportation by rail. The operation of the TEhS-3 plant since 1961 has confirmed its reliability, good controlability and easy servicing.

At present the transportable nuclear power plant is used as a research base for creating plants of a similar type.

Table 5-1. Performance of TEhS-3 portable nuclear power plant

Thermal power: 8,800 kw
Electrical power: 1,500 kw
Thermal efficiency: 17 per cent
Coolant: Ordinary water
Coolant flow rate: 1,000 m3/hr
Coolant pressure: 130 atm
Coolant temperature at reactor inlet: 270° C
Coolant temperature at reactor outlet: 300°C
Steam parameters - pressure: 20 atm
Steam parameters - temperature: 280°C
Fuel lifetime: 250 days


shirt

22,774 posts

203 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
Beyond Rational said:
There is an awful lot on that site that would fit in this thread.
click on the icebreaker link, some amazing pics on there

richierich37

383 posts

199 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
mat205125 said:
What do you want to know? A normal Diff, or the various kinds of limited slip diffs.

does a ltd slip diff make both driving wheels spin at the same time or is that just a normal diff?????

Stu_1.0

451 posts

199 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
A few from the automotive industry:





Muze ST

279 posts

193 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
I knows its not aginast the thread titles buts this is a great idea and works great just its always has a problem every day.


Invisible man

39,731 posts

286 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
paint tin filling station?

Muze ST

279 posts

193 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
no the verison i work will fill 1L 5L 10L bottles with a farming chemical.

racer2_uk

7 posts

187 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
Napier Lion aero engine, designed in 1917 !



DOHC, 4 valve/cylinder, W12, 24 litre, hand swing to start

Andy

carl_w

9,257 posts

260 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
racer2_uk said:
Napier Lion aero engine, designed in 1917 !



DOHC, 4 valve/cylinder, W12, 24 litre, hand swing to start

Andy
When did we decide that all the cylinders had to be encased in one big lump of metal? Early car engines had separate cylinders like the photo.

shalmaneser

5,952 posts

197 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
carl_w said:
racer2_uk said:
Napier Lion aero engine, designed in 1917 !



DOHC, 4 valve/cylinder, W12, 24 litre, hand swing to start

Andy
When did we decide that all the cylinders had to be encased in one big lump of metal? Early car engines had separate cylinders like the photo.
when someone thought of water cooling?

Nobody You Know

8,422 posts

195 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
shalmaneser said:
carl_w said:
racer2_uk said:
Napier Lion aero engine, designed in 1917 !



DOHC, 4 valve/cylinder, W12, 24 litre, hand swing to start

Andy
When did we decide that all the cylinders had to be encased in one big lump of metal? Early car engines had separate cylinders like the photo.
when someone thought of water cooling?
And starting with single castings for the block and heads.

Oystercatcher

481 posts

204 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
Further to the big ship engine posted on page 3:

Maximum power: 108,920 hp at 102 rpm
Maximum torque: 5,608,312 lb/ft at 102rpm yikes

http://people.bath.ac.uk/ccsshb/12cyl/

Will it fit your engine bay?: NOT A CHANCE

shirt

22,774 posts

203 months

Thursday 19th March 2009
quotequote all
^^^ that's nothing, just wait til the vtec kicks in

Yoshiwaan

322 posts

192 months

Thursday 19th March 2009
quotequote all
What would that engine go into? As in what particular ship(s)?

john_r

8,353 posts

273 months

Thursday 19th March 2009
quotequote all
shirt said:
^^^ that's nothing, just wait til the vtec kicks in
hehe

crofty1984

15,974 posts

206 months

Thursday 19th March 2009
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
Vr6er said:
I know what you mean:

Mr wankel - internal combustion engines...
Mate in pub - yeah
Mr wankel - not that great are they?
Mate in Pub - what do you mean? They are the best thing since sliced bread!!
Mr wankel - (sips pint) reckon I could do better...
Glad he's not my mate. Boring fker.
Unfortunately I am that man. Except without being a genius.

crofty1984

15,974 posts

206 months

Thursday 19th March 2009
quotequote all
richierich37 said:
mat205125 said:
What do you want to know? A normal Diff, or the various kinds of limited slip diffs.

does a ltd slip diff make both driving wheels spin at the same time or is that just a normal diff?????
A "normal" (open) differential will send the power to whatever wheel demands it. More goes to the wheel with the least resistance. This is fine in 99% of normal driving conditions.
In some conditions, either in snowy/icy conditions or when you're racing and one wheel has almost completely broken traction, it's not what you want. Do a "limited slip" differential will only send a certain percentage of the torque to any one wheel.

The best way to imagine it is you're parked on a muddy verge. One wheel is on the tarmac.
With an open differential, it's possible to send ALL the torque to one wheel, leaving you sat stationary with one wheel spinning happily away in the mud.
With an LSD, that one wheel can only recieve *plucks number out of air* 70% of the available torque, leaving 30% to the wheel on the tarmac to pull you along.

john_r

8,353 posts

273 months

Thursday 19th March 2009
quotequote all
Yoshiwaan said:
What would that engine go into? As in what particular ship(s)?
I saw a documentary on Discovery recently ('Mighty Ships' I think) and the 14 cylinder version was developed to go into the "Emma Mærsk" which is the largest ship ever built that is currently in use. She can carry something like 15,000 containers! eek

justinbaker

1,339 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th March 2009
quotequote all
frit said:
and then said:
Apologies that this a link and not a picture, but it really is (imo) worth watching... i was blown away by this piece of engineering... especially the bit on ice... scary!!!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww

Edited by and then on Sunday 8th March 17:15
OMG that actually made me feel quite scared, surely that cant be for real? boxedin
Me too. Imagine that wandering up to you on the battlefield.