HMS Queen Elizabeth
Discussion
Dr Jekyll said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Eagle was paid off on 26th January 1972, the Belize threat started on January 28th when Ark Royal already in the Atlantic launched a pair of heavily armed peace keeping Buccaneers, flying low level over Belize City.
An interesting question as to whether Eagle's Sea Vixens would have coped with the Guatemalan air force as well as the Ark's Phantoms would.Given what the Guatemalans had, I suspect they might.
Dr Jekyll said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Eagle was paid off on 26th January 1972, the Belize threat started on January 28th when Ark Royal already in the Atlantic launched a pair of heavily armed peace keeping Buccaneers, flying low level over Belize City.
An interesting question as to whether Eagle's Sea Vixens would have coped with the Guatemalan air force as well as the Ark's Phantoms would.Given what the Guatemalans had, I suspect they might.
The QE's propulsion motor controls will be a bit whizzbang and therefore prone to going in a huff or switching themselves off to avert smoke escapage until fully tuned; switching it off and back on again is going to be the 'go-to' response.
Edited by hidetheelephants on Monday 15th July 09:45
Europa1 said:
mikal83 said:
shed driver said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Eagle was paid off on 26th January 1972, the Belize threat started on January 28th when Ark Royal already in the Atlantic launched a pair of heavily armed peace keeping Buccaneers, flying low level over Belize City.
In theory she could have been made ready if the need was there. Eagle was my father's first ship. SD.
![wink](/inc/images/wink.gif)
Edit: for the avoidance of doubt, I have no idea as to the terms of forces' pension schemes form that era, either.
mikal83 said:
Europa1 said:
mikal83 said:
shed driver said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Eagle was paid off on 26th January 1972, the Belize threat started on January 28th when Ark Royal already in the Atlantic launched a pair of heavily armed peace keeping Buccaneers, flying low level over Belize City.
In theory she could have been made ready if the need was there. Eagle was my father's first ship. SD.
![wink](/inc/images/wink.gif)
Edit: for the avoidance of doubt, I have no idea as to the terms of forces' pension schemes form that era, either.
Gargamel said:
Cold said:
The report also makes note of the lack of chefs on board and difficulty recruiting them which has obviously caused issues at mealtimes.
Are there no ex special forces experts in weapons, tactics, unarmed combat, explosives and suchlike who also cook ? Gargamel said:
Cold said:
The report also makes note of the lack of chefs on board and difficulty recruiting them which has obviously caused issues at mealtimes.
Are there no ex special forces experts in weapons, tactics, unarmed combat, explosives and suchlike who also cook ? Cold said:
A report from the local paper states that QNLZ suffered major problems with her propulsion system shortly before the recent flood which left her without drive for 24 hours and is why she was at anchor just off Plymouth for an extended period.
https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/defence/serious-...
Surprised the headline wasnt 'New carrier sinks on sea trial'https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/defence/serious-...
Some of the news report said:
Questioned by The News on June 28 – days before the flood forced the carrier to make an unscheduled return to Portsmouth last week – the navy said it ‘would not discuss the materiel state’ of its vessels nor ‘details of their programmes’.
However, in an admission to The News today, a Royal Navy spokesman confirmed there had been problems.
‘HMS Queen Elizabeth did experience some propulsion issues during her sea training period but rectified them before continuing with her programme at that time,’ the official insisted.
However, Admiral Lord Alan West, a former head of the navy, said he was not worried about the issues.
‘These are just the niggles of a new warship,’ he said. ‘These things happen. It’s all part of the shakedown process.
‘She has not even done a full work up yet. So no, I’m not concerned about this at all.’
The report also makes note of the lack of chefs on board and difficulty recruiting them which has obviously caused issues at mealtimes. However, in an admission to The News today, a Royal Navy spokesman confirmed there had been problems.
‘HMS Queen Elizabeth did experience some propulsion issues during her sea training period but rectified them before continuing with her programme at that time,’ the official insisted.
However, Admiral Lord Alan West, a former head of the navy, said he was not worried about the issues.
‘These are just the niggles of a new warship,’ he said. ‘These things happen. It’s all part of the shakedown process.
‘She has not even done a full work up yet. So no, I’m not concerned about this at all.’
Ayahuasca said:
Gargamel said:
Cold said:
The report also makes note of the lack of chefs on board and difficulty recruiting them which has obviously caused issues at mealtimes.
Are there no ex special forces experts in weapons, tactics, unarmed combat, explosives and suchlike who also cook ? Gargamel said:
Cold said:
The report also makes note of the lack of chefs on board and difficulty recruiting them which has obviously caused issues at mealtimes.
Are there no ex special forces experts in weapons, tactics, unarmed combat, explosives and suchlike who also cook ? Military Chef courses are THE toughest courses in the military.
...on account of how no-one has ever passed one.
![wink](/inc/images/wink.gif)
Ayahuasca said:
If it came to a shooting war with the Russians or Chinese, with their pesky modern kit, how long do we expect the QE to stay afloat?
Any aircraft carrier of any size or from any nation will only last as long as it takes to get all their aircraft airborne...about 40 minutesGargamel said:
Cold said:
The report also makes note of the lack of chefs on board and difficulty recruiting them which has obviously caused issues at mealtimes.
Are there no ex special forces experts in weapons, tactics, unarmed combat, explosives and suchlike who also cook ? Halmyre said:
evidence of his cooking skills
Check the opening scene.Ryback is excused from a ceremonial duty by the CO in order to prepare 50 gallons of the ship's company's favourite bouillabaisse in celebration of the CO's birthday.
Chief Ryback can cook as well as kick terrorist arse !
https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/movie_scr...
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff