Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 3)

Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 3)

Author
Discussion

Nurburgsingh

5,137 posts

240 months

Wednesday 25th August 2021
quotequote all
MartG said:
I had one of those, but mine had a hole in the middle of the wing and a ball type nose.
I tried one with an unequal wingspan but it never flew straight.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

200 months

Wednesday 25th August 2021
quotequote all
This was a new one on me:



"The U.S. Navy’s dirigible Los Angeles, upended after a turbulent wind from the Atlantic flipped the 700-foot airship on its nose at Lakehurst, New Jersey, in 1926. The ship slowly righted itself and there were no serious injuries to the crew of 25."

I imagine that was quite concerning at the time!

Eric Mc

122,216 posts

267 months

Wednesday 25th August 2021
quotequote all
I remember seeing that picture in a book on airships when I was a kid. It amazed me at the time. Don't forget that this airship was 658 feet long - almost three times the length of a 747.

LotusOmega375D

7,738 posts

155 months

Thursday 26th August 2021
quotequote all
Not really a photo, but on ITV News just now they featured a story about the international travel traffic light system. They showed an A340 taking off from Stansted. However, it wasn’t a holiday flight, it was this one.

Number 2 on this list of the world’s most luxurious private jets.

https://www.luxuo.com/the-lux-list/worlds-top-expe...


JuniorD

8,644 posts

225 months

Sunday 29th August 2021
quotequote all


Hybrid Air Vehicles Airlander 10

DodgyGeezer

40,748 posts

192 months

Sunday 29th August 2021
quotequote all
that is some butt plug eek

mylesmcd

2,540 posts

221 months

Monday 30th August 2021
quotequote all
DodgyGeezer said:
that is some butt plug eek
Shaven viewing gallery too.

Voldemort

6,231 posts

280 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all


A Tri-Pacer, according to the internet. One engine is mounted slightly ahead of the other so the props don't smash the st out of each other.

CanAm

9,344 posts

274 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all
The TriPacer was a Pacer with a tricycle undercart rather than a tail-dragger. That’s either a very good ‘shop or a well made hoax.
(Waits to be shot down in flames when it turns out to be real yikes)

Fastdruid

8,685 posts

154 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all
CanAm said:
The TriPacer was a Pacer with a tricycle undercart rather than a tail-dragger. That’s either a very good ‘shop or a well made hoax.
(Waits to be shot down in flames when it turns out to be real yikes)
It appears real but it's not the Tri-Pacer.

"Also known as the Wagner Twin 2, Wagner Twin Tri-Pacer, and Wagner Pacer 125, this was a standard PA-22 fitted with two 125 hp Lycoming O-290-D engines mounted side-by-side. The conversion was produced in three weeks by Harold Wagner from Portland, Oregon. To clear the two overlapping propellers the left engine shaft was fitted with a 4.75 in (121 mm) extension. After 100 hours testing, the aircraft was converted back to its original configuration."

http://www.aviastar.org/air/usa/wagner_twinpacer.p...

Bunch more info on some even weirder versions here:

http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/models/aircraft/Piper...



Edited by Fastdruid on Tuesday 31st August 08:52

CanAm

9,344 posts

274 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all
Fastdruid said:
CanAm said:
The TriPacer was a Pacer with a tricycle undercart rather than a tail-dragger. That’s either a very good ‘shop or a well made hoax.
(Waits to be shot down in flames when it turns out to be real yikes)
It appears real but it's not the Tri-Pacer.

"Also known as the Wagner Twin 2, Wagner Twin Tri-Pacer, and Wagner Pacer 125, this was a standard PA-22 fitted with two 125 hp Lycoming O-290-D engines mounted side-by-side. The conversion was produced in three weeks by Harold Wagner from Portland, Oregon. To clear the two overlapping propellers the left engine shaft was fitted with a 4.75 in (121 mm) extension. After 100 hours testing, the aircraft was converted back to its original configuration."

http://www.aviastar.org/air/usa/wagner_twinpacer.p...

Bunch more info on some even weirder versions here:

http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/models/aircraft/Piper...



Edited by Fastdruid on Tuesday 31st August 08:52
There you go; “Never say never”!

yellowjack

17,091 posts

168 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all
Voldemort said:


A Tri-Pacer, according to the internet. One engine is mounted slightly ahead of the other so the props don't smash the st out of each other.
Twice the power, half the endurance! Form an orderly queue now, ladies and gents, and we're limiting them to only one each if you please...

CanAm

9,344 posts

274 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all
Fastdruid said:
CanAm said:
The TriPacer was a Pacer with a tricycle undercart rather than a tail-dragger. That’s either a very good ‘shop or a well made hoax.
(Waits to be shot down in flames when it turns out to be real yikes)
It appears real but it's not the Tri-Pacer.

"Also known as the Wagner Twin 2, Wagner Twin Tri-Pacer, and Wagner Pacer 125, this was a standard PA-22 fitted with two 125 hp Lycoming O-290-D engines mounted side-by-side. The conversion was produced in three weeks by Harold Wagner from Portland, Oregon. To clear the two overlapping propellers the left engine shaft was fitted with a 4.75 in (121 mm) extension. After 100 hours testing, the aircraft was converted back to its original configuration."
Was that flight testing? They must have had to juggle bits around to keep the CofG in the right place.

Fastdruid

8,685 posts

154 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all
CanAm said:
Fastdruid said:
CanAm said:
The TriPacer was a Pacer with a tricycle undercart rather than a tail-dragger. That’s either a very good ‘shop or a well made hoax.
(Waits to be shot down in flames when it turns out to be real yikes)
It appears real but it's not the Tri-Pacer.

"Also known as the Wagner Twin 2, Wagner Twin Tri-Pacer, and Wagner Pacer 125, this was a standard PA-22 fitted with two 125 hp Lycoming O-290-D engines mounted side-by-side. The conversion was produced in three weeks by Harold Wagner from Portland, Oregon. To clear the two overlapping propellers the left engine shaft was fitted with a 4.75 in (121 mm) extension. After 100 hours testing, the aircraft was converted back to its original configuration."
Was that flight testing? They must have had to juggle bits around to keep the CofG in the right place.
Says here "flew 100 hours" but who knows.

http://www.twinnavion.com/oddballs.htm

100hours seems rather a long time for ground only testing of such an experimental beast for a small/one man band company.

MartG

20,732 posts

206 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all

JuniorD

8,644 posts

225 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all
The RAF should not be allowed near Blackpool unless it’s to deliver a few tonnes of ordnance

tdm34

7,375 posts

212 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all
MartG said:
Think these might push it





Eric Mc

122,216 posts

267 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all
I've always liked the pictures taken on their 1972 tour when they were still using the Gnats -



I also think this picture is spectacular -


RizzoTheRat

25,303 posts

194 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Given that the Gnat has a 22' wingspan, that must be less than 6' off the ground eek

hidetheelephants

25,035 posts

195 months

Tuesday 31st August 2021
quotequote all
Ground effect makes it less gnarly than it looks; still interview without tea or biscuits territory though.