AH64 Apache - can they roll?
Discussion
Quick silver said:
dr_gn said:
what on earth are you on about?
As previously explained, read 'S-70 ORIGINS', second paragraph : http://www.vectorsite.net/avs70_1.htmlSaying that the main difference between the S-67 and UH-60 are removal of wings and a wider body is like saying the main differneces between an F1 car and a Bus are the removal of wings and a wider body. After all - they both use LED rear lights and KERS.
Quick silver said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Quick silver said:
Both Helicicopters are Sikorsky & both were developted from the same blueprint, the later UH-60 being the production choice.....I see little reason in arguing the point over a prototype that never actually went into production - S-69 variants are mute.
What blueprint? Other than being made by the same manufacturer they have nothing in common except the name which was reused after the S-67 gunship was cancelled.Sikorsky preceded S-70 prototype construction with a set of five demonstrators, based on modified S-61 and S-65 transport helicopters plus the experimental S-67 gunship, to validate UTTAS technologies.
Just done a bit of digging & found this under S-70 origins, second paragraph : http://www.vectorsite.net/avs70_1.html
Please trust me, I know what I'm talking about here.
This migh have been a single system, a new bit of avionics kit or a method of construction, I certainly wouldn't say the Blackhawk was developed from it.
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff