Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Oilchange

8,509 posts

261 months

Saturday 5th December 2020
quotequote all
WTF !

FourWheelDrift

88,670 posts

285 months

Saturday 5th December 2020
quotequote all
More photos on here of it, chrome auto translate also helps - http://alternathistory.com/eksperimentalnyi-samole...

Oilchange

8,509 posts

261 months

Saturday 5th December 2020
quotequote all
It was a bit of a visual illusion, to me anyway. The first glance I gave it and I thought I saw the chunkiest, most slab of cheddar like wing shape I've ever seen but of course when my knackered, alcohol-piss-riddled eyes adjusted, I could see the reality.

Still, weird version of the Hurrrrrr'caine. As the Americans might say...

Lily the Pink

5,783 posts

171 months

Saturday 5th December 2020
quotequote all
Oilchange said:
WTF !
Not to mention ... why ???

Eric Mc

122,165 posts

266 months

Saturday 5th December 2020
quotequote all
Slip wing Hurricane- to extend range.
Not a huge leap considering it’s immediate ancestor was the biplane Hawker Fury.

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Saturday 5th December 2020
quotequote all
The original intention was to increase climbing ability - more wings = more lift. The idea was to jettison the top wing once at altitude. Not sure how they planned to keep the fin from being severed.

The RAF’s plan was to use the top wing as an additional fuel tank to increase range.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, none of the ideas was pursued.

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Saturday 5th December 2020
quotequote all

Glosphil

4,382 posts

235 months

Saturday 5th December 2020
quotequote all
OscarJ said:
Yeah that’s about right. The Vulcans in Goose Bay were 1969.









I flew in a Hastings back from Iraq in 1954. The journey out 15 months earlier was in a York.
I think the flight back from Egypt in 1950 was also in a Hastings. All 3 flights as a youngster in RAF aircraft.
All 3 flights were uneventful. Unlikely my next flights with BOAC to Singapore & back twice.

Edited by Glosphil on Saturday 5th December 20:13

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 5th December 2020
quotequote all


Stratocruiser at New York idlewild which became JFK

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Saturday 5th December 2020
quotequote all
El stovey said:


Stratocruiser at New York idlewild which became JFK
I would take a flight in a 737Max any day.

Eric Mc

122,165 posts

266 months

Sunday 6th December 2020
quotequote all
El stovey said:


Stratocruiser at New York idlewild which became JFK
I just love period photos like that.

DoubleD

22,154 posts

109 months

Sunday 6th December 2020
quotequote all
I'm not surprised that they are all stopping to look at that, it's one weird looking plane!

Eric Mc

122,165 posts

266 months

Sunday 6th December 2020
quotequote all
It's the Boeing 377 Stratocruiser - which was developed from the B-29 Superfortress bomber. Compared to its rivals (the Douglas DC-6/7 and Lockheed Constellation) it was not sold in great numbers (under 100) but it was a popular aircraft with passengers because it was roomy and it had a downstairs lounge.



The military version (C-97/KC-97) was built in large numbers -





Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Sunday 6th December 2020
quotequote all
DoubleD said:
I'm not surprised that they are all stopping to look at that, it's one weird looking plane!
The developments were a lot weirder...



Eric Mc

122,165 posts

266 months

Sunday 6th December 2020
quotequote all
Indeed. Aero Spacelines converted a number of 377/KC97s, initially to facilitate large components of rockets and spacecraft.

Guppy -



Super Guppy -



The diameter of the Super Guppy fuselage was determined by the requirement to transport the SIVB third stage of the Saturn V moon rocket -




anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 6th December 2020
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Indeed. Aero Spacelines converted a number of 377/KC97s, initially to facilitate large components of rockets and spacecraft.
I don’t think any were actually Boeing 377 conversions as none have/had the nose radome like the C-97s did.

Eric Mc

122,165 posts

266 months

Sunday 6th December 2020
quotequote all
Aero Spacelines obtained their airframes from a number of different sources. Some were ex-airliners and some were ex military transports/tankers.

The military version had the under nose radome. The airliners didn't.

There were also two fundamental conversions carried out by Aero Spacelines. There was the original Pregnant Guppy - which retained the original piston engines and then the Super Guppy, which had turboprops.

Pregnant Guppy -


Super Guppy -



There was also the Conroy Skymonster, a one off conversion of a Canadair CL44 which was based in the UK for a number of years -



Jack Conroy was the man behind Aero Spacelines.



FourWheelDrift

88,670 posts

285 months

Sunday 6th December 2020
quotequote all
NASA still operate their Super Guppy Turbine.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Sunday 6th December 2020
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
There was also the Conroy Skymonster, a one off conversion of a Canadair CL44 which was based in the UK for a number of years -



Jack Conroy was the man behind Aero Spacelines.
Up until a least a few years ago this was at Bournemouth airport apparently derelict but with some work being done on it, and there were wild rumours of an attempt to put it back in the air . I still don't know what was really going on.

NM62

952 posts

151 months

Sunday 6th December 2020
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Up until a least a few years ago this was at Bournemouth airport apparently derelict but with some work being done on it, and there were wild rumours of an attempt to put it back in the air . I still don't know what was really going on.
I saw it at Bournemouth a couple of weeks back looking in a very sorry state, mind you there were a few other aircraft that did too.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED